Cargando…

Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer

BACKGROUND: A procedure for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using superparamagnetic iron-oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles and intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection was developed to overcome drawbacks associated with the current standard-of-care SLNB. However, residual SPIO nanoparticles can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christenhusz, Anke, Pouw, Joost J., Simonis, Frank F. J., Douek, Michael, Ahmed, Muneer, Klaase, Joost M., Dassen, Anneriet E., Klazen, Caroline A. H., van der Schaaf, Margreet C., ten Haken, Bernard, Alic, Lejla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00257-7
_version_ 1784640333343096832
author Christenhusz, Anke
Pouw, Joost J.
Simonis, Frank F. J.
Douek, Michael
Ahmed, Muneer
Klaase, Joost M.
Dassen, Anneriet E.
Klazen, Caroline A. H.
van der Schaaf, Margreet C.
ten Haken, Bernard
Alic, Lejla
author_facet Christenhusz, Anke
Pouw, Joost J.
Simonis, Frank F. J.
Douek, Michael
Ahmed, Muneer
Klaase, Joost M.
Dassen, Anneriet E.
Klazen, Caroline A. H.
van der Schaaf, Margreet C.
ten Haken, Bernard
Alic, Lejla
author_sort Christenhusz, Anke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A procedure for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using superparamagnetic iron-oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles and intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection was developed to overcome drawbacks associated with the current standard-of-care SLNB. However, residual SPIO nanoparticles can result in void artefacts at follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We present a grading protocol to quantitatively assess the severity of these artefacts and offer an option to minimise the impact of SPIO nanoparticles on diagnostic imaging. METHODS: Follow-up mammography and MRI of two patient groups after a magnetic SLNB were included in the study. They received a 2-mL subareolar dose of SPIO (high-dose, HD) or a 0.1-mL intratumoural dose of SPIO (low-dose, LD). Follow-up mammography and MRI after magnetic SLNB were acquired within 4 years after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Two radiologists with over 10-year experience in breast imaging assessed the images and analysed the void artefacts and their impact on diagnostic follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included (HD, n = 13; LD, n = 6). In the HD group, 9/13 patients displayed an artefact on T1-weighted images up to 3.6 years after the procedure, while no impact of the SPIO remnants was observed in the LD group. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB using a 2-mL subareolar dose of magnetic tracer in patients undergoing BCS resulted in residual artefacts in the breast in the majority of patients, which may hamper follow-up MRI. This can be avoided by using a 0.1-mL intratumoural dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8792114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87921142022-02-02 Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer Christenhusz, Anke Pouw, Joost J. Simonis, Frank F. J. Douek, Michael Ahmed, Muneer Klaase, Joost M. Dassen, Anneriet E. Klazen, Caroline A. H. van der Schaaf, Margreet C. ten Haken, Bernard Alic, Lejla Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: A procedure for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using superparamagnetic iron-oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles and intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection was developed to overcome drawbacks associated with the current standard-of-care SLNB. However, residual SPIO nanoparticles can result in void artefacts at follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We present a grading protocol to quantitatively assess the severity of these artefacts and offer an option to minimise the impact of SPIO nanoparticles on diagnostic imaging. METHODS: Follow-up mammography and MRI of two patient groups after a magnetic SLNB were included in the study. They received a 2-mL subareolar dose of SPIO (high-dose, HD) or a 0.1-mL intratumoural dose of SPIO (low-dose, LD). Follow-up mammography and MRI after magnetic SLNB were acquired within 4 years after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Two radiologists with over 10-year experience in breast imaging assessed the images and analysed the void artefacts and their impact on diagnostic follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included (HD, n = 13; LD, n = 6). In the HD group, 9/13 patients displayed an artefact on T1-weighted images up to 3.6 years after the procedure, while no impact of the SPIO remnants was observed in the LD group. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB using a 2-mL subareolar dose of magnetic tracer in patients undergoing BCS resulted in residual artefacts in the breast in the majority of patients, which may hamper follow-up MRI. This can be avoided by using a 0.1-mL intratumoural dose. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8792114/ /pubmed/35083595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00257-7 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Christenhusz, Anke
Pouw, Joost J.
Simonis, Frank F. J.
Douek, Michael
Ahmed, Muneer
Klaase, Joost M.
Dassen, Anneriet E.
Klazen, Caroline A. H.
van der Schaaf, Margreet C.
ten Haken, Bernard
Alic, Lejla
Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer
title Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer
title_full Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer
title_fullStr Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer
title_full_unstemmed Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer
title_short Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer
title_sort breast mri in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00257-7
work_keys_str_mv AT christenhuszanke breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT pouwjoostj breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT simonisfrankfj breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT douekmichael breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT ahmedmuneer breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT klaasejoostm breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT dassenanneriete breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT klazencarolineah breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT vanderschaafmargreetc breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT tenhakenbernard breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer
AT aliclejla breastmriinpatientsafterbreastconservingsurgerywithsentinelnodeprocedureusingasuperparamagnetictracer