Cargando…

The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health

BACKGROUND: Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh, Khordastan, Firoozeh, Fatehi, Farhad, Samzadeh, Hamidreza, Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
_version_ 1784640539184857088
author Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh
Khordastan, Firoozeh
Fatehi, Farhad
Samzadeh, Hamidreza
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
author_facet Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh
Khordastan, Firoozeh
Fatehi, Farhad
Samzadeh, Hamidreza
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
author_sort Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the frequently used questionnaires for evaluating the mentioned outcomes of mHealth services. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for conducting this review in April 2021. Papers that used a referenced questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction, usability, acceptance, or quality outcomes of mHealth were included. The first author’s name, year of publication, evaluation outcome, and evaluation questionnaire were extracted from relevant papers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 247 papers were included in the study. Questionnaires were used for usability (40%), quality (34.5%), acceptance (8.5%), and satisfaction (4%) outcomes, respectively. System usability scale (36.5%), mobile application rating scale (35.5%), post study system usability questionnaire (6%), user mobile application rating scale (5%), technology acceptance model (4.5%), computer system usability questionnaire (2.5%), net promoter score (2%), health information technology usability evaluation scale (2%), the usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use (1.5%), client satisfaction questionnaire (1.5%), unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (1.5%), questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (1%), user experience questionnaire (1%), and after-scenario questionnaire (1%) were the most used questionnaires, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the existence of special questionnaires for evaluating several outcomes of mHealth, general questionnaires with fewer items and higher reliability have been used more frequently. Researchers should pay more attention to questionnaires with a goal-based design. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8793175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87931752022-02-03 The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh Khordastan, Firoozeh Fatehi, Farhad Samzadeh, Hamidreza Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the frequently used questionnaires for evaluating the mentioned outcomes of mHealth services. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for conducting this review in April 2021. Papers that used a referenced questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction, usability, acceptance, or quality outcomes of mHealth were included. The first author’s name, year of publication, evaluation outcome, and evaluation questionnaire were extracted from relevant papers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 247 papers were included in the study. Questionnaires were used for usability (40%), quality (34.5%), acceptance (8.5%), and satisfaction (4%) outcomes, respectively. System usability scale (36.5%), mobile application rating scale (35.5%), post study system usability questionnaire (6%), user mobile application rating scale (5%), technology acceptance model (4.5%), computer system usability questionnaire (2.5%), net promoter score (2%), health information technology usability evaluation scale (2%), the usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use (1.5%), client satisfaction questionnaire (1.5%), unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (1.5%), questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (1%), user experience questionnaire (1%), and after-scenario questionnaire (1%) were the most used questionnaires, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the existence of special questionnaires for evaluating several outcomes of mHealth, general questionnaires with fewer items and higher reliability have been used more frequently. Researchers should pay more attention to questionnaires with a goal-based design. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2. BioMed Central 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8793175/ /pubmed/35081953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh
Khordastan, Firoozeh
Fatehi, Farhad
Samzadeh, Hamidreza
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
title The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
title_full The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
title_fullStr The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
title_full_unstemmed The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
title_short The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
title_sort most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hajesmaeelgoharisadrieh themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT khordastanfiroozeh themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT fatehifarhad themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT samzadehhamidreza themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT bahaadinbeigykambiz themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT hajesmaeelgoharisadrieh mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT khordastanfiroozeh mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT fatehifarhad mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT samzadehhamidreza mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth
AT bahaadinbeigykambiz mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth