Cargando…

Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt

The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon reveals a bottleneck of human information processing: the second of two targets is often missed when they are presented in rapid succession among distractors. In our previous work, we showed that the size of the AB can be changed by applying transcranial direct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reteig, Leon C., Newman, Lionel A., Ridderinkhof, K. Richard, Slagter, Heleen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262718
_version_ 1784640769496186880
author Reteig, Leon C.
Newman, Lionel A.
Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
Slagter, Heleen A.
author_facet Reteig, Leon C.
Newman, Lionel A.
Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
Slagter, Heleen A.
author_sort Reteig, Leon C.
collection PubMed
description The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon reveals a bottleneck of human information processing: the second of two targets is often missed when they are presented in rapid succession among distractors. In our previous work, we showed that the size of the AB can be changed by applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) (London & Slagter, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 756–68, 2021). Although AB size at the group level remained unchanged, the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS were negatively correlated: if a given individual’s AB size decreased from baseline during anodal tDCS, their AB size would increase during cathodal tDCS, and vice versa. Here, we attempted to replicate this finding. We found no group effects of tDCS, as in the original study, but we no longer found a significant negative correlation. We present a series of statistical measures of replication success, all of which confirm that both studies are not in agreement. First, the correlation here is significantly smaller than a conservative estimate of the original correlation. Second, the difference between the correlations is greater than expected due to sampling error, and our data are more consistent with a zero-effect than with the original estimate. Finally, the overall effect when combining both studies is small and not significant. Our findings thus indicate that the effects of lDPLFC-tDCS on the AB are less substantial than observed in our initial study. Although this should be quite a common scenario, null findings can be difficult to interpret and are still under-represented in the brain stimulation and cognitive neuroscience literatures. An important auxiliary goal of this paper is therefore to provide a tutorial for other researchers, to maximize the evidential value from null findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87941612022-01-28 Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt Reteig, Leon C. Newman, Lionel A. Ridderinkhof, K. Richard Slagter, Heleen A. PLoS One Research Article The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon reveals a bottleneck of human information processing: the second of two targets is often missed when they are presented in rapid succession among distractors. In our previous work, we showed that the size of the AB can be changed by applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) (London & Slagter, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 756–68, 2021). Although AB size at the group level remained unchanged, the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS were negatively correlated: if a given individual’s AB size decreased from baseline during anodal tDCS, their AB size would increase during cathodal tDCS, and vice versa. Here, we attempted to replicate this finding. We found no group effects of tDCS, as in the original study, but we no longer found a significant negative correlation. We present a series of statistical measures of replication success, all of which confirm that both studies are not in agreement. First, the correlation here is significantly smaller than a conservative estimate of the original correlation. Second, the difference between the correlations is greater than expected due to sampling error, and our data are more consistent with a zero-effect than with the original estimate. Finally, the overall effect when combining both studies is small and not significant. Our findings thus indicate that the effects of lDPLFC-tDCS on the AB are less substantial than observed in our initial study. Although this should be quite a common scenario, null findings can be difficult to interpret and are still under-represented in the brain stimulation and cognitive neuroscience literatures. An important auxiliary goal of this paper is therefore to provide a tutorial for other researchers, to maximize the evidential value from null findings. Public Library of Science 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8794161/ /pubmed/35085301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262718 Text en © 2022 Reteig et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reteig, Leon C.
Newman, Lionel A.
Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
Slagter, Heleen A.
Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
title Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
title_full Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
title_fullStr Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
title_full_unstemmed Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
title_short Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
title_sort effects of tdcs on the attentional blink revisited: a statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262718
work_keys_str_mv AT reteigleonc effectsoftdcsontheattentionalblinkrevisitedastatisticalevaluationofareplicationattempt
AT newmanlionela effectsoftdcsontheattentionalblinkrevisitedastatisticalevaluationofareplicationattempt
AT ridderinkhofkrichard effectsoftdcsontheattentionalblinkrevisitedastatisticalevaluationofareplicationattempt
AT slagterheleena effectsoftdcsontheattentionalblinkrevisitedastatisticalevaluationofareplicationattempt