Cargando…

Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects

To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Scienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiles, Louise K., Kay, Debra, Luker, Julie A., Worley, Anthea, Austin, Jane, Ball, Allan, Bevan, Alan, Cousins, Michael, Dalton, Sarah, Hodges, Ellie, Horvat, Lidia, Kerrins, Ellen, Marker, Julie, McKinnon, Michele, McMillan, Penelope, Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra, Smith, Judy, Yeung, David, Hillier, Susan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261808
_version_ 1784640749368770560
author Wiles, Louise K.
Kay, Debra
Luker, Julie A.
Worley, Anthea
Austin, Jane
Ball, Allan
Bevan, Alan
Cousins, Michael
Dalton, Sarah
Hodges, Ellie
Horvat, Lidia
Kerrins, Ellen
Marker, Julie
McKinnon, Michele
McMillan, Penelope
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra
Smith, Judy
Yeung, David
Hillier, Susan L.
author_facet Wiles, Louise K.
Kay, Debra
Luker, Julie A.
Worley, Anthea
Austin, Jane
Ball, Allan
Bevan, Alan
Cousins, Michael
Dalton, Sarah
Hodges, Ellie
Horvat, Lidia
Kerrins, Ellen
Marker, Julie
McKinnon, Michele
McMillan, Penelope
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra
Smith, Judy
Yeung, David
Hillier, Susan L.
author_sort Wiles, Louise K.
collection PubMed
description To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Science) up to February 2020. Selection criteria included randomised controlled trials assessing consumer engagement in developing health care policy, research, or health services. The International Association for Public Participation, Spectrum of Public Participation was used to identify, describe, compare and analyse consumer engagement. Outcome measures were effects on people; effects on the policy/research/health care services; or process outcomes. We included 23 randomised controlled trials with a moderate or high risk of bias, involving 136,265 participants. Most consumer engagement strategies adopted a consultative approach during the development phase of interventions, targeted to health services. Based on four large cluster-randomised controlled trials, there is evidence that consumer engagement in the development and delivery of health services to enhance the care of pregnant women results in a reduction in neonatal, but not maternal, mortality. From other trials, there is evidence that involving consumers in developing patient information material results in material that is more relevant, readable and understandable for patients, and can improve knowledge. Mixed effects are reported of consumer-engagement on the development and/or implementation of health professional training. There is some evidence that using consumer interviewers instead of staff in satisfaction surveys can have a small influence on the results. There is some evidence that consumers may have a role in identifying a broader range of health care priorities that are complementary to those from professionals. There is some evidence that consumer engagement in monitoring and evaluating health services may impact perceptions of patient safety or quality of life. There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effects of consumer engagement on the relevance and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services. Health care consumers, providers, researchers and funders should continue to employ evidence-informed consumer engagement in their jurisdictions, with embedded evaluation. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018102595.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87940882022-01-28 Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects Wiles, Louise K. Kay, Debra Luker, Julie A. Worley, Anthea Austin, Jane Ball, Allan Bevan, Alan Cousins, Michael Dalton, Sarah Hodges, Ellie Horvat, Lidia Kerrins, Ellen Marker, Julie McKinnon, Michele McMillan, Penelope Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Smith, Judy Yeung, David Hillier, Susan L. PLoS One Research Article To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Science) up to February 2020. Selection criteria included randomised controlled trials assessing consumer engagement in developing health care policy, research, or health services. The International Association for Public Participation, Spectrum of Public Participation was used to identify, describe, compare and analyse consumer engagement. Outcome measures were effects on people; effects on the policy/research/health care services; or process outcomes. We included 23 randomised controlled trials with a moderate or high risk of bias, involving 136,265 participants. Most consumer engagement strategies adopted a consultative approach during the development phase of interventions, targeted to health services. Based on four large cluster-randomised controlled trials, there is evidence that consumer engagement in the development and delivery of health services to enhance the care of pregnant women results in a reduction in neonatal, but not maternal, mortality. From other trials, there is evidence that involving consumers in developing patient information material results in material that is more relevant, readable and understandable for patients, and can improve knowledge. Mixed effects are reported of consumer-engagement on the development and/or implementation of health professional training. There is some evidence that using consumer interviewers instead of staff in satisfaction surveys can have a small influence on the results. There is some evidence that consumers may have a role in identifying a broader range of health care priorities that are complementary to those from professionals. There is some evidence that consumer engagement in monitoring and evaluating health services may impact perceptions of patient safety or quality of life. There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effects of consumer engagement on the relevance and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services. Health care consumers, providers, researchers and funders should continue to employ evidence-informed consumer engagement in their jurisdictions, with embedded evaluation. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018102595. Public Library of Science 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8794088/ /pubmed/35085276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261808 Text en © 2022 Wiles et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wiles, Louise K.
Kay, Debra
Luker, Julie A.
Worley, Anthea
Austin, Jane
Ball, Allan
Bevan, Alan
Cousins, Michael
Dalton, Sarah
Hodges, Ellie
Horvat, Lidia
Kerrins, Ellen
Marker, Julie
McKinnon, Michele
McMillan, Penelope
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra
Smith, Judy
Yeung, David
Hillier, Susan L.
Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
title Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
title_full Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
title_fullStr Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
title_full_unstemmed Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
title_short Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
title_sort consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261808
work_keys_str_mv AT wileslouisek consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT kaydebra consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT lukerjuliea consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT worleyanthea consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT austinjane consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT ballallan consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT bevanalan consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT cousinsmichael consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT daltonsarah consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT hodgesellie consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT horvatlidia consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT kerrinsellen consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT markerjulie consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT mckinnonmichele consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT mcmillanpenelope consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT pinerodeplazamariaalejandra consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT smithjudy consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT yeungdavid consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects
AT hilliersusanl consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects