Cargando…
Fast response times signal social connection in conversation
Clicking is one of the most robust metaphors for social connection. But how do we know when two people "click"? We asked pairs of friends and strangers to talk with each other and rate their felt connection. For both friends and strangers, speed in response was a robust predictor of feelin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116915119 |
_version_ | 1784640911416754176 |
---|---|
author | Templeton, Emma M. Chang, Luke J. Reynolds, Elizabeth A. Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D. Wheatley, Thalia |
author_facet | Templeton, Emma M. Chang, Luke J. Reynolds, Elizabeth A. Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D. Wheatley, Thalia |
author_sort | Templeton, Emma M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clicking is one of the most robust metaphors for social connection. But how do we know when two people "click"? We asked pairs of friends and strangers to talk with each other and rate their felt connection. For both friends and strangers, speed in response was a robust predictor of feeling connected. Conversations with faster response times felt more connected than conversations with slower response times, and within conversations, connected moments had faster response times than less-connected moments. This effect was determined primarily by partner responsivity: People felt more connected to the degree that their partner responded quickly to them rather than by how quickly they responded to their partner. The temporal scale of these effects (<250 ms) precludes conscious control, thus providing an honest signal of connection. Using a round-robin design in each of six closed networks, we show that faster responders evoked greater feelings of connection across partners. Finally, we demonstrate that this signal is used by third-party listeners as a heuristic of how well people are connected: Conversations with faster response times were perceived as more connected than the same conversations with slower response times. Together, these findings suggest that response times comprise a robust and sufficient signal of whether two minds “click.” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8794835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87948352022-02-03 Fast response times signal social connection in conversation Templeton, Emma M. Chang, Luke J. Reynolds, Elizabeth A. Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D. Wheatley, Thalia Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Clicking is one of the most robust metaphors for social connection. But how do we know when two people "click"? We asked pairs of friends and strangers to talk with each other and rate their felt connection. For both friends and strangers, speed in response was a robust predictor of feeling connected. Conversations with faster response times felt more connected than conversations with slower response times, and within conversations, connected moments had faster response times than less-connected moments. This effect was determined primarily by partner responsivity: People felt more connected to the degree that their partner responded quickly to them rather than by how quickly they responded to their partner. The temporal scale of these effects (<250 ms) precludes conscious control, thus providing an honest signal of connection. Using a round-robin design in each of six closed networks, we show that faster responders evoked greater feelings of connection across partners. Finally, we demonstrate that this signal is used by third-party listeners as a heuristic of how well people are connected: Conversations with faster response times were perceived as more connected than the same conversations with slower response times. Together, these findings suggest that response times comprise a robust and sufficient signal of whether two minds “click.” National Academy of Sciences 2022-01-18 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8794835/ /pubmed/35042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116915119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Social Sciences Templeton, Emma M. Chang, Luke J. Reynolds, Elizabeth A. Cone LeBeaumont, Marie D. Wheatley, Thalia Fast response times signal social connection in conversation |
title | Fast response times signal social connection in conversation |
title_full | Fast response times signal social connection in conversation |
title_fullStr | Fast response times signal social connection in conversation |
title_full_unstemmed | Fast response times signal social connection in conversation |
title_short | Fast response times signal social connection in conversation |
title_sort | fast response times signal social connection in conversation |
topic | Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116915119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT templetonemmam fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation AT changlukej fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation AT reynoldselizabetha fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation AT conelebeaumontmaried fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation AT wheatleythalia fastresponsetimessignalsocialconnectioninconversation |