Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement

CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis of the current study was that IONA in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercer, Nathaniel P., Samsonov, Alan, Dankert, John, Delmonte, Rick J., Stornebrink, Tobias, Gianakos, Arianna L., Kerkhoffs, Gino, Kennedy, John G., Dahmen, Jari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793393/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00363
_version_ 1784640589247021056
author Mercer, Nathaniel P.
Samsonov, Alan
Dankert, John
Delmonte, Rick J.
Stornebrink, Tobias
Gianakos, Arianna L.
Kerkhoffs, Gino
Kennedy, John G.
Dahmen, Jari
author_facet Mercer, Nathaniel P.
Samsonov, Alan
Dankert, John
Delmonte, Rick J.
Stornebrink, Tobias
Gianakos, Arianna L.
Kerkhoffs, Gino
Kennedy, John G.
Dahmen, Jari
author_sort Mercer, Nathaniel P.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis of the current study was that IONA in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition and that using IONA would accelerate recovery to sports-specific activities compared to standard arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study investigating patients who underwent IONA for posterior ankle impingement between 2019 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the following methods preoperatively and at final follow-up: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. A five-point Likert scale regarding patient satisfaction was evaluated at final follow-up. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this study, which included 4 males and 6 females with a mean age of 41.9 +- 15.5 years (range, 24-66 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.3 +- 6.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.1 - 39.9). The mean follow-up time was 13.3 +- 2.9 months (range, 11-17 months). The mean PROMIS Pain Intensity T-score significantly decreased from 57.5 +- 8.4 preoperatively to 49.5 +- 5.5 at final follow-up (p<0.001). The mean PROMIS Pain Interference T-score decreased from 69.0 +- 5.8 preoperatively to 63.1 +- 5.8 at final follow-up (p<0.001). There were 7 patients who participated in sports activity prior to the IONA-arthroscopy procedure. Of those, 7 patients (100%) returned to their sports activities. The median time to return to sports was 4.1 weeks (range, 1 to 14 weeks). Lastly, 10 patients (100%) expressed willingness to undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that IONA treatment of posterior ankle impingement results in significant pain reduction, a low complication rate and excellent patient-reported outcomes with high rates of return to work/sport. Additionally, IONA for posterior ankle impingement leads to high patient satisfaction with a significant willingness to undergo the same procedure again.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8793393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87933932022-01-28 Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement Mercer, Nathaniel P. Samsonov, Alan Dankert, John Delmonte, Rick J. Stornebrink, Tobias Gianakos, Arianna L. Kerkhoffs, Gino Kennedy, John G. Dahmen, Jari Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis of the current study was that IONA in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition and that using IONA would accelerate recovery to sports-specific activities compared to standard arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study investigating patients who underwent IONA for posterior ankle impingement between 2019 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the following methods preoperatively and at final follow-up: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. A five-point Likert scale regarding patient satisfaction was evaluated at final follow-up. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this study, which included 4 males and 6 females with a mean age of 41.9 +- 15.5 years (range, 24-66 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.3 +- 6.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.1 - 39.9). The mean follow-up time was 13.3 +- 2.9 months (range, 11-17 months). The mean PROMIS Pain Intensity T-score significantly decreased from 57.5 +- 8.4 preoperatively to 49.5 +- 5.5 at final follow-up (p<0.001). The mean PROMIS Pain Interference T-score decreased from 69.0 +- 5.8 preoperatively to 63.1 +- 5.8 at final follow-up (p<0.001). There were 7 patients who participated in sports activity prior to the IONA-arthroscopy procedure. Of those, 7 patients (100%) returned to their sports activities. The median time to return to sports was 4.1 weeks (range, 1 to 14 weeks). Lastly, 10 patients (100%) expressed willingness to undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that IONA treatment of posterior ankle impingement results in significant pain reduction, a low complication rate and excellent patient-reported outcomes with high rates of return to work/sport. Additionally, IONA for posterior ankle impingement leads to high patient satisfaction with a significant willingness to undergo the same procedure again. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8793393/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00363 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Mercer, Nathaniel P.
Samsonov, Alan
Dankert, John
Delmonte, Rick J.
Stornebrink, Tobias
Gianakos, Arianna L.
Kerkhoffs, Gino
Kennedy, John G.
Dahmen, Jari
Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement
title Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement
title_sort clinical outcomes of nano arthroscopy in the office setting for the treatment of posterior ankle impingement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793393/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00363
work_keys_str_mv AT mercernathanielp clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT samsonovalan clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT dankertjohn clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT delmonterickj clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT stornebrinktobias clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT gianakosariannal clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT kerkhoffsgino clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT kennedyjohng clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement
AT dahmenjari clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofposteriorankleimpingement