Cargando…

Sex differences in learning from exploration

Sex-based modulation of cognitive processes could set the stage for individual differences in vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders. While value-based decision making processes in particular have been proposed to be influenced by sex differences, the overall correct performance in decision mak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Cathy S, Knep, Evan, Han, Autumn, Ebitz, R Becket, Grissom, Nicola M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796870
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69748
_version_ 1784640832978026496
author Chen, Cathy S
Knep, Evan
Han, Autumn
Ebitz, R Becket
Grissom, Nicola M
author_facet Chen, Cathy S
Knep, Evan
Han, Autumn
Ebitz, R Becket
Grissom, Nicola M
author_sort Chen, Cathy S
collection PubMed
description Sex-based modulation of cognitive processes could set the stage for individual differences in vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders. While value-based decision making processes in particular have been proposed to be influenced by sex differences, the overall correct performance in decision making tasks often show variable or minimal differences across sexes. Computational tools allow us to uncover latent variables that define different decision making approaches, even in animals with similar correct performance. Here, we quantify sex differences in mice in the latent variables underlying behavior in a classic value-based decision making task: a restless two-armed bandit. While male and female mice had similar accuracy, they achieved this performance via different patterns of exploration. Male mice tended to make more exploratory choices overall, largely because they appeared to get ‘stuck’ in exploration once they had started. Female mice tended to explore less but learned more quickly during exploration. Together, these results suggest that sex exerts stronger influences on decision making during periods of learning and exploration than during stable choices. Exploration during decision making is altered in people diagnosed with addictions, depression, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, pinpointing the neural mechanisms of exploration as a highly translational avenue for conferring sex-modulated vulnerability to neuropsychiatric diagnoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87944692022-01-31 Sex differences in learning from exploration Chen, Cathy S Knep, Evan Han, Autumn Ebitz, R Becket Grissom, Nicola M eLife Computational and Systems Biology Sex-based modulation of cognitive processes could set the stage for individual differences in vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders. While value-based decision making processes in particular have been proposed to be influenced by sex differences, the overall correct performance in decision making tasks often show variable or minimal differences across sexes. Computational tools allow us to uncover latent variables that define different decision making approaches, even in animals with similar correct performance. Here, we quantify sex differences in mice in the latent variables underlying behavior in a classic value-based decision making task: a restless two-armed bandit. While male and female mice had similar accuracy, they achieved this performance via different patterns of exploration. Male mice tended to make more exploratory choices overall, largely because they appeared to get ‘stuck’ in exploration once they had started. Female mice tended to explore less but learned more quickly during exploration. Together, these results suggest that sex exerts stronger influences on decision making during periods of learning and exploration than during stable choices. Exploration during decision making is altered in people diagnosed with addictions, depression, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, pinpointing the neural mechanisms of exploration as a highly translational avenue for conferring sex-modulated vulnerability to neuropsychiatric diagnoses. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8794469/ /pubmed/34796870 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69748 Text en © 2021, Chen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Computational and Systems Biology
Chen, Cathy S
Knep, Evan
Han, Autumn
Ebitz, R Becket
Grissom, Nicola M
Sex differences in learning from exploration
title Sex differences in learning from exploration
title_full Sex differences in learning from exploration
title_fullStr Sex differences in learning from exploration
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in learning from exploration
title_short Sex differences in learning from exploration
title_sort sex differences in learning from exploration
topic Computational and Systems Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796870
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69748
work_keys_str_mv AT chencathys sexdifferencesinlearningfromexploration
AT knepevan sexdifferencesinlearningfromexploration
AT hanautumn sexdifferencesinlearningfromexploration
AT ebitzrbecket sexdifferencesinlearningfromexploration
AT grissomnicolam sexdifferencesinlearningfromexploration