Cargando…

Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis

CATEGORY: Ankle; Hindfoot; Sports; Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Restoration of functional plantarflexion of the ankle joint following chronic Achilles injury is achieved through transfer of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon. Fixation of the FHL tendon transfer with a cortical button tension sli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neary, Kaitlin C., McClish, Sarah J., Khoury, Anthony N., Denove, Nick, Wijdicks, Coen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792693/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00374
_version_ 1784640430985445376
author Neary, Kaitlin C.
McClish, Sarah J.
Khoury, Anthony N.
Denove, Nick
Wijdicks, Coen A.
author_facet Neary, Kaitlin C.
McClish, Sarah J.
Khoury, Anthony N.
Denove, Nick
Wijdicks, Coen A.
author_sort Neary, Kaitlin C.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle; Hindfoot; Sports; Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Restoration of functional plantarflexion of the ankle joint following chronic Achilles injury is achieved through transfer of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon. Fixation of the FHL tendon transfer with a cortical button tension slide technique is an advancement that has not been measured against traditional methods. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical differences between a single biotenodesis screw versus biotenodesis screw with cortical button tension slide technique for the fixation of FHL transfer. The authors hypothesize a biomechanical advantage for the tension slide technique compared to the biotenodesis screw alone for fixation of the flexor hallucis longus in chronic Achilles pathology. METHODS: 12 pairs (n=24) of fresh-frozen cadaveric tibia-to-toe samples (6 male, 6 female) were utilized to assess the biomechanics of FHL tendon transfer fixation. All specimens underwent bone density analysis. Each pair of cadaveric samples were randomized to receive either the biotenodesis screw or the tension slide technique. FHL tendon transfer was performed via standard technique using a 6.25x15mm biotenodesis screw with the foot in 20 degrees plantarflexion. A 2.6x12mm cortical button was inserted and FHL tendon was introduced with a tension-slide technique. Biomechanical loading was applied between 20N and 60N at a rate of 1Hz for 100 cycles. Post-cyclic load to failure occurred at 1.25mm/sec. Cyclic displacement, structural stiffness, and ultimate load were derived from resultant load-displacement curves. Student t-tests were used to evaluate significant effects between both FHL tendon transfer techniques. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess interactions between bone density and strength of FHL tendon transfer. RESULTS: Average tendon diameter of the 24 FHL samples was 5.44+-0.46 mm. Average bone density for all 24 calcaneus samples was determined to be 1.06+-0.08 g/cm(2). Loading data was normalized with respect to bone density and tendon diameter to account for inherent anatomical differences between cadaveric specimens. The addition of a cortical button for FHL transfer to the calcaneus did not significantly affect cyclic displacement (0.78+-0.52mm vs 0.87+-0.80mm) or structural stiffness (162.11+- 43.34N/mm vs. 167.57+-49.19N/mm). Addition of the cortical button to the FHL tendon transfer construct resulted in a 34% significant increase in ultimate load (343.72+-68.93 N) compared to biotenodesis screw alone (255.62+-77.17 N) (p=0.0002). Linear regression analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between bone density and FHL tendon transfer technique. CONCLUSION: Enhanced strength can be achieved for Achilles pathology repaired with FHL tendon transfer utilizing a biotenodesis screw and cortical button tension slide technique demonstrated by a statistically significant 34% increase in ultimate load, subsequent to cyclic loading. Cortical buttons in the setting of FHL tendon transfer to the calcaneus offers an additional level of support in the case of extreme tendon transfer failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8792693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87926932022-01-28 Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis Neary, Kaitlin C. McClish, Sarah J. Khoury, Anthony N. Denove, Nick Wijdicks, Coen A. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Hindfoot; Sports; Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Restoration of functional plantarflexion of the ankle joint following chronic Achilles injury is achieved through transfer of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon. Fixation of the FHL tendon transfer with a cortical button tension slide technique is an advancement that has not been measured against traditional methods. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical differences between a single biotenodesis screw versus biotenodesis screw with cortical button tension slide technique for the fixation of FHL transfer. The authors hypothesize a biomechanical advantage for the tension slide technique compared to the biotenodesis screw alone for fixation of the flexor hallucis longus in chronic Achilles pathology. METHODS: 12 pairs (n=24) of fresh-frozen cadaveric tibia-to-toe samples (6 male, 6 female) were utilized to assess the biomechanics of FHL tendon transfer fixation. All specimens underwent bone density analysis. Each pair of cadaveric samples were randomized to receive either the biotenodesis screw or the tension slide technique. FHL tendon transfer was performed via standard technique using a 6.25x15mm biotenodesis screw with the foot in 20 degrees plantarflexion. A 2.6x12mm cortical button was inserted and FHL tendon was introduced with a tension-slide technique. Biomechanical loading was applied between 20N and 60N at a rate of 1Hz for 100 cycles. Post-cyclic load to failure occurred at 1.25mm/sec. Cyclic displacement, structural stiffness, and ultimate load were derived from resultant load-displacement curves. Student t-tests were used to evaluate significant effects between both FHL tendon transfer techniques. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess interactions between bone density and strength of FHL tendon transfer. RESULTS: Average tendon diameter of the 24 FHL samples was 5.44+-0.46 mm. Average bone density for all 24 calcaneus samples was determined to be 1.06+-0.08 g/cm(2). Loading data was normalized with respect to bone density and tendon diameter to account for inherent anatomical differences between cadaveric specimens. The addition of a cortical button for FHL transfer to the calcaneus did not significantly affect cyclic displacement (0.78+-0.52mm vs 0.87+-0.80mm) or structural stiffness (162.11+- 43.34N/mm vs. 167.57+-49.19N/mm). Addition of the cortical button to the FHL tendon transfer construct resulted in a 34% significant increase in ultimate load (343.72+-68.93 N) compared to biotenodesis screw alone (255.62+-77.17 N) (p=0.0002). Linear regression analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between bone density and FHL tendon transfer technique. CONCLUSION: Enhanced strength can be achieved for Achilles pathology repaired with FHL tendon transfer utilizing a biotenodesis screw and cortical button tension slide technique demonstrated by a statistically significant 34% increase in ultimate load, subsequent to cyclic loading. Cortical buttons in the setting of FHL tendon transfer to the calcaneus offers an additional level of support in the case of extreme tendon transfer failure. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8792693/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00374 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Neary, Kaitlin C.
McClish, Sarah J.
Khoury, Anthony N.
Denove, Nick
Wijdicks, Coen A.
Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis
title Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_full Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_fullStr Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_short Single Biotenodesis Screw vs Biotenodesis Screw with Cortical Button Tension Slide Technique for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer: A Biomechanical Analysis
title_sort single biotenodesis screw vs biotenodesis screw with cortical button tension slide technique for flexor hallucis longus transfer: a biomechanical analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792693/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00374
work_keys_str_mv AT nearykaitlinc singlebiotenodesisscrewvsbiotenodesisscrewwithcorticalbuttontensionslidetechniqueforflexorhallucislongustransferabiomechanicalanalysis
AT mcclishsarahj singlebiotenodesisscrewvsbiotenodesisscrewwithcorticalbuttontensionslidetechniqueforflexorhallucislongustransferabiomechanicalanalysis
AT khouryanthonyn singlebiotenodesisscrewvsbiotenodesisscrewwithcorticalbuttontensionslidetechniqueforflexorhallucislongustransferabiomechanicalanalysis
AT denovenick singlebiotenodesisscrewvsbiotenodesisscrewwithcorticalbuttontensionslidetechniqueforflexorhallucislongustransferabiomechanicalanalysis
AT wijdickscoena singlebiotenodesisscrewvsbiotenodesisscrewwithcorticalbuttontensionslidetechniqueforflexorhallucislongustransferabiomechanicalanalysis