Cargando…

Fast response times signal social connection in conversation

Clicking is one of the most robust metaphors for social connection. But how do we know when two people "click"? We asked pairs of friends and strangers to talk with each other and rate their felt connection. For both friends and strangers, speed in response was a robust predictor of feelin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Templeton, Emma M., Chang, Luke J., Reynolds, Elizabeth A., Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D., Wheatley, Thalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116915119
_version_ 1784640911416754176
author Templeton, Emma M.
Chang, Luke J.
Reynolds, Elizabeth A.
Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D.
Wheatley, Thalia
author_facet Templeton, Emma M.
Chang, Luke J.
Reynolds, Elizabeth A.
Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D.
Wheatley, Thalia
author_sort Templeton, Emma M.
collection PubMed
description Clicking is one of the most robust metaphors for social connection. But how do we know when two people "click"? We asked pairs of friends and strangers to talk with each other and rate their felt connection. For both friends and strangers, speed in response was a robust predictor of feeling connected. Conversations with faster response times felt more connected than conversations with slower response times, and within conversations, connected moments had faster response times than less-connected moments. This effect was determined primarily by partner responsivity: People felt more connected to the degree that their partner responded quickly to them rather than by how quickly they responded to their partner. The temporal scale of these effects (<250 ms) precludes conscious control, thus providing an honest signal of connection. Using a round-robin design in each of six closed networks, we show that faster responders evoked greater feelings of connection across partners. Finally, we demonstrate that this signal is used by third-party listeners as a heuristic of how well people are connected: Conversations with faster response times were perceived as more connected than the same conversations with slower response times. Together, these findings suggest that response times comprise a robust and sufficient signal of whether two minds “click.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87948352022-02-03 Fast response times signal social connection in conversation Templeton, Emma M. Chang, Luke J. Reynolds, Elizabeth A. Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D. Wheatley, Thalia Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Clicking is one of the most robust metaphors for social connection. But how do we know when two people "click"? We asked pairs of friends and strangers to talk with each other and rate their felt connection. For both friends and strangers, speed in response was a robust predictor of feeling connected. Conversations with faster response times felt more connected than conversations with slower response times, and within conversations, connected moments had faster response times than less-connected moments. This effect was determined primarily by partner responsivity: People felt more connected to the degree that their partner responded quickly to them rather than by how quickly they responded to their partner. The temporal scale of these effects (<250 ms) precludes conscious control, thus providing an honest signal of connection. Using a round-robin design in each of six closed networks, we show that faster responders evoked greater feelings of connection across partners. Finally, we demonstrate that this signal is used by third-party listeners as a heuristic of how well people are connected: Conversations with faster response times were perceived as more connected than the same conversations with slower response times. Together, these findings suggest that response times comprise a robust and sufficient signal of whether two minds “click.” National Academy of Sciences 2022-01-18 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8794835/ /pubmed/35042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116915119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Templeton, Emma M.
Chang, Luke J.
Reynolds, Elizabeth A.
Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D.
Wheatley, Thalia
Fast response times signal social connection in conversation
title Fast response times signal social connection in conversation
title_full Fast response times signal social connection in conversation
title_fullStr Fast response times signal social connection in conversation
title_full_unstemmed Fast response times signal social connection in conversation
title_short Fast response times signal social connection in conversation
title_sort fast response times signal social connection in conversation
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116915119
work_keys_str_mv AT templetonemmam fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation
AT changlukej fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation
AT reynoldselizabetha fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation
AT conelebeaumontmaried fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation
AT wheatleythalia fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation