Cargando…

People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition

The way we process language is influenced by our experience. We are more likely to attend to features that proved to be useful in the past. Importantly, the size of individuals’ social network can influence their experience, and consequently, how they process language. In the case of voice recogniti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lev-Ari, Shiri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211030798
_version_ 1784640565132918784
author Lev-Ari, Shiri
author_facet Lev-Ari, Shiri
author_sort Lev-Ari, Shiri
collection PubMed
description The way we process language is influenced by our experience. We are more likely to attend to features that proved to be useful in the past. Importantly, the size of individuals’ social network can influence their experience, and consequently, how they process language. In the case of voice recognition, having a larger social network might provide more variable input and thus enhance the ability to recognise new voices. On the other hand, learning to recognise voices is more demanding and less beneficial for people with a larger social network as they have more speakers to learn yet spend less time with each. This paper tests whether social network size influences voice recognition, and if so, in which direction. Native Dutch speakers listed their social network and performed a voice recognition task. Results showed that people with larger social networks were poorer at learning to recognise voices. Experiment 2 replicated the results with a British sample and English stimuli. Experiment 3 showed that the effect does not generalise to voice recognition in an unfamiliar language suggesting that social network size influences attention to the linguistic rather than non-linguistic markers that differentiate speakers. The studies thus show that our social network size influences our inclination to learn speaker-specific patterns in our environment, and consequently, the development of skills that rely on such learned patterns, such as voice recognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8793288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87932882022-01-28 People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition Lev-Ari, Shiri Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles The way we process language is influenced by our experience. We are more likely to attend to features that proved to be useful in the past. Importantly, the size of individuals’ social network can influence their experience, and consequently, how they process language. In the case of voice recognition, having a larger social network might provide more variable input and thus enhance the ability to recognise new voices. On the other hand, learning to recognise voices is more demanding and less beneficial for people with a larger social network as they have more speakers to learn yet spend less time with each. This paper tests whether social network size influences voice recognition, and if so, in which direction. Native Dutch speakers listed their social network and performed a voice recognition task. Results showed that people with larger social networks were poorer at learning to recognise voices. Experiment 2 replicated the results with a British sample and English stimuli. Experiment 3 showed that the effect does not generalise to voice recognition in an unfamiliar language suggesting that social network size influences attention to the linguistic rather than non-linguistic markers that differentiate speakers. The studies thus show that our social network size influences our inclination to learn speaker-specific patterns in our environment, and consequently, the development of skills that rely on such learned patterns, such as voice recognition. SAGE Publications 2021-07-09 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8793288/ /pubmed/34165366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211030798 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lev-Ari, Shiri
People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition
title People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition
title_full People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition
title_fullStr People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition
title_full_unstemmed People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition
title_short People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition
title_sort people with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211030798
work_keys_str_mv AT levarishiri peoplewithlargersocialnetworksshowpoorervoicerecognition