Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement
CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis of the current study was that IONA in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793393/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00363 |
_version_ | 1784640589247021056 |
---|---|
author | Mercer, Nathaniel P. Samsonov, Alan Dankert, John Delmonte, Rick J. Stornebrink, Tobias Gianakos, Arianna L. Kerkhoffs, Gino Kennedy, John G. Dahmen, Jari |
author_facet | Mercer, Nathaniel P. Samsonov, Alan Dankert, John Delmonte, Rick J. Stornebrink, Tobias Gianakos, Arianna L. Kerkhoffs, Gino Kennedy, John G. Dahmen, Jari |
author_sort | Mercer, Nathaniel P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis of the current study was that IONA in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition and that using IONA would accelerate recovery to sports-specific activities compared to standard arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study investigating patients who underwent IONA for posterior ankle impingement between 2019 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the following methods preoperatively and at final follow-up: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. A five-point Likert scale regarding patient satisfaction was evaluated at final follow-up. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this study, which included 4 males and 6 females with a mean age of 41.9 +- 15.5 years (range, 24-66 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.3 +- 6.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.1 - 39.9). The mean follow-up time was 13.3 +- 2.9 months (range, 11-17 months). The mean PROMIS Pain Intensity T-score significantly decreased from 57.5 +- 8.4 preoperatively to 49.5 +- 5.5 at final follow-up (p<0.001). The mean PROMIS Pain Interference T-score decreased from 69.0 +- 5.8 preoperatively to 63.1 +- 5.8 at final follow-up (p<0.001). There were 7 patients who participated in sports activity prior to the IONA-arthroscopy procedure. Of those, 7 patients (100%) returned to their sports activities. The median time to return to sports was 4.1 weeks (range, 1 to 14 weeks). Lastly, 10 patients (100%) expressed willingness to undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that IONA treatment of posterior ankle impingement results in significant pain reduction, a low complication rate and excellent patient-reported outcomes with high rates of return to work/sport. Additionally, IONA for posterior ankle impingement leads to high patient satisfaction with a significant willingness to undergo the same procedure again. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8793393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87933932022-01-28 Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement Mercer, Nathaniel P. Samsonov, Alan Dankert, John Delmonte, Rick J. Stornebrink, Tobias Gianakos, Arianna L. Kerkhoffs, Gino Kennedy, John G. Dahmen, Jari Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis of the current study was that IONA in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition and that using IONA would accelerate recovery to sports-specific activities compared to standard arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study investigating patients who underwent IONA for posterior ankle impingement between 2019 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the following methods preoperatively and at final follow-up: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. A five-point Likert scale regarding patient satisfaction was evaluated at final follow-up. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this study, which included 4 males and 6 females with a mean age of 41.9 +- 15.5 years (range, 24-66 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.3 +- 6.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.1 - 39.9). The mean follow-up time was 13.3 +- 2.9 months (range, 11-17 months). The mean PROMIS Pain Intensity T-score significantly decreased from 57.5 +- 8.4 preoperatively to 49.5 +- 5.5 at final follow-up (p<0.001). The mean PROMIS Pain Interference T-score decreased from 69.0 +- 5.8 preoperatively to 63.1 +- 5.8 at final follow-up (p<0.001). There were 7 patients who participated in sports activity prior to the IONA-arthroscopy procedure. Of those, 7 patients (100%) returned to their sports activities. The median time to return to sports was 4.1 weeks (range, 1 to 14 weeks). Lastly, 10 patients (100%) expressed willingness to undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that IONA treatment of posterior ankle impingement results in significant pain reduction, a low complication rate and excellent patient-reported outcomes with high rates of return to work/sport. Additionally, IONA for posterior ankle impingement leads to high patient satisfaction with a significant willingness to undergo the same procedure again. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8793393/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00363 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Mercer, Nathaniel P. Samsonov, Alan Dankert, John Delmonte, Rick J. Stornebrink, Tobias Gianakos, Arianna L. Kerkhoffs, Gino Kennedy, John G. Dahmen, Jari Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement |
title | Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of nano arthroscopy in the office setting for the treatment of posterior ankle impingement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793393/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mercernathanielp clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT samsonovalan clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT dankertjohn clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT delmonterickj clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT stornebrinktobias clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT gianakosariannal clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT kerkhoffsgino clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT kennedyjohng clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement AT dahmenjari clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement |