Cargando…
Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis
BACKGROUND: Wheat and other gluten-containing grains are widely consumed, providing approximately 50% of the caloric intake in both industrialised and developing countries. The widespread diffusion of gluten-containing diets has rapidly led to a sharp increase in celiac disease prevalence. This cond...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.154 |
_version_ | 1784640504685658112 |
---|---|
author | Raiteri, Alberto Granito, Alessandro Giamperoli, Alice Catenaro, Teresa Negrini, Giulia Tovoli, Francesco |
author_facet | Raiteri, Alberto Granito, Alessandro Giamperoli, Alice Catenaro, Teresa Negrini, Giulia Tovoli, Francesco |
author_sort | Raiteri, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Wheat and other gluten-containing grains are widely consumed, providing approximately 50% of the caloric intake in both industrialised and developing countries. The widespread diffusion of gluten-containing diets has rapidly led to a sharp increase in celiac disease prevalence. This condition was thought to be very rare outside Europe and relatively ignored by health professionals and the global media. However, in recent years, the discovery of important diagnostic and pathogenic milestones has led to the emergence of celiac disease (CD) from obscurity to global prominence. These modifications have prompted experts worldwide to identify effective strategies for the diagnosis and follow-up of CD. Different scientific societies, mainly from Europe and America, have proposed guidelines based on CD's most recent evidence. AIM: To identify the most recent scientific guidelines on CD, aiming to find and critically analyse the main differences. METHODS: We performed a database search on PubMed selecting papers published between January 2010 and January 2021 in the English language. PubMed was lastly accessed on 1 March 2021. RESULTS: We distinguished guidelines from 7 different scientific societies whose reputation is worldwide recognized and representative of the clinical practice in different geographical regions. Differences were noted in the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis, HLA testing, follow-up protocols, and procedures. CONCLUSION: We found a relatively high concordance between the guidelines for CD. Important modifications have occurred in the last years, especially about the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis in children. Other modifications are expected in the next future and will probably involve the extension of the non-invasive diagnosis to the adult population and the follow-up modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8793016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87930162022-02-03 Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis Raiteri, Alberto Granito, Alessandro Giamperoli, Alice Catenaro, Teresa Negrini, Giulia Tovoli, Francesco World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Wheat and other gluten-containing grains are widely consumed, providing approximately 50% of the caloric intake in both industrialised and developing countries. The widespread diffusion of gluten-containing diets has rapidly led to a sharp increase in celiac disease prevalence. This condition was thought to be very rare outside Europe and relatively ignored by health professionals and the global media. However, in recent years, the discovery of important diagnostic and pathogenic milestones has led to the emergence of celiac disease (CD) from obscurity to global prominence. These modifications have prompted experts worldwide to identify effective strategies for the diagnosis and follow-up of CD. Different scientific societies, mainly from Europe and America, have proposed guidelines based on CD's most recent evidence. AIM: To identify the most recent scientific guidelines on CD, aiming to find and critically analyse the main differences. METHODS: We performed a database search on PubMed selecting papers published between January 2010 and January 2021 in the English language. PubMed was lastly accessed on 1 March 2021. RESULTS: We distinguished guidelines from 7 different scientific societies whose reputation is worldwide recognized and representative of the clinical practice in different geographical regions. Differences were noted in the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis, HLA testing, follow-up protocols, and procedures. CONCLUSION: We found a relatively high concordance between the guidelines for CD. Important modifications have occurred in the last years, especially about the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis in children. Other modifications are expected in the next future and will probably involve the extension of the non-invasive diagnosis to the adult population and the follow-up modalities. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-01-07 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8793016/ /pubmed/35125825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.154 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Raiteri, Alberto Granito, Alessandro Giamperoli, Alice Catenaro, Teresa Negrini, Giulia Tovoli, Francesco Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis |
title | Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis |
title_full | Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis |
title_fullStr | Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis |
title_short | Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis |
title_sort | current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: a systematic review with comparative analysis |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raiterialberto currentguidelinesforthemanagementofceliacdiseaseasystematicreviewwithcomparativeanalysis AT granitoalessandro currentguidelinesforthemanagementofceliacdiseaseasystematicreviewwithcomparativeanalysis AT giamperolialice currentguidelinesforthemanagementofceliacdiseaseasystematicreviewwithcomparativeanalysis AT catenaroteresa currentguidelinesforthemanagementofceliacdiseaseasystematicreviewwithcomparativeanalysis AT negrinigiulia currentguidelinesforthemanagementofceliacdiseaseasystematicreviewwithcomparativeanalysis AT tovolifrancesco currentguidelinesforthemanagementofceliacdiseaseasystematicreviewwithcomparativeanalysis |