Cargando…
Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects
To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Scienc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261808 |
_version_ | 1784640749368770560 |
---|---|
author | Wiles, Louise K. Kay, Debra Luker, Julie A. Worley, Anthea Austin, Jane Ball, Allan Bevan, Alan Cousins, Michael Dalton, Sarah Hodges, Ellie Horvat, Lidia Kerrins, Ellen Marker, Julie McKinnon, Michele McMillan, Penelope Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Smith, Judy Yeung, David Hillier, Susan L. |
author_facet | Wiles, Louise K. Kay, Debra Luker, Julie A. Worley, Anthea Austin, Jane Ball, Allan Bevan, Alan Cousins, Michael Dalton, Sarah Hodges, Ellie Horvat, Lidia Kerrins, Ellen Marker, Julie McKinnon, Michele McMillan, Penelope Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Smith, Judy Yeung, David Hillier, Susan L. |
author_sort | Wiles, Louise K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Science) up to February 2020. Selection criteria included randomised controlled trials assessing consumer engagement in developing health care policy, research, or health services. The International Association for Public Participation, Spectrum of Public Participation was used to identify, describe, compare and analyse consumer engagement. Outcome measures were effects on people; effects on the policy/research/health care services; or process outcomes. We included 23 randomised controlled trials with a moderate or high risk of bias, involving 136,265 participants. Most consumer engagement strategies adopted a consultative approach during the development phase of interventions, targeted to health services. Based on four large cluster-randomised controlled trials, there is evidence that consumer engagement in the development and delivery of health services to enhance the care of pregnant women results in a reduction in neonatal, but not maternal, mortality. From other trials, there is evidence that involving consumers in developing patient information material results in material that is more relevant, readable and understandable for patients, and can improve knowledge. Mixed effects are reported of consumer-engagement on the development and/or implementation of health professional training. There is some evidence that using consumer interviewers instead of staff in satisfaction surveys can have a small influence on the results. There is some evidence that consumers may have a role in identifying a broader range of health care priorities that are complementary to those from professionals. There is some evidence that consumer engagement in monitoring and evaluating health services may impact perceptions of patient safety or quality of life. There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effects of consumer engagement on the relevance and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services. Health care consumers, providers, researchers and funders should continue to employ evidence-informed consumer engagement in their jurisdictions, with embedded evaluation. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018102595. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8794088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87940882022-01-28 Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects Wiles, Louise K. Kay, Debra Luker, Julie A. Worley, Anthea Austin, Jane Ball, Allan Bevan, Alan Cousins, Michael Dalton, Sarah Hodges, Ellie Horvat, Lidia Kerrins, Ellen Marker, Julie McKinnon, Michele McMillan, Penelope Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Smith, Judy Yeung, David Hillier, Susan L. PLoS One Research Article To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Science) up to February 2020. Selection criteria included randomised controlled trials assessing consumer engagement in developing health care policy, research, or health services. The International Association for Public Participation, Spectrum of Public Participation was used to identify, describe, compare and analyse consumer engagement. Outcome measures were effects on people; effects on the policy/research/health care services; or process outcomes. We included 23 randomised controlled trials with a moderate or high risk of bias, involving 136,265 participants. Most consumer engagement strategies adopted a consultative approach during the development phase of interventions, targeted to health services. Based on four large cluster-randomised controlled trials, there is evidence that consumer engagement in the development and delivery of health services to enhance the care of pregnant women results in a reduction in neonatal, but not maternal, mortality. From other trials, there is evidence that involving consumers in developing patient information material results in material that is more relevant, readable and understandable for patients, and can improve knowledge. Mixed effects are reported of consumer-engagement on the development and/or implementation of health professional training. There is some evidence that using consumer interviewers instead of staff in satisfaction surveys can have a small influence on the results. There is some evidence that consumers may have a role in identifying a broader range of health care priorities that are complementary to those from professionals. There is some evidence that consumer engagement in monitoring and evaluating health services may impact perceptions of patient safety or quality of life. There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effects of consumer engagement on the relevance and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services. Health care consumers, providers, researchers and funders should continue to employ evidence-informed consumer engagement in their jurisdictions, with embedded evaluation. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018102595. Public Library of Science 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8794088/ /pubmed/35085276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261808 Text en © 2022 Wiles et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wiles, Louise K. Kay, Debra Luker, Julie A. Worley, Anthea Austin, Jane Ball, Allan Bevan, Alan Cousins, Michael Dalton, Sarah Hodges, Ellie Horvat, Lidia Kerrins, Ellen Marker, Julie McKinnon, Michele McMillan, Penelope Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Smith, Judy Yeung, David Hillier, Susan L. Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects |
title | Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects |
title_full | Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects |
title_fullStr | Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects |
title_full_unstemmed | Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects |
title_short | Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects |
title_sort | consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wileslouisek consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT kaydebra consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT lukerjuliea consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT worleyanthea consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT austinjane consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT ballallan consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT bevanalan consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT cousinsmichael consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT daltonsarah consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT hodgesellie consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT horvatlidia consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT kerrinsellen consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT markerjulie consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT mckinnonmichele consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT mcmillanpenelope consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT pinerodeplazamariaalejandra consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT smithjudy consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT yeungdavid consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects AT hilliersusanl consumerengagementinhealthcarepolicyresearchandservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmethodsandeffects |