Cargando…

Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU

Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non‐regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literatur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tayeh, Christine, Mannino, Maria Rosaria, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Stancanelli, Giuseppe, Tramontini, Sara, Gachet, Emmanuel, Candresse, Thierry, Jaques Miret, Josep Anton, Jeger, Michael John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126734
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025
_version_ 1784640477070360576
author Tayeh, Christine
Mannino, Maria Rosaria
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
Gachet, Emmanuel
Candresse, Thierry
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Jeger, Michael John
author_facet Tayeh, Christine
Mannino, Maria Rosaria
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
Gachet, Emmanuel
Candresse, Thierry
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Jeger, Michael John
collection PubMed
description Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non‐regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literature. The ranking methodology proposed at the end of the pilot phase was based on the scoring of pests under evaluation following 16 criteria related to the steps of the pest risk assessment scheme. The multicriteria matrix of scores obtained was then submitted to the multicriteria analysis method PROMETHEE. The pilot methodology was tested on a limited number of pests (14 pests identified during the monitoring activity, and 4 ‘control’ pests whose well‐known risk should be reflected either in a positive or negative score), then applied on all non‐regulated pests identified through the media and scientific literature monitoring in the first 2 years of the project. After having collected feedback from the targeted final users (EU risk managers), the methodology underwent a few refinements: (i) implementation of the methodology to a set of already assessed reference pests from EFSA opinions, (ii) exclusions of three criteria from the scoring phase, (iii) identification of pests proposed for further action (‘positive’ pests), using a threshold defined after scoring the reference pests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8792881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87928812022-02-04 Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU Tayeh, Christine Mannino, Maria Rosaria Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara Gachet, Emmanuel Candresse, Thierry Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Jeger, Michael John EFSA J Scientific Report Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non‐regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literature. The ranking methodology proposed at the end of the pilot phase was based on the scoring of pests under evaluation following 16 criteria related to the steps of the pest risk assessment scheme. The multicriteria matrix of scores obtained was then submitted to the multicriteria analysis method PROMETHEE. The pilot methodology was tested on a limited number of pests (14 pests identified during the monitoring activity, and 4 ‘control’ pests whose well‐known risk should be reflected either in a positive or negative score), then applied on all non‐regulated pests identified through the media and scientific literature monitoring in the first 2 years of the project. After having collected feedback from the targeted final users (EU risk managers), the methodology underwent a few refinements: (i) implementation of the methodology to a set of already assessed reference pests from EFSA opinions, (ii) exclusions of three criteria from the scoring phase, (iii) identification of pests proposed for further action (‘positive’ pests), using a threshold defined after scoring the reference pests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8792881/ /pubmed/35126734 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025 Text en © 2022 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Report
Tayeh, Christine
Mannino, Maria Rosaria
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
Gachet, Emmanuel
Candresse, Thierry
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Jeger, Michael John
Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
title Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
title_full Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
title_fullStr Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
title_full_unstemmed Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
title_short Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU
title_sort proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the eu
topic Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126734
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025
work_keys_str_mv AT proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT tayehchristine proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT manninomariarosaria proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT mosbachschulzolaf proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT stancanelligiuseppe proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT tramontinisara proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT gachetemmanuel proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT candressethierry proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT jaquesmiretjosepanton proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu
AT jegermichaeljohn proposalofarankingmethodologyforplantthreatsintheeu