Cargando…

Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis

OBJECTIVES: Cephalometric analyses using lateral craniofacial radiographs are common diagnostic procedures for evaluating skeletal patterns. However, in patients with pronounced abnormalities like cleft lip and palate, standard cephalometric analyses and landmarks may not be suitable. This study aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doberschütz, Philine Henriette, Schwahn, Christian, Krey, Karl-Friedrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04006-3
_version_ 1784640288774422528
author Doberschütz, Philine Henriette
Schwahn, Christian
Krey, Karl-Friedrich
author_facet Doberschütz, Philine Henriette
Schwahn, Christian
Krey, Karl-Friedrich
author_sort Doberschütz, Philine Henriette
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Cephalometric analyses using lateral craniofacial radiographs are common diagnostic procedures for evaluating skeletal patterns. However, in patients with pronounced abnormalities like cleft lip and palate, standard cephalometric analyses and landmarks may not be suitable. This study aims to clarify whether the inclusion of landmarks less compromised by the cleft defect or located outside the cleft area results in a different cephalometric assessment of the viscerocranium. Delaire’s whole-skull analysis and Bergen analysis were examined for similarities and underlying common observations. MATERIALS/METHODS: Based on the cephalometric evaluation of 217 patients with different types of non-syndromal cleft formation, Delaire and Bergen analysis were compared using three statistical methods: correlation analysis, factor analysis, and cluster analysis. Reproducibility was assessed by Bland–Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients, mean absolute differences, and coefficients of variability. RESULTS: Although Delaire analysis and Bergen analysis are based on different concepts and landmarks, a majority of corresponding variables was found. Certain aspects of craniofacial base relation and craniospinal articulation are only assessed by Delaire analysis. All but one variable showed very good reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of landmarks less compromised by or located outside the cleft area does not result in variables that provide a different assessment of the viscerocranial area. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings contradict the concept of invalidity of landmarks compromised by the cleft defect or located within the affected cleft area. Within the scope of its viscerocranial field of view, Bergen analysis appears to be on a par with Delaire analysis in the diagnosis of cleft patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-021-04006-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8791903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87919032022-02-02 Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis Doberschütz, Philine Henriette Schwahn, Christian Krey, Karl-Friedrich Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Cephalometric analyses using lateral craniofacial radiographs are common diagnostic procedures for evaluating skeletal patterns. However, in patients with pronounced abnormalities like cleft lip and palate, standard cephalometric analyses and landmarks may not be suitable. This study aims to clarify whether the inclusion of landmarks less compromised by the cleft defect or located outside the cleft area results in a different cephalometric assessment of the viscerocranium. Delaire’s whole-skull analysis and Bergen analysis were examined for similarities and underlying common observations. MATERIALS/METHODS: Based on the cephalometric evaluation of 217 patients with different types of non-syndromal cleft formation, Delaire and Bergen analysis were compared using three statistical methods: correlation analysis, factor analysis, and cluster analysis. Reproducibility was assessed by Bland–Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients, mean absolute differences, and coefficients of variability. RESULTS: Although Delaire analysis and Bergen analysis are based on different concepts and landmarks, a majority of corresponding variables was found. Certain aspects of craniofacial base relation and craniospinal articulation are only assessed by Delaire analysis. All but one variable showed very good reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of landmarks less compromised by or located outside the cleft area does not result in variables that provide a different assessment of the viscerocranial area. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings contradict the concept of invalidity of landmarks compromised by the cleft defect or located within the affected cleft area. Within the scope of its viscerocranial field of view, Bergen analysis appears to be on a par with Delaire analysis in the diagnosis of cleft patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-021-04006-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8791903/ /pubmed/34050425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04006-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Doberschütz, Philine Henriette
Schwahn, Christian
Krey, Karl-Friedrich
Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis
title Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis
title_full Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis
title_fullStr Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis
title_short Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis
title_sort cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of delaire’s craniofacial analysis to bergen analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04006-3
work_keys_str_mv AT doberschutzphilinehenriette cephalometricanalysesforcleftpatientsastatisticalapproachtocomparethevariablesofdelairescraniofacialanalysistobergenanalysis
AT schwahnchristian cephalometricanalysesforcleftpatientsastatisticalapproachtocomparethevariablesofdelairescraniofacialanalysistobergenanalysis
AT kreykarlfriedrich cephalometricanalysesforcleftpatientsastatisticalapproachtocomparethevariablesofdelairescraniofacialanalysistobergenanalysis