Cargando…

Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton

BACKGROUND: Robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) uses a powered exoskeleton to support an individual’s body and move their limbs, with the aim of activating latent, pre-existing movement patterns stored in the lower spinal cord called central pattern generators (CPGs) to facilitate stepping. The pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Stephen Clive, White, Matthew, Wilcox, Christopher Richard James, White, Hollie Samantha Forbes, Vanicek, Natalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262915
_version_ 1784640765364797440
author Hayes, Stephen Clive
White, Matthew
Wilcox, Christopher Richard James
White, Hollie Samantha Forbes
Vanicek, Natalie
author_facet Hayes, Stephen Clive
White, Matthew
Wilcox, Christopher Richard James
White, Hollie Samantha Forbes
Vanicek, Natalie
author_sort Hayes, Stephen Clive
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) uses a powered exoskeleton to support an individual’s body and move their limbs, with the aim of activating latent, pre-existing movement patterns stored in the lower spinal cord called central pattern generators (CPGs) to facilitate stepping. The parameters that directly stimulate the stepping CPGs (hip extension and ipsilateral foot unloading) should be targeted to maximise the rehabilitation benefits of these devices. AIM: To compare the biomechanical profiles of individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) and able-bodied individuals inside the ReWalk(TM) powered exoskeleton and to contrast the users’ profiles with the exoskeleton. METHODS: Eight able-bodied and four SCI individuals donned a ReWalk(TM) and walked along a 12-meter walkway, using elbow crutches. Whole-body kinematics of the users and the ReWalk(TM) were captured, along with GRF and temporal-spatial characteristics. Discreet kinematic values were analysed using a Kruskall-Wallis H and Dunn’s post-hoc analysis. Upper-body differences, GRF and temporal-spatial characteristics were analysed using a Mann-Whitney U test (P<0.05). RESULTS: Walking speed ranged from 0.32–0.39m/s. Hip abduction, peak knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion for both the SCI and able-bodied groups presented with significant differences to the ReWalk(TM). The able-bodied group presented significant differences to the ReWalk(TM) for all kinematic variables except frontal plane hip ROM (P = 0.093,δ = -0.56). Sagittal plane pelvic and trunk ROM were significantly greater in the SCI vs. able-bodied (P = 0.004,δ = -1; P = 0.008,δ = -0.94, respectively). Posterior braking force was significantly greater in the SCI group (P = 0.004, δ = -1). DISCUSSION: The different trunk movements used by the SCI group and the capacity for the users’ joint angles to exceed those of the device suggest that biomechanical profiles varied according to the user group. However, upright stepping with the ReWalk(TM) device delivered the appropriate afferent stimulus to activate CPGs as there were no differences in key biomechanical parameters between the two user groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87941442022-01-28 Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton Hayes, Stephen Clive White, Matthew Wilcox, Christopher Richard James White, Hollie Samantha Forbes Vanicek, Natalie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) uses a powered exoskeleton to support an individual’s body and move their limbs, with the aim of activating latent, pre-existing movement patterns stored in the lower spinal cord called central pattern generators (CPGs) to facilitate stepping. The parameters that directly stimulate the stepping CPGs (hip extension and ipsilateral foot unloading) should be targeted to maximise the rehabilitation benefits of these devices. AIM: To compare the biomechanical profiles of individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) and able-bodied individuals inside the ReWalk(TM) powered exoskeleton and to contrast the users’ profiles with the exoskeleton. METHODS: Eight able-bodied and four SCI individuals donned a ReWalk(TM) and walked along a 12-meter walkway, using elbow crutches. Whole-body kinematics of the users and the ReWalk(TM) were captured, along with GRF and temporal-spatial characteristics. Discreet kinematic values were analysed using a Kruskall-Wallis H and Dunn’s post-hoc analysis. Upper-body differences, GRF and temporal-spatial characteristics were analysed using a Mann-Whitney U test (P<0.05). RESULTS: Walking speed ranged from 0.32–0.39m/s. Hip abduction, peak knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion for both the SCI and able-bodied groups presented with significant differences to the ReWalk(TM). The able-bodied group presented significant differences to the ReWalk(TM) for all kinematic variables except frontal plane hip ROM (P = 0.093,δ = -0.56). Sagittal plane pelvic and trunk ROM were significantly greater in the SCI vs. able-bodied (P = 0.004,δ = -1; P = 0.008,δ = -0.94, respectively). Posterior braking force was significantly greater in the SCI group (P = 0.004, δ = -1). DISCUSSION: The different trunk movements used by the SCI group and the capacity for the users’ joint angles to exceed those of the device suggest that biomechanical profiles varied according to the user group. However, upright stepping with the ReWalk(TM) device delivered the appropriate afferent stimulus to activate CPGs as there were no differences in key biomechanical parameters between the two user groups. Public Library of Science 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8794144/ /pubmed/35085340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262915 Text en © 2022 Hayes et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hayes, Stephen Clive
White, Matthew
Wilcox, Christopher Richard James
White, Hollie Samantha Forbes
Vanicek, Natalie
Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton
title Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton
title_full Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton
title_fullStr Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton
title_short Biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton
title_sort biomechanical differences between able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals walking in an overground robotic exoskeleton
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262915
work_keys_str_mv AT hayesstephenclive biomechanicaldifferencesbetweenablebodiedandspinalcordinjuredindividualswalkinginanovergroundroboticexoskeleton
AT whitematthew biomechanicaldifferencesbetweenablebodiedandspinalcordinjuredindividualswalkinginanovergroundroboticexoskeleton
AT wilcoxchristopherrichardjames biomechanicaldifferencesbetweenablebodiedandspinalcordinjuredindividualswalkinginanovergroundroboticexoskeleton
AT whiteholliesamanthaforbes biomechanicaldifferencesbetweenablebodiedandspinalcordinjuredindividualswalkinginanovergroundroboticexoskeleton
AT vaniceknatalie biomechanicaldifferencesbetweenablebodiedandspinalcordinjuredindividualswalkinginanovergroundroboticexoskeleton