Cargando…

Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization

Hybridization is a natural process at species‐range boundaries that may variably promote the speciation process or break down species barriers but minimally will influence management outcomes of distinct populations. White‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Combe, Fraser J., Jaster, Levi, Ricketts, Andrew, Haukos, David, Hope, Andrew G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13330
_version_ 1784640373852733440
author Combe, Fraser J.
Jaster, Levi
Ricketts, Andrew
Haukos, David
Hope, Andrew G.
author_facet Combe, Fraser J.
Jaster, Levi
Ricketts, Andrew
Haukos, David
Hope, Andrew G.
author_sort Combe, Fraser J.
collection PubMed
description Hybridization is a natural process at species‐range boundaries that may variably promote the speciation process or break down species barriers but minimally will influence management outcomes of distinct populations. White‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) have broad and overlapping distributions in North America and a recognized capacity for interspecific hybridization. In response to contemporary environmental change to any of one or multiple still‐unknown factors, mule deer range is contracting westward accompanied by a westward expansion of white‐tailed deer, leading to increasing interactions, opportunities for gene flow, and associated conservation implications. To quantify genetic diversity, phylogenomic structure, and dynamics of hybridization in sympatric populations of white‐tailed and mule deer, we used mitochondrial cytochrome b data coupled with SNP loci discovered with double‐digest restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing. We recovered 25,018 SNPs across 92 deer samples from both species, collected from two regions of western Kansas. Eight individuals with unambiguous external morphology representing both species were of hybrid origin (8.7%), and represented the product of multi‐generational backcrossing. Mitochondrial data showed both ancient and recent directional discordance with morphological species assignments, reflecting a legacy of mule deer males mating with white‐tailed deer females. Mule deer had lower genetic diversity than white‐tailed deer, and both mitochondrial and nuclear data suggest contemporary mule deer effective population decline. Landscape genetic analyses show relative isolation between the two study regions for white‐tailed deer, but greater connectivity among mule deer, with predominant movement from north to south. Collectively, our results suggest a long history of gene flow between these species in the Great Plains and hint at evolutionary processes that purge incompatible functional genomic elements as a result of hybridization. Surviving hybrids evidently may be reproductive, but with unknown consequences for the future integrity of these species, population trajectories, or relative susceptibility to emerging pathogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8792484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87924842022-02-04 Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization Combe, Fraser J. Jaster, Levi Ricketts, Andrew Haukos, David Hope, Andrew G. Evol Appl Original Articles Hybridization is a natural process at species‐range boundaries that may variably promote the speciation process or break down species barriers but minimally will influence management outcomes of distinct populations. White‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) have broad and overlapping distributions in North America and a recognized capacity for interspecific hybridization. In response to contemporary environmental change to any of one or multiple still‐unknown factors, mule deer range is contracting westward accompanied by a westward expansion of white‐tailed deer, leading to increasing interactions, opportunities for gene flow, and associated conservation implications. To quantify genetic diversity, phylogenomic structure, and dynamics of hybridization in sympatric populations of white‐tailed and mule deer, we used mitochondrial cytochrome b data coupled with SNP loci discovered with double‐digest restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing. We recovered 25,018 SNPs across 92 deer samples from both species, collected from two regions of western Kansas. Eight individuals with unambiguous external morphology representing both species were of hybrid origin (8.7%), and represented the product of multi‐generational backcrossing. Mitochondrial data showed both ancient and recent directional discordance with morphological species assignments, reflecting a legacy of mule deer males mating with white‐tailed deer females. Mule deer had lower genetic diversity than white‐tailed deer, and both mitochondrial and nuclear data suggest contemporary mule deer effective population decline. Landscape genetic analyses show relative isolation between the two study regions for white‐tailed deer, but greater connectivity among mule deer, with predominant movement from north to south. Collectively, our results suggest a long history of gene flow between these species in the Great Plains and hint at evolutionary processes that purge incompatible functional genomic elements as a result of hybridization. Surviving hybrids evidently may be reproductive, but with unknown consequences for the future integrity of these species, population trajectories, or relative susceptibility to emerging pathogens. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8792484/ /pubmed/35126651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13330 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Combe, Fraser J.
Jaster, Levi
Ricketts, Andrew
Haukos, David
Hope, Andrew G.
Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization
title Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization
title_full Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization
title_fullStr Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization
title_full_unstemmed Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization
title_short Population genomics of free‐ranging Great Plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization
title_sort population genomics of free‐ranging great plains white‐tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13330
work_keys_str_mv AT combefraserj populationgenomicsoffreeranginggreatplainswhitetailedandmuledeerreflectsalonghistoryofinterspecifichybridization
AT jasterlevi populationgenomicsoffreeranginggreatplainswhitetailedandmuledeerreflectsalonghistoryofinterspecifichybridization
AT rickettsandrew populationgenomicsoffreeranginggreatplainswhitetailedandmuledeerreflectsalonghistoryofinterspecifichybridization
AT haukosdavid populationgenomicsoffreeranginggreatplainswhitetailedandmuledeerreflectsalonghistoryofinterspecifichybridization
AT hopeandrewg populationgenomicsoffreeranginggreatplainswhitetailedandmuledeerreflectsalonghistoryofinterspecifichybridization