Cargando…

Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process

Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is a widely implemented evidence-based program for supporting students with at-risk levels of social and emotional behavior concerns. It is comprised of several core features described in the previous literature, including practice elements, which are the specific actions t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filter, Kevin J., Ford, Andrea L. B., Bullard, Samuel J., Cook, Clayton R., Sowle, Courtney A., Johnson, LeAnne D., Kloos, Eric, Dupuis, Danielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09495-x
_version_ 1784640238594818048
author Filter, Kevin J.
Ford, Andrea L. B.
Bullard, Samuel J.
Cook, Clayton R.
Sowle, Courtney A.
Johnson, LeAnne D.
Kloos, Eric
Dupuis, Danielle
author_facet Filter, Kevin J.
Ford, Andrea L. B.
Bullard, Samuel J.
Cook, Clayton R.
Sowle, Courtney A.
Johnson, LeAnne D.
Kloos, Eric
Dupuis, Danielle
author_sort Filter, Kevin J.
collection PubMed
description Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is a widely implemented evidence-based program for supporting students with at-risk levels of social and emotional behavior concerns. It is comprised of several core features described in the previous literature, including practice elements, which are the specific actions that are delivered directly to students, and implementation components, which are actions that support the implementation by adults. Practice elements and implementation components are both important to implementation but have been combined and conflated in descriptions of CICO implementation. Well-defined and differentiated practice elements could provide improved clarity in communicating implementation expectations to front-line implementers as well as support future research into essential active ingredients and measures of front-line intervention fidelity. The purpose of the present study was to distill, differentiate, and operationally define the student-facing practice elements of CICO. A panel of research experts and practice experts participated in a three-round modified e-Delphi process that led to the identification and operational definition of 19 discreet practice elements organized into five domains. Results are discussed in terms in implications for future development of measures of commitment and intervention fidelity, future research into active ingredients of CICO, and in terms of how well-defined practice elements can improve communication of implementation expectations for front-line implementers of CICO such as teachers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12310-021-09495-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8791689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87916892022-01-27 Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process Filter, Kevin J. Ford, Andrea L. B. Bullard, Samuel J. Cook, Clayton R. Sowle, Courtney A. Johnson, LeAnne D. Kloos, Eric Dupuis, Danielle School Ment Health Original Paper Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is a widely implemented evidence-based program for supporting students with at-risk levels of social and emotional behavior concerns. It is comprised of several core features described in the previous literature, including practice elements, which are the specific actions that are delivered directly to students, and implementation components, which are actions that support the implementation by adults. Practice elements and implementation components are both important to implementation but have been combined and conflated in descriptions of CICO implementation. Well-defined and differentiated practice elements could provide improved clarity in communicating implementation expectations to front-line implementers as well as support future research into essential active ingredients and measures of front-line intervention fidelity. The purpose of the present study was to distill, differentiate, and operationally define the student-facing practice elements of CICO. A panel of research experts and practice experts participated in a three-round modified e-Delphi process that led to the identification and operational definition of 19 discreet practice elements organized into five domains. Results are discussed in terms in implications for future development of measures of commitment and intervention fidelity, future research into active ingredients of CICO, and in terms of how well-defined practice elements can improve communication of implementation expectations for front-line implementers of CICO such as teachers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12310-021-09495-x. Springer US 2022-01-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8791689/ /pubmed/35103078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09495-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021, corrected publication 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Filter, Kevin J.
Ford, Andrea L. B.
Bullard, Samuel J.
Cook, Clayton R.
Sowle, Courtney A.
Johnson, LeAnne D.
Kloos, Eric
Dupuis, Danielle
Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process
title Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process
title_full Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process
title_fullStr Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process
title_full_unstemmed Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process
title_short Distilling Check-in/Check-Out into Its Core Practice Elements Through an Expert Consensus Process
title_sort distilling check-in/check-out into its core practice elements through an expert consensus process
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09495-x
work_keys_str_mv AT filterkevinj distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess
AT fordandrealb distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess
AT bullardsamuelj distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess
AT cookclaytonr distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess
AT sowlecourtneya distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess
AT johnsonleanned distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess
AT klooseric distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess
AT dupuisdanielle distillingcheckincheckoutintoitscorepracticeelementsthroughanexpertconsensusprocess