Cargando…
Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone
In Ottawa, Canada, we initiated protocols to include non-serologic syphilis testing, as direct fluorescence antibody (DFA) for patients with syphilis symptoms. The purpose was to assess the ability of DFA to detect syphilis during acute infection and to determine if non-serologic testing could yield...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09564624211048610 |
_version_ | 1784640569302056960 |
---|---|
author | Orser, Lauren O’Byrne, Patrick |
author_facet | Orser, Lauren O’Byrne, Patrick |
author_sort | Orser, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Ottawa, Canada, we initiated protocols to include non-serologic syphilis testing, as direct fluorescence antibody (DFA) for patients with syphilis symptoms. The purpose was to assess the ability of DFA to detect syphilis during acute infection and to determine if non-serologic testing could yield an increased number of syphilis diagnoses. We reviewed charts of patients of our local sexual health clinic for whom syphilis was suspected. A total of 69 clinical encounters were recorded for 67 unique patients, most of whom were male. The most common symptom was a painless genital lesion. Of the 67 patients, 29 were found to have a new syphilis diagnosis, among whom, 52% had positive syphilis serology and positive DFA, 34% had a positive syphilis serology and negative DFA, and 14% had negative syphilis serology and positive DFA. While DFA testing did not yield an abundance of new cases, it was useful to support findings from syphilis serology or confirm diagnosis where serology was negative. Where available, alternate non-serologic tests, such as nucleic acid amplification tests, should be considered above DFA due to its higher sensitivity for detecting syphilis in primary lesions; however, in clinical situations, when new syphilis infection is suspected, empiric treatment should not be delayed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8793306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87933062022-01-28 Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone Orser, Lauren O’Byrne, Patrick Int J STD AIDS Original Research Articles In Ottawa, Canada, we initiated protocols to include non-serologic syphilis testing, as direct fluorescence antibody (DFA) for patients with syphilis symptoms. The purpose was to assess the ability of DFA to detect syphilis during acute infection and to determine if non-serologic testing could yield an increased number of syphilis diagnoses. We reviewed charts of patients of our local sexual health clinic for whom syphilis was suspected. A total of 69 clinical encounters were recorded for 67 unique patients, most of whom were male. The most common symptom was a painless genital lesion. Of the 67 patients, 29 were found to have a new syphilis diagnosis, among whom, 52% had positive syphilis serology and positive DFA, 34% had a positive syphilis serology and negative DFA, and 14% had negative syphilis serology and positive DFA. While DFA testing did not yield an abundance of new cases, it was useful to support findings from syphilis serology or confirm diagnosis where serology was negative. Where available, alternate non-serologic tests, such as nucleic acid amplification tests, should be considered above DFA due to its higher sensitivity for detecting syphilis in primary lesions; however, in clinical situations, when new syphilis infection is suspected, empiric treatment should not be delayed. SAGE Publications 2021-11-01 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8793306/ /pubmed/34723748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09564624211048610 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Orser, Lauren O’Byrne, Patrick Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone |
title | Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone |
title_full | Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone |
title_fullStr | Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone |
title_short | Direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone |
title_sort | direct fluorescence antibody testing augments syphilis diagnosis, compared to serology alone |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09564624211048610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orserlauren directfluorescenceantibodytestingaugmentssyphilisdiagnosiscomparedtoserologyalone AT obyrnepatrick directfluorescenceantibodytestingaugmentssyphilisdiagnosiscomparedtoserologyalone |