Cargando…

Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery has been shown as a safe and feasible surgical procedure to treat a broad range of thoracic malignancies with a shorten hospital stay, a quicker return to normal daily activities and superior quality of life compared to open approach. Nonetheless, its ut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricciardi, Sara, Davini, Federico, Romano, Gaetano, Zirafa, Carmelina Cristina, Melfi, Franca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118298
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-20-47
_version_ 1784640823287087104
author Ricciardi, Sara
Davini, Federico
Romano, Gaetano
Zirafa, Carmelina Cristina
Melfi, Franca
author_facet Ricciardi, Sara
Davini, Federico
Romano, Gaetano
Zirafa, Carmelina Cristina
Melfi, Franca
author_sort Ricciardi, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery has been shown as a safe and feasible surgical procedure to treat a broad range of thoracic malignancies with a shorten hospital stay, a quicker return to normal daily activities and superior quality of life compared to open approach. Nonetheless, its utilization has predominantly been restricted to the average surgical intervention. In the latest years, given the technological improvements and the advanced skills of the “robotic” surgeons, this approach has been applied to more complex and challenging procedures (e.g., advanced stages/ after neoadjuvant therapies). The aim of this study is to show the results and the advantages of redo thoracic procedures performed with a robot-assisted approach. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (2017–2019). We analysed the first case series undergoing robotic approach (totally endoscopic) in patients who underwent previous surgery and/or radiotherapy for thoracic malignancies. RESULTS: Nine patients (M/F =5/4) with a median age of 73 years underwent robotic procedures after previous radical surgery (n=6) or radiation therapy treatment (n=3). The mean time interval between the two interventions was 96.12 months (range, 7–444 months). The conversion rate was 0%. No postoperative death occurred. Only one complication arose (air leaking) treated conservatively. The median length of stay and chest tube duration were 5 days (range, 4–10 days) and 2 days (range, 2–5 days). The 30-, 60- and 90-day mortality was 0%. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2–12 months), all patients are currently alive, disease free, and with an overall survival and a disease-free survival of 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic surgery is a safe and feasible approach in case of redo-robotic surgery, showing good outcomes, permitting a fast return to full daily activity, and enabling the patients to rapidly undergo adjuvant treatments, when required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87944242022-02-02 Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre Ricciardi, Sara Davini, Federico Romano, Gaetano Zirafa, Carmelina Cristina Melfi, Franca Mediastinum Original Article BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery has been shown as a safe and feasible surgical procedure to treat a broad range of thoracic malignancies with a shorten hospital stay, a quicker return to normal daily activities and superior quality of life compared to open approach. Nonetheless, its utilization has predominantly been restricted to the average surgical intervention. In the latest years, given the technological improvements and the advanced skills of the “robotic” surgeons, this approach has been applied to more complex and challenging procedures (e.g., advanced stages/ after neoadjuvant therapies). The aim of this study is to show the results and the advantages of redo thoracic procedures performed with a robot-assisted approach. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (2017–2019). We analysed the first case series undergoing robotic approach (totally endoscopic) in patients who underwent previous surgery and/or radiotherapy for thoracic malignancies. RESULTS: Nine patients (M/F =5/4) with a median age of 73 years underwent robotic procedures after previous radical surgery (n=6) or radiation therapy treatment (n=3). The mean time interval between the two interventions was 96.12 months (range, 7–444 months). The conversion rate was 0%. No postoperative death occurred. Only one complication arose (air leaking) treated conservatively. The median length of stay and chest tube duration were 5 days (range, 4–10 days) and 2 days (range, 2–5 days). The 30-, 60- and 90-day mortality was 0%. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2–12 months), all patients are currently alive, disease free, and with an overall survival and a disease-free survival of 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic surgery is a safe and feasible approach in case of redo-robotic surgery, showing good outcomes, permitting a fast return to full daily activity, and enabling the patients to rapidly undergo adjuvant treatments, when required. AME Publishing Company 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8794424/ /pubmed/35118298 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-20-47 Text en 2020 Mediastinum. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ricciardi, Sara
Davini, Federico
Romano, Gaetano
Zirafa, Carmelina Cristina
Melfi, Franca
Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre
title Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre
title_full Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre
title_fullStr Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre
title_full_unstemmed Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre
title_short Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre
title_sort thoracic redo-robotic surgery (trrs): a case series of a single centre
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118298
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-20-47
work_keys_str_mv AT ricciardisara thoracicredoroboticsurgerytrrsacaseseriesofasinglecentre
AT davinifederico thoracicredoroboticsurgerytrrsacaseseriesofasinglecentre
AT romanogaetano thoracicredoroboticsurgerytrrsacaseseriesofasinglecentre
AT zirafacarmelinacristina thoracicredoroboticsurgerytrrsacaseseriesofasinglecentre
AT melfifranca thoracicredoroboticsurgerytrrsacaseseriesofasinglecentre