Cargando…
The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
BACKGROUND: Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the f...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2 |
_version_ | 1784640539184857088 |
---|---|
author | Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh Khordastan, Firoozeh Fatehi, Farhad Samzadeh, Hamidreza Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz |
author_facet | Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh Khordastan, Firoozeh Fatehi, Farhad Samzadeh, Hamidreza Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz |
author_sort | Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the frequently used questionnaires for evaluating the mentioned outcomes of mHealth services. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for conducting this review in April 2021. Papers that used a referenced questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction, usability, acceptance, or quality outcomes of mHealth were included. The first author’s name, year of publication, evaluation outcome, and evaluation questionnaire were extracted from relevant papers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 247 papers were included in the study. Questionnaires were used for usability (40%), quality (34.5%), acceptance (8.5%), and satisfaction (4%) outcomes, respectively. System usability scale (36.5%), mobile application rating scale (35.5%), post study system usability questionnaire (6%), user mobile application rating scale (5%), technology acceptance model (4.5%), computer system usability questionnaire (2.5%), net promoter score (2%), health information technology usability evaluation scale (2%), the usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use (1.5%), client satisfaction questionnaire (1.5%), unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (1.5%), questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (1%), user experience questionnaire (1%), and after-scenario questionnaire (1%) were the most used questionnaires, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the existence of special questionnaires for evaluating several outcomes of mHealth, general questionnaires with fewer items and higher reliability have been used more frequently. Researchers should pay more attention to questionnaires with a goal-based design. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8793175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87931752022-02-03 The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh Khordastan, Firoozeh Fatehi, Farhad Samzadeh, Hamidreza Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the frequently used questionnaires for evaluating the mentioned outcomes of mHealth services. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for conducting this review in April 2021. Papers that used a referenced questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction, usability, acceptance, or quality outcomes of mHealth were included. The first author’s name, year of publication, evaluation outcome, and evaluation questionnaire were extracted from relevant papers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 247 papers were included in the study. Questionnaires were used for usability (40%), quality (34.5%), acceptance (8.5%), and satisfaction (4%) outcomes, respectively. System usability scale (36.5%), mobile application rating scale (35.5%), post study system usability questionnaire (6%), user mobile application rating scale (5%), technology acceptance model (4.5%), computer system usability questionnaire (2.5%), net promoter score (2%), health information technology usability evaluation scale (2%), the usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use (1.5%), client satisfaction questionnaire (1.5%), unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (1.5%), questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (1%), user experience questionnaire (1%), and after-scenario questionnaire (1%) were the most used questionnaires, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the existence of special questionnaires for evaluating several outcomes of mHealth, general questionnaires with fewer items and higher reliability have been used more frequently. Researchers should pay more attention to questionnaires with a goal-based design. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2. BioMed Central 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8793175/ /pubmed/35081953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh Khordastan, Firoozeh Fatehi, Farhad Samzadeh, Hamidreza Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health |
title | The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health |
title_full | The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health |
title_fullStr | The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health |
title_full_unstemmed | The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health |
title_short | The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health |
title_sort | most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hajesmaeelgoharisadrieh themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT khordastanfiroozeh themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT fatehifarhad themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT samzadehhamidreza themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT bahaadinbeigykambiz themostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT hajesmaeelgoharisadrieh mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT khordastanfiroozeh mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT fatehifarhad mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT samzadehhamidreza mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth AT bahaadinbeigykambiz mostusedquestionnairesforevaluatingsatisfactionusabilityacceptanceandqualityoutcomesofmobilehealth |