Cargando…
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals
BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is considered first-line therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections based on observational data from small studies. Levofloxacin has emerged as a popular alternative due to tolerability concerns related to TMP-SMX. Data comparing levofloxa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab644 |
_version_ | 1784640847000633344 |
---|---|
author | Sarzynski, Sadia H Warner, Sarah Sun, Junfeng Matsouaka, Roland Dekker, John P Babiker, Ahmed Li, Willy Lai, Yi Ling Danner, Robert L Fowler, Vance G Kadri, Sameer S |
author_facet | Sarzynski, Sadia H Warner, Sarah Sun, Junfeng Matsouaka, Roland Dekker, John P Babiker, Ahmed Li, Willy Lai, Yi Ling Danner, Robert L Fowler, Vance G Kadri, Sameer S |
author_sort | Sarzynski, Sadia H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is considered first-line therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections based on observational data from small studies. Levofloxacin has emerged as a popular alternative due to tolerability concerns related to TMP-SMX. Data comparing levofloxacin to TMP-SMX as targeted therapy are lacking. METHODS: Adult inpatient encounters January 2005 through December 2017 with growth of S maltophilia in blood and/or lower respiratory cultures were identified in the Cerner Healthfacts database. Patients included received targeted therapy with either levofloxacin or TMP-SMX. Overlap weighting was used followed by downstream weighted regression. The primary outcome was adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice. The secondary outcome was number of days from index S maltophilia culture to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 1581 patients with S maltophilia infections, levofloxacin (n = 823) displayed statistically similar mortality risk (aOR, 0.76 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .58–1.01]; P = .06) compared to TMP-SMX (n = 758). Levofloxacin (vs TMP-SMX) use was associated with a lower aOR of death in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (n = 1452) (aOR, 0.73 [95% CI, .54–.98]; P = .03) and if initiated empirically (n = 89) (aOR, 0.16 [95% CI, .03–.95]; P = .04). The levofloxacin cohort had fewer hospital days between index culture collection and discharge (weighted median [interquartile range], 7 [4–13] vs 9 [6–16] days; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on observational evidence, levofloxacin is a reasonable alternative to TMP-SMX for the treatment of bloodstream and lower respiratory tract infections caused by S maltophilia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8794591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87945912022-01-28 Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals Sarzynski, Sadia H Warner, Sarah Sun, Junfeng Matsouaka, Roland Dekker, John P Babiker, Ahmed Li, Willy Lai, Yi Ling Danner, Robert L Fowler, Vance G Kadri, Sameer S Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is considered first-line therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections based on observational data from small studies. Levofloxacin has emerged as a popular alternative due to tolerability concerns related to TMP-SMX. Data comparing levofloxacin to TMP-SMX as targeted therapy are lacking. METHODS: Adult inpatient encounters January 2005 through December 2017 with growth of S maltophilia in blood and/or lower respiratory cultures were identified in the Cerner Healthfacts database. Patients included received targeted therapy with either levofloxacin or TMP-SMX. Overlap weighting was used followed by downstream weighted regression. The primary outcome was adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice. The secondary outcome was number of days from index S maltophilia culture to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 1581 patients with S maltophilia infections, levofloxacin (n = 823) displayed statistically similar mortality risk (aOR, 0.76 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .58–1.01]; P = .06) compared to TMP-SMX (n = 758). Levofloxacin (vs TMP-SMX) use was associated with a lower aOR of death in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (n = 1452) (aOR, 0.73 [95% CI, .54–.98]; P = .03) and if initiated empirically (n = 89) (aOR, 0.16 [95% CI, .03–.95]; P = .04). The levofloxacin cohort had fewer hospital days between index culture collection and discharge (weighted median [interquartile range], 7 [4–13] vs 9 [6–16] days; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on observational evidence, levofloxacin is a reasonable alternative to TMP-SMX for the treatment of bloodstream and lower respiratory tract infections caused by S maltophilia. Oxford University Press 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8794591/ /pubmed/35097154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab644 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Sarzynski, Sadia H Warner, Sarah Sun, Junfeng Matsouaka, Roland Dekker, John P Babiker, Ahmed Li, Willy Lai, Yi Ling Danner, Robert L Fowler, Vance G Kadri, Sameer S Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals |
title | Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals |
title_full | Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals |
title_fullStr | Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals |
title_short | Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals |
title_sort | trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus levofloxacin for stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a retrospective comparative effectiveness study of electronic health records from 154 us hospitals |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarzynskisadiah trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT warnersarah trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT sunjunfeng trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT matsouakaroland trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT dekkerjohnp trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT babikerahmed trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT liwilly trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT laiyiling trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT dannerrobertl trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT fowlervanceg trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals AT kadrisameers trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleversuslevofloxacinforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsaretrospectivecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofelectronichealthrecordsfrom154ushospitals |