Cargando…

The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait

CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a 3-dimensional pathology associated with insufficiency of the posterior tibial tendon (PTT), ligamentous failure, joint malalignment, and aberrant plantar force distribution. Existing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry, Jensen K., Hoffman, Jeffrey W., Kim, Jaeyoung, Steineman, Brett D., Sturnick, Daniel R., Demetracopoulos, Constantine A., Deland, Jonathan T., Ellis, Scott J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792578/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00237
_version_ 1784640401644191744
author Henry, Jensen K.
Hoffman, Jeffrey W.
Kim, Jaeyoung
Steineman, Brett D.
Sturnick, Daniel R.
Demetracopoulos, Constantine A.
Deland, Jonathan T.
Ellis, Scott J.
author_facet Henry, Jensen K.
Hoffman, Jeffrey W.
Kim, Jaeyoung
Steineman, Brett D.
Sturnick, Daniel R.
Demetracopoulos, Constantine A.
Deland, Jonathan T.
Ellis, Scott J.
author_sort Henry, Jensen K.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a 3-dimensional pathology associated with insufficiency of the posterior tibial tendon (PTT), ligamentous failure, joint malalignment, and aberrant plantar force distribution. Existing knowledge of PCFD consists of static measurements, which provide information about the structure of the foot but none about its function. Cadaveric gait models provide an opportunity to measure motion both at the joints primarily affected in PCFD and the adjacent joints that are at risk for progressive subluxation and arthritis. This study sought to develop a flatfoot model for a robotic gait simulator and quantify gait kinematics and plantar pressure between normal and flatfoot conditions, which we hypothesized would be altered after the creation of a flatfoot deformity model. METHODS: Cadaveric specimens were loaded on a 6-degree of freedom robotic gait simulator and the extrinsic tendons were attached to linear motors. Ground reaction forces and muscle forces were optimized utilizing an established iterative process. An 8-camera motion capture system was utilized to calculate joint kinematics using reflective markers attached by k-wires into bone. A plantar pressure mat attached to the force platform was used to calculate the center of pressure excursion index (CPEI) for each condition. The flatfoot model was created via sectioning of the spring ligament and medial talonavicular joint capsule followed by cyclic axial compression until 5-15° of talonavicular abduction was achieved in a static, loaded pose. Testing of the flatfoot state was then performed with inactivation of the PTT. Bias-corrected bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were constructed from the repeated measures difference between flatfoot and normal conditions. Paired t-tests were used to compare the CPEI between conditions. RESULTS: Twelve mid-tibia cadaveric specimens (mean age 73 years, 8 female) with no prior foot/ankle surgery were used. There were significant differences in kinematics between normal and PCFD conditions at the ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular joints (Figure). There was significantly increased ankle plantar flexion in flatfoot in the first 80% of stance phase. There was significantly greater subtalar eversion in flatfoot compared to normal from 10-90% of stance phase. Talonavicular abduction and eversion were also significantly greater in flatfoot from 10-100% of stance. The CPEI was significantly decreased in the flatfoot condition (Figure), indicating a medialization in center of pressure (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results from this study support our hypothesis of altered kinematics and plantar pressure after flatfoot deformity creation and corroborate previous biomechanical studies of static alignment in PCFD. Increased talonavicular abduction and subtalar eversion are hallmarks of flatfoot deformity, and increased ankle plantarflexion may represent the plantarflexed position of the talus in PCFD. In addition, plantar pressure was significantly medialized with flatfoot deformity. These findings highlight the utility of the gait simulator as a tool for future study of PCFD, especially for analysis of deformity patterns and the specific effects of individual interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8792578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87925782022-01-28 The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait Henry, Jensen K. Hoffman, Jeffrey W. Kim, Jaeyoung Steineman, Brett D. Sturnick, Daniel R. Demetracopoulos, Constantine A. Deland, Jonathan T. Ellis, Scott J. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a 3-dimensional pathology associated with insufficiency of the posterior tibial tendon (PTT), ligamentous failure, joint malalignment, and aberrant plantar force distribution. Existing knowledge of PCFD consists of static measurements, which provide information about the structure of the foot but none about its function. Cadaveric gait models provide an opportunity to measure motion both at the joints primarily affected in PCFD and the adjacent joints that are at risk for progressive subluxation and arthritis. This study sought to develop a flatfoot model for a robotic gait simulator and quantify gait kinematics and plantar pressure between normal and flatfoot conditions, which we hypothesized would be altered after the creation of a flatfoot deformity model. METHODS: Cadaveric specimens were loaded on a 6-degree of freedom robotic gait simulator and the extrinsic tendons were attached to linear motors. Ground reaction forces and muscle forces were optimized utilizing an established iterative process. An 8-camera motion capture system was utilized to calculate joint kinematics using reflective markers attached by k-wires into bone. A plantar pressure mat attached to the force platform was used to calculate the center of pressure excursion index (CPEI) for each condition. The flatfoot model was created via sectioning of the spring ligament and medial talonavicular joint capsule followed by cyclic axial compression until 5-15° of talonavicular abduction was achieved in a static, loaded pose. Testing of the flatfoot state was then performed with inactivation of the PTT. Bias-corrected bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were constructed from the repeated measures difference between flatfoot and normal conditions. Paired t-tests were used to compare the CPEI between conditions. RESULTS: Twelve mid-tibia cadaveric specimens (mean age 73 years, 8 female) with no prior foot/ankle surgery were used. There were significant differences in kinematics between normal and PCFD conditions at the ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular joints (Figure). There was significantly increased ankle plantar flexion in flatfoot in the first 80% of stance phase. There was significantly greater subtalar eversion in flatfoot compared to normal from 10-90% of stance phase. Talonavicular abduction and eversion were also significantly greater in flatfoot from 10-100% of stance. The CPEI was significantly decreased in the flatfoot condition (Figure), indicating a medialization in center of pressure (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results from this study support our hypothesis of altered kinematics and plantar pressure after flatfoot deformity creation and corroborate previous biomechanical studies of static alignment in PCFD. Increased talonavicular abduction and subtalar eversion are hallmarks of flatfoot deformity, and increased ankle plantarflexion may represent the plantarflexed position of the talus in PCFD. In addition, plantar pressure was significantly medialized with flatfoot deformity. These findings highlight the utility of the gait simulator as a tool for future study of PCFD, especially for analysis of deformity patterns and the specific effects of individual interventions. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8792578/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00237 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Henry, Jensen K.
Hoffman, Jeffrey W.
Kim, Jaeyoung
Steineman, Brett D.
Sturnick, Daniel R.
Demetracopoulos, Constantine A.
Deland, Jonathan T.
Ellis, Scott J.
The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait
title The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait
title_full The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait
title_fullStr The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait
title_short The Impact of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Foot & Ankle Kinematics and Plantar Pressure During Simulated Gait
title_sort impact of progressive collapsing foot deformity on foot & ankle kinematics and plantar pressure during simulated gait
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792578/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00237
work_keys_str_mv AT henryjensenk theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT hoffmanjeffreyw theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT kimjaeyoung theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT steinemanbrettd theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT sturnickdanielr theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT demetracopoulosconstantinea theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT delandjonathant theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT ellisscottj theimpactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT henryjensenk impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT hoffmanjeffreyw impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT kimjaeyoung impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT steinemanbrettd impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT sturnickdanielr impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT demetracopoulosconstantinea impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT delandjonathant impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait
AT ellisscottj impactofprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityonfootanklekinematicsandplantarpressureduringsimulatedgait