Cargando…

Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration

We can use information derived from passing time to anticipate an upcoming event. If time before an event varies, responses towards this event become faster with increasing waiting time. This variable-foreperiod effect has been often observed in response-speed studies. Different action control frame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmalbrock, Philip, Frings, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7
_version_ 1784640927191531520
author Schmalbrock, Philip
Frings, Christian
author_facet Schmalbrock, Philip
Frings, Christian
author_sort Schmalbrock, Philip
collection PubMed
description We can use information derived from passing time to anticipate an upcoming event. If time before an event varies, responses towards this event become faster with increasing waiting time. This variable-foreperiod effect has been often observed in response-speed studies. Different action control frameworks assume that response and stimulus features are integrated into an event file that is retrieved later if features repeat. Yet the role of foreperiods has so far not been investigated in action control. Thus, we investigated the influence of foreperiod on the integration of action-perception features. Participants worked through a standard distractor–response binding paradigm where two consecutive responses are made towards target letters while distractor letters are present. Responses and/or distractors can repeat or change from first to second display, leading to partial repetition costs when only some features repeat or repetition benefits when all features repeat (the difference constituting distractor–response binding). To investigate the effect of foreperiod, we also introduced an anti-geometric distribution of foreperiods to the time interval before the first response display. We observed that distractor–response binding increased with increasing foreperiod duration, and speculate that this was driven by an increase in motor readiness induced by temporal expectancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8794897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87948972022-02-02 Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration Schmalbrock, Philip Frings, Christian Atten Percept Psychophys Article We can use information derived from passing time to anticipate an upcoming event. If time before an event varies, responses towards this event become faster with increasing waiting time. This variable-foreperiod effect has been often observed in response-speed studies. Different action control frameworks assume that response and stimulus features are integrated into an event file that is retrieved later if features repeat. Yet the role of foreperiods has so far not been investigated in action control. Thus, we investigated the influence of foreperiod on the integration of action-perception features. Participants worked through a standard distractor–response binding paradigm where two consecutive responses are made towards target letters while distractor letters are present. Responses and/or distractors can repeat or change from first to second display, leading to partial repetition costs when only some features repeat or repetition benefits when all features repeat (the difference constituting distractor–response binding). To investigate the effect of foreperiod, we also introduced an anti-geometric distribution of foreperiods to the time interval before the first response display. We observed that distractor–response binding increased with increasing foreperiod duration, and speculate that this was driven by an increase in motor readiness induced by temporal expectancy. Springer US 2021-08-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8794897/ /pubmed/34449072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schmalbrock, Philip
Frings, Christian
Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration
title Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration
title_full Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration
title_fullStr Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration
title_full_unstemmed Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration
title_short Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration
title_sort temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7
work_keys_str_mv AT schmalbrockphilip temporalexpectancymodulatesstimulusresponseintegration
AT fringschristian temporalexpectancymodulatesstimulusresponseintegration