Cargando…

Diagnostic validity of early proximal caries detection using near-infrared imaging technology on 3D range data of posterior teeth

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study analysed potential of early proximal caries detection using 3D range data of teeth consisting of near-infrared reflection images at 850 nm (NIRR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty healthy and carious permanent human teeth were arranged pairwise, examined with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Litzenburger, Friederike, Heck, Katrin, Kaisarly, Dalia, Kunzelmann, Karl-Heinz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04032-1
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study analysed potential of early proximal caries detection using 3D range data of teeth consisting of near-infrared reflection images at 850 nm (NIRR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty healthy and carious permanent human teeth were arranged pairwise, examined with bitewing radiography (BWR) and NIRR and validated with micro-computed tomography. NIRR findings were evaluated from buccal, lingual and occlusal (trilateral) views according to yes/no decisions about presence of caries. Reliability assessments included kappa statistics and revealed high agreement for both methods. Statistical analysis included cross tabulation and calculation of sensitivity, specificity and AUC. RESULTS: Underestimation of caries was 24.8% for NIRR and 26.4% for BWR. Overestimation was 10.4% for occlusal NIRR and 0% for BWR. Trilateral NIRR had overall accuracy of 64.8%, overestimation of 15.6% and underestimation of 19.6%. NIRR and BWR showed high specificity and low sensitivity for proximal caries detection. CONCLUSIONS: NIRR achieved diagnostic results comparable to BWR. Trilateral NIRR assessments overestimated presence of proximal caries, revealing stronger sensitivity for initial caries detection than BWR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: NIRR provided valid complement to BWR as diagnostic instrument. Investigation from multiple angles did not substantially improve proximal caries detection with NIRR.