Cargando…
Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium
Despite promising findings, quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based tests for RNA quantification have experienced serious limitations in their clinical application. The noticeable lack of technical standardization remains a huge obstacle in the translation of qPCR-based tests. The incorporation of qPCR-based...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.12.007 |
_version_ | 1784640355107340288 |
---|---|
author | de Gonzalo-Calvo, David Marchese, Monica Hellemans, Jan Betsou, Fay Skov Frisk, Nanna Lond Dalgaard, Louise Torp Lakkisto, Päivi Foy, Carole Scherer, Andreas Garcia Bermejo, María Laura Devaux, Yvan |
author_facet | de Gonzalo-Calvo, David Marchese, Monica Hellemans, Jan Betsou, Fay Skov Frisk, Nanna Lond Dalgaard, Louise Torp Lakkisto, Päivi Foy, Carole Scherer, Andreas Garcia Bermejo, María Laura Devaux, Yvan |
author_sort | de Gonzalo-Calvo, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite promising findings, quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based tests for RNA quantification have experienced serious limitations in their clinical application. The noticeable lack of technical standardization remains a huge obstacle in the translation of qPCR-based tests. The incorporation of qPCR-based tests into the clinic will benefit from guidelines for clinical research assay validation. This will ultimately impact the clinical management of the patient, including diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, monitoring of the therapeutic response, and evaluation of toxicity. However, clear assay validation protocols for biomarker investigation in clinical trials using molecular assays are currently lacking. Here, we will focus on the necessary steps, including sample acquisition, processing and storage, RNA purification, target selection, assay design, and experimental design, that need to be taken toward the appropriate validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research. These recommendations can fill the gap between research use only (RUO) and in vitro diagnostics (IVD). Our contribution provides a tool for basic and clinical research for the development of validated assays in the intermediate steps of biomarker research. These guidelines are based on the current understanding and consensus within the EU-CardioRNA COST Action consortium (www.cardiorna.eu). Their applicability encompasses all clinical areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8792405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87924052022-02-02 Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium de Gonzalo-Calvo, David Marchese, Monica Hellemans, Jan Betsou, Fay Skov Frisk, Nanna Lond Dalgaard, Louise Torp Lakkisto, Päivi Foy, Carole Scherer, Andreas Garcia Bermejo, María Laura Devaux, Yvan Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Review Despite promising findings, quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based tests for RNA quantification have experienced serious limitations in their clinical application. The noticeable lack of technical standardization remains a huge obstacle in the translation of qPCR-based tests. The incorporation of qPCR-based tests into the clinic will benefit from guidelines for clinical research assay validation. This will ultimately impact the clinical management of the patient, including diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, monitoring of the therapeutic response, and evaluation of toxicity. However, clear assay validation protocols for biomarker investigation in clinical trials using molecular assays are currently lacking. Here, we will focus on the necessary steps, including sample acquisition, processing and storage, RNA purification, target selection, assay design, and experimental design, that need to be taken toward the appropriate validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research. These recommendations can fill the gap between research use only (RUO) and in vitro diagnostics (IVD). Our contribution provides a tool for basic and clinical research for the development of validated assays in the intermediate steps of biomarker research. These guidelines are based on the current understanding and consensus within the EU-CardioRNA COST Action consortium (www.cardiorna.eu). Their applicability encompasses all clinical areas. American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8792405/ /pubmed/35118162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.12.007 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review de Gonzalo-Calvo, David Marchese, Monica Hellemans, Jan Betsou, Fay Skov Frisk, Nanna Lond Dalgaard, Louise Torp Lakkisto, Päivi Foy, Carole Scherer, Andreas Garcia Bermejo, María Laura Devaux, Yvan Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium |
title | Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium |
title_full | Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium |
title_fullStr | Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium |
title_short | Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium |
title_sort | consensus guidelines for the validation of qrt-pcr assays in clinical research by the cardiorna consortium |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.12.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degonzalocalvodavid consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT marchesemonica consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT hellemansjan consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT betsoufay consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT skovfrisknannalond consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT dalgaardlouisetorp consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT lakkistopaivi consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT foycarole consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT schererandreas consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT garciabermejomarialaura consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT devauxyvan consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium AT consensusguidelinesforthevalidationofqrtpcrassaysinclinicalresearchbythecardiornaconsortium |