Cargando…
Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non‐regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literatur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126734 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025 |
_version_ | 1784640477070360576 |
---|---|
author | Tayeh, Christine Mannino, Maria Rosaria Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara Gachet, Emmanuel Candresse, Thierry Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Jeger, Michael John |
author_facet | Tayeh, Christine Mannino, Maria Rosaria Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara Gachet, Emmanuel Candresse, Thierry Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Jeger, Michael John |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non‐regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literature. The ranking methodology proposed at the end of the pilot phase was based on the scoring of pests under evaluation following 16 criteria related to the steps of the pest risk assessment scheme. The multicriteria matrix of scores obtained was then submitted to the multicriteria analysis method PROMETHEE. The pilot methodology was tested on a limited number of pests (14 pests identified during the monitoring activity, and 4 ‘control’ pests whose well‐known risk should be reflected either in a positive or negative score), then applied on all non‐regulated pests identified through the media and scientific literature monitoring in the first 2 years of the project. After having collected feedback from the targeted final users (EU risk managers), the methodology underwent a few refinements: (i) implementation of the methodology to a set of already assessed reference pests from EFSA opinions, (ii) exclusions of three criteria from the scoring phase, (iii) identification of pests proposed for further action (‘positive’ pests), using a threshold defined after scoring the reference pests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8792881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87928812022-02-04 Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU Tayeh, Christine Mannino, Maria Rosaria Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara Gachet, Emmanuel Candresse, Thierry Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Jeger, Michael John EFSA J Scientific Report Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non‐regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literature. The ranking methodology proposed at the end of the pilot phase was based on the scoring of pests under evaluation following 16 criteria related to the steps of the pest risk assessment scheme. The multicriteria matrix of scores obtained was then submitted to the multicriteria analysis method PROMETHEE. The pilot methodology was tested on a limited number of pests (14 pests identified during the monitoring activity, and 4 ‘control’ pests whose well‐known risk should be reflected either in a positive or negative score), then applied on all non‐regulated pests identified through the media and scientific literature monitoring in the first 2 years of the project. After having collected feedback from the targeted final users (EU risk managers), the methodology underwent a few refinements: (i) implementation of the methodology to a set of already assessed reference pests from EFSA opinions, (ii) exclusions of three criteria from the scoring phase, (iii) identification of pests proposed for further action (‘positive’ pests), using a threshold defined after scoring the reference pests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8792881/ /pubmed/35126734 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025 Text en © 2022 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Report Tayeh, Christine Mannino, Maria Rosaria Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara Gachet, Emmanuel Candresse, Thierry Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Jeger, Michael John Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU |
title | Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU |
title_full | Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU |
title_fullStr | Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU |
title_full_unstemmed | Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU |
title_short | Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU |
title_sort | proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the eu |
topic | Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126734 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT tayehchristine proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT manninomariarosaria proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT mosbachschulzolaf proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT stancanelligiuseppe proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT tramontinisara proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT gachetemmanuel proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT candressethierry proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT jaquesmiretjosepanton proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu AT jegermichaeljohn proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu |