Cargando…

Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers

Choice bundling, in which a single choice produces a series of repeating consequences over time, increases valuation of delayed monetary and non-monetary gains. Interventions derived from this manipulation may be an effective method for mitigating the elevated delay discounting rates observed in cig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stein, Jeffrey S., Brown, Jeremiah M., Tegge, Allison N., Freitas-Lemos, Roberta, Koffarnus, Mikhail N., Bickel, Warren K., Madden, Gregory J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.796502
_version_ 1784640577491435520
author Stein, Jeffrey S.
Brown, Jeremiah M.
Tegge, Allison N.
Freitas-Lemos, Roberta
Koffarnus, Mikhail N.
Bickel, Warren K.
Madden, Gregory J.
author_facet Stein, Jeffrey S.
Brown, Jeremiah M.
Tegge, Allison N.
Freitas-Lemos, Roberta
Koffarnus, Mikhail N.
Bickel, Warren K.
Madden, Gregory J.
author_sort Stein, Jeffrey S.
collection PubMed
description Choice bundling, in which a single choice produces a series of repeating consequences over time, increases valuation of delayed monetary and non-monetary gains. Interventions derived from this manipulation may be an effective method for mitigating the elevated delay discounting rates observed in cigarette smokers. No prior work, however, has investigated whether the effects of choice bundling generalize to reward losses. In the present study, an online panel of cigarette smokers (N = 302), recruited using survey firms Ipsos and InnovateMR, completed assessments for either monetary gains or losses (randomly assigned). In Step 1, participants completed a delay-discounting task to establish Effective Delay 50 (ED50), or the delay required for an outcome to lose half of its value. In Step 2, participants completed three conditions of an adjusting-amount task, choosing between a smaller, sooner (SS) adjusting amount and a larger, later (LL) fixed amount. The bundle size (i.e., number of consequences) was manipulated across conditions, where a single choice produced either 1 (control), 3, or 9 consequences over time (ascending/descending order counterbalanced). The delay to the first LL amount in each condition, as well as the intervals between all additional SS and LL amounts (where applicable), were set to individual participants’ ED50 values from Step 1 to control for differences in discounting of gains and losses. Results from Step 1 showed significantly higher ED50 values (i.e., less discounting) for losses compared to gains (p < 0.001). Results from Step 2 showed that choice bundling significantly increased valuation of both LL gains and losses (p < 0.001), although effects were significantly greater for losses (p < 0.01). Sensitivity analyses replicated these conclusions. Future research should examine the potential clinical utility of choice bundling, such as development of motivational interventions that emphasize both the bundled health gains associated with smoking cessation and the health losses associated with continued smoking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8793342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87933422022-01-28 Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers Stein, Jeffrey S. Brown, Jeremiah M. Tegge, Allison N. Freitas-Lemos, Roberta Koffarnus, Mikhail N. Bickel, Warren K. Madden, Gregory J. Front Behav Neurosci Behavioral Neuroscience Choice bundling, in which a single choice produces a series of repeating consequences over time, increases valuation of delayed monetary and non-monetary gains. Interventions derived from this manipulation may be an effective method for mitigating the elevated delay discounting rates observed in cigarette smokers. No prior work, however, has investigated whether the effects of choice bundling generalize to reward losses. In the present study, an online panel of cigarette smokers (N = 302), recruited using survey firms Ipsos and InnovateMR, completed assessments for either monetary gains or losses (randomly assigned). In Step 1, participants completed a delay-discounting task to establish Effective Delay 50 (ED50), or the delay required for an outcome to lose half of its value. In Step 2, participants completed three conditions of an adjusting-amount task, choosing between a smaller, sooner (SS) adjusting amount and a larger, later (LL) fixed amount. The bundle size (i.e., number of consequences) was manipulated across conditions, where a single choice produced either 1 (control), 3, or 9 consequences over time (ascending/descending order counterbalanced). The delay to the first LL amount in each condition, as well as the intervals between all additional SS and LL amounts (where applicable), were set to individual participants’ ED50 values from Step 1 to control for differences in discounting of gains and losses. Results from Step 1 showed significantly higher ED50 values (i.e., less discounting) for losses compared to gains (p < 0.001). Results from Step 2 showed that choice bundling significantly increased valuation of both LL gains and losses (p < 0.001), although effects were significantly greater for losses (p < 0.01). Sensitivity analyses replicated these conclusions. Future research should examine the potential clinical utility of choice bundling, such as development of motivational interventions that emphasize both the bundled health gains associated with smoking cessation and the health losses associated with continued smoking. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8793342/ /pubmed/35095439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.796502 Text en Copyright © 2022 Stein, Brown, Tegge, Freitas-Lemos, Koffarnus, Bickel and Madden. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Stein, Jeffrey S.
Brown, Jeremiah M.
Tegge, Allison N.
Freitas-Lemos, Roberta
Koffarnus, Mikhail N.
Bickel, Warren K.
Madden, Gregory J.
Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers
title Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers
title_full Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers
title_fullStr Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers
title_full_unstemmed Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers
title_short Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers
title_sort choice bundling increases valuation of delayed losses more than gains in cigarette smokers
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.796502
work_keys_str_mv AT steinjeffreys choicebundlingincreasesvaluationofdelayedlossesmorethangainsincigarettesmokers
AT brownjeremiahm choicebundlingincreasesvaluationofdelayedlossesmorethangainsincigarettesmokers
AT teggeallisonn choicebundlingincreasesvaluationofdelayedlossesmorethangainsincigarettesmokers
AT freitaslemosroberta choicebundlingincreasesvaluationofdelayedlossesmorethangainsincigarettesmokers
AT koffarnusmikhailn choicebundlingincreasesvaluationofdelayedlossesmorethangainsincigarettesmokers
AT bickelwarrenk choicebundlingincreasesvaluationofdelayedlossesmorethangainsincigarettesmokers
AT maddengregoryj choicebundlingincreasesvaluationofdelayedlossesmorethangainsincigarettesmokers