Cargando…

A niche for null models in adaptive resource management

As global systems rapidly change, our collective ability to predict future ecological dynamics will become increasingly important for successful natural resource management. By merging stakeholder objectives with system uncertainty, and by adapting actions to changing systems and knowledge, adaptive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koons, David N., Riecke, Thomas V., Boomer, G. Scott, Sedinger, Benjamin S., Sedinger, James S., Williams, Perry J., Arnold, Todd W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8541
_version_ 1784640893299458048
author Koons, David N.
Riecke, Thomas V.
Boomer, G. Scott
Sedinger, Benjamin S.
Sedinger, James S.
Williams, Perry J.
Arnold, Todd W.
author_facet Koons, David N.
Riecke, Thomas V.
Boomer, G. Scott
Sedinger, Benjamin S.
Sedinger, James S.
Williams, Perry J.
Arnold, Todd W.
author_sort Koons, David N.
collection PubMed
description As global systems rapidly change, our collective ability to predict future ecological dynamics will become increasingly important for successful natural resource management. By merging stakeholder objectives with system uncertainty, and by adapting actions to changing systems and knowledge, adaptive resource management (ARM) provides a rigorous platform for making sound decisions in a changing world. Critically, however, applications of ARM could be improved by employing benchmarks (i.e., points of reference) for determining when learning is occurring through the cycle of monitoring, modeling, and decision‐making steps in ARM. Many applications of ARM use multiple model‐based hypotheses to identify and reduce systematic uncertainty over time, but generally lack benchmarks for gauging discovery of scientific evidence and learning. This creates the danger of thinking that directional changes in model weights or rankings are indicative of evidence for hypotheses, when possibly all competing models are inadequate. There is thus a somewhat obvious, but yet to be filled niche for including benchmarks for learning in ARM. We contend that carefully designed “ecological null models,” which are structured to produce an expected ecological pattern in the absence of a hypothesized mechanism, can serve as suitable benchmarks. Using a classic case study of mallard harvest management that is often used to demonstrate the successes of ARM for learning about ecological mechanisms, we show that simple ecological null models, such as population persistence (N(t) (+1) = N(t) ), provide more robust near‐term forecasts of population abundance than the currently used mechanistic models. More broadly, ecological null models can be used as benchmarks for learning in ARM that trigger the need for discarding model parameterizations and developing new ones when prevailing models underperform the ecological null model. Identifying mechanistic models that surpass these benchmarks will improve learning through ARM and help decision‐makers keep pace with a rapidly changing world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87947632022-02-04 A niche for null models in adaptive resource management Koons, David N. Riecke, Thomas V. Boomer, G. Scott Sedinger, Benjamin S. Sedinger, James S. Williams, Perry J. Arnold, Todd W. Ecol Evol Working Hypothesis As global systems rapidly change, our collective ability to predict future ecological dynamics will become increasingly important for successful natural resource management. By merging stakeholder objectives with system uncertainty, and by adapting actions to changing systems and knowledge, adaptive resource management (ARM) provides a rigorous platform for making sound decisions in a changing world. Critically, however, applications of ARM could be improved by employing benchmarks (i.e., points of reference) for determining when learning is occurring through the cycle of monitoring, modeling, and decision‐making steps in ARM. Many applications of ARM use multiple model‐based hypotheses to identify and reduce systematic uncertainty over time, but generally lack benchmarks for gauging discovery of scientific evidence and learning. This creates the danger of thinking that directional changes in model weights or rankings are indicative of evidence for hypotheses, when possibly all competing models are inadequate. There is thus a somewhat obvious, but yet to be filled niche for including benchmarks for learning in ARM. We contend that carefully designed “ecological null models,” which are structured to produce an expected ecological pattern in the absence of a hypothesized mechanism, can serve as suitable benchmarks. Using a classic case study of mallard harvest management that is often used to demonstrate the successes of ARM for learning about ecological mechanisms, we show that simple ecological null models, such as population persistence (N(t) (+1) = N(t) ), provide more robust near‐term forecasts of population abundance than the currently used mechanistic models. More broadly, ecological null models can be used as benchmarks for learning in ARM that trigger the need for discarding model parameterizations and developing new ones when prevailing models underperform the ecological null model. Identifying mechanistic models that surpass these benchmarks will improve learning through ARM and help decision‐makers keep pace with a rapidly changing world. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8794763/ /pubmed/35127044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8541 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Working Hypothesis
Koons, David N.
Riecke, Thomas V.
Boomer, G. Scott
Sedinger, Benjamin S.
Sedinger, James S.
Williams, Perry J.
Arnold, Todd W.
A niche for null models in adaptive resource management
title A niche for null models in adaptive resource management
title_full A niche for null models in adaptive resource management
title_fullStr A niche for null models in adaptive resource management
title_full_unstemmed A niche for null models in adaptive resource management
title_short A niche for null models in adaptive resource management
title_sort niche for null models in adaptive resource management
topic Working Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8541
work_keys_str_mv AT koonsdavidn anichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT rieckethomasv anichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT boomergscott anichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT sedingerbenjamins anichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT sedingerjamess anichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT williamsperryj anichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT arnoldtoddw anichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT koonsdavidn nichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT rieckethomasv nichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT boomergscott nichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT sedingerbenjamins nichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT sedingerjamess nichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT williamsperryj nichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement
AT arnoldtoddw nichefornullmodelsinadaptiveresourcemanagement