Cargando…
Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM)
CATEGORY: Ankle; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The PUMA System (Panther Orthopedics, Sunnyvale, CA) is an FDA cleared. superelastic, nitinol based fixation device for the ankle syndesmosis which provides stabilization without over-compression or loosening due to creep from c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793410/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00186 |
_version_ | 1784640593524162560 |
---|---|
author | Ellington, J. Kent Stecco, Kathy |
author_facet | Ellington, J. Kent Stecco, Kathy |
author_sort | Ellington, J. Kent |
collection | PubMed |
description | CATEGORY: Ankle; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The PUMA System (Panther Orthopedics, Sunnyvale, CA) is an FDA cleared. superelastic, nitinol based fixation device for the ankle syndesmosis which provides stabilization without over-compression or loosening due to creep from cyclic loading. Objective The objective of this study was to test resistance to lengthening (creep) of the PUMA System in cyclic fatigue testing. METHODS: Five PUMA System devices, each having a nitinol Body consisting of six layers, were cycle-tested between 20/40 pounds per cubic foot (lb/ft(3)) polyurethane foam Bone Blocks (Figure 1).[1] The PUMA System devices were set up with an initial device Active Length of approximately 66 millimeters (mm) between their polyether ether ketone (PEEK) Anchor buttons. All devices were tightened to a minimum of 11.1 Newtons (2.5 pounds force) and cycled at 5 cycles per second (5 Hz) for 4500 cycles to 2.4 mm displacement. Device Active Length was recorded pre- and post-testing. Devices were visually inspected for any break in the 30 nitinol layers. [1] ASTM F1839: Standard Specification for Rigid Polyurethane Foam for Use as a Standard Material for Testing Orthopedic Devices and Instruments. RESULTS: None of the 30 layers incorporated in the 5 PUMA System(TM) device Bodies failed due to cyclic fatigue. Also, there was little-to-no difference between pre- and post-testing Active Length (Figure 2). More specifically an average increase of only 0.2% in length with a with a Standard Deviation of 0.16% evidences no significant creep (Table 1). CONCLUSION: The PUMA System(TM) allows for ankle syndesmosis repair with an implant that experiences no significant creep as demonstrated in cyclic-fatigue testing under challenging displacement cycle testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8793410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87934102022-01-28 Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM) Ellington, J. Kent Stecco, Kathy Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The PUMA System (Panther Orthopedics, Sunnyvale, CA) is an FDA cleared. superelastic, nitinol based fixation device for the ankle syndesmosis which provides stabilization without over-compression or loosening due to creep from cyclic loading. Objective The objective of this study was to test resistance to lengthening (creep) of the PUMA System in cyclic fatigue testing. METHODS: Five PUMA System devices, each having a nitinol Body consisting of six layers, were cycle-tested between 20/40 pounds per cubic foot (lb/ft(3)) polyurethane foam Bone Blocks (Figure 1).[1] The PUMA System devices were set up with an initial device Active Length of approximately 66 millimeters (mm) between their polyether ether ketone (PEEK) Anchor buttons. All devices were tightened to a minimum of 11.1 Newtons (2.5 pounds force) and cycled at 5 cycles per second (5 Hz) for 4500 cycles to 2.4 mm displacement. Device Active Length was recorded pre- and post-testing. Devices were visually inspected for any break in the 30 nitinol layers. [1] ASTM F1839: Standard Specification for Rigid Polyurethane Foam for Use as a Standard Material for Testing Orthopedic Devices and Instruments. RESULTS: None of the 30 layers incorporated in the 5 PUMA System(TM) device Bodies failed due to cyclic fatigue. Also, there was little-to-no difference between pre- and post-testing Active Length (Figure 2). More specifically an average increase of only 0.2% in length with a with a Standard Deviation of 0.16% evidences no significant creep (Table 1). CONCLUSION: The PUMA System(TM) allows for ankle syndesmosis repair with an implant that experiences no significant creep as demonstrated in cyclic-fatigue testing under challenging displacement cycle testing. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8793410/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00186 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Ellington, J. Kent Stecco, Kathy Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM) |
title | Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM) |
title_full | Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM) |
title_fullStr | Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM) |
title_full_unstemmed | Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM) |
title_short | Cyclic Fatigue and Creep Resistance Testing of the PUMA System(TM) |
title_sort | cyclic fatigue and creep resistance testing of the puma system(tm) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793410/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellingtonjkent cyclicfatigueandcreepresistancetestingofthepumasystemtm AT steccokathy cyclicfatigueandcreepresistancetestingofthepumasystemtm |