Cargando…

fNIRS brain measures of ongoing nociception during surgical incisions under anesthesia

SIGNIFICANCE: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has evaluated pain in awake and anesthetized states. AIM: We evaluated fNIRS signals under general anesthesia in patients undergoing knee surgery for anterior cruciate ligament repair. APPROACH: Patients were split into groups: those with r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Stephen, Karunakaran, Keerthana Deepti, Labadie, Robert, Kussman, Barry, Mizrahi-Arnaud, Arielle, Morad, Andrea Gomez, Berry, Delany, Zurakowski, David, Micheli, Lyle, Peng, Ke, Borsook, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.1.015002
Descripción
Sumario:SIGNIFICANCE: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has evaluated pain in awake and anesthetized states. AIM: We evaluated fNIRS signals under general anesthesia in patients undergoing knee surgery for anterior cruciate ligament repair. APPROACH: Patients were split into groups: those with regional nerve block (NB) and those without (non-NB). Continuous fNIRS measures came from three regions: the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), known to be involved in evaluation of nociception, the lateral prefrontal cortex (BA9), and the polar frontal cortex (BA10), both involved in higher cortical functions (such as cognition and emotion). RESULTS: Our results show three significant differences in fNIRS signals to incision procedures between groups: (1) NB compared with non-NB was associated with a greater net positive hemodynamic response to pain procedures in S1; (2) dynamic correlation between the prefrontal cortex (PreFC) and S1 within 1 min of painful procedures are anticorrelated in NB while positively correlated in non-NB; and (3) hemodynamic measures of activation were similar at two separate time points during surgery (i.e., first and last incisions) in PreFC and S1 but showed significant differences in their overlap. Comparing pain levels immediately after surgery and during discharge from postoperative care revealed no significant differences in the pain levels between NB and non-NB. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest multiple pain events that occur during surgery using devised algorithms could potentially give a measure of “pain load.” This may allow for evaluation of central sensitization (i.e., a heightened state of the nervous system where noxious and non-noxious stimuli is perceived as painful) to postoperative pain levels and the resulting analgesic consumption. This evaluation could potentially predict postsurgical chronic neuropathic pain.