Cargando…

Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of OAGB/MGB (one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass) have been well documented both as primary and as revisional procedures. However, even after OAGB/MGB, revisional surgery is unavoidable in patients with surgical complications or insufficient weight loss. METHODS: A qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musella, Mario, Vitiello, Antonio, Susa, Antonio, Greco, Francesco, De Luca, Maurizio, Manno, Emilio, Olmi, Stefano, Raffaelli, Marco, Lucchese, Marcello, Carandina, Sergio, Foletto, Mirto, Pizza, Francesco, Bardi, Ugo, Navarra, Giuseppe, Schettino, Angelo Michele, Gentileschi, Paolo, Sarro, Giuliano, Chiappetta, Sonja, Tirone, Andrea, Berardi, Giovanna, Velotti, Nunzio, Foschi, Diego, Zappa, Marco, Piazza, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34973123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05779-y
_version_ 1784640954765934592
author Musella, Mario
Vitiello, Antonio
Susa, Antonio
Greco, Francesco
De Luca, Maurizio
Manno, Emilio
Olmi, Stefano
Raffaelli, Marco
Lucchese, Marcello
Carandina, Sergio
Foletto, Mirto
Pizza, Francesco
Bardi, Ugo
Navarra, Giuseppe
Schettino, Angelo Michele
Gentileschi, Paolo
Sarro, Giuliano
Chiappetta, Sonja
Tirone, Andrea
Berardi, Giovanna
Velotti, Nunzio
Foschi, Diego
Zappa, Marco
Piazza, Luigi
author_facet Musella, Mario
Vitiello, Antonio
Susa, Antonio
Greco, Francesco
De Luca, Maurizio
Manno, Emilio
Olmi, Stefano
Raffaelli, Marco
Lucchese, Marcello
Carandina, Sergio
Foletto, Mirto
Pizza, Francesco
Bardi, Ugo
Navarra, Giuseppe
Schettino, Angelo Michele
Gentileschi, Paolo
Sarro, Giuliano
Chiappetta, Sonja
Tirone, Andrea
Berardi, Giovanna
Velotti, Nunzio
Foschi, Diego
Zappa, Marco
Piazza, Luigi
author_sort Musella, Mario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of OAGB/MGB (one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass) have been well documented both as primary and as revisional procedures. However, even after OAGB/MGB, revisional surgery is unavoidable in patients with surgical complications or insufficient weight loss. METHODS: A questionnaire asking for the total number and demographics of primary and revisional OAGB/MGBs performed between January 2006 and July 2020 was e-mailed to all S.I.C. OB centres of excellence (annual caseload > 100; 5-year follow-up > 50%). Each bariatric centre was asked to provide gender, age, preoperative body mass index (BMI) and obesity-related comorbidities, previous history of abdominal or bariatric surgery, indication for surgical revision of OAGB/MGB, type of revisional procedure, pre- and post-revisional BMI, peri- and post-operative complications, last follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Twenty-three bariatric centres (54.8%) responded to our survey reporting a total number of 8676 primary OAGB/MGBS and a follow-up of 62.42 ± 52.22 months. A total of 181 (2.08%) patients underwent revisional surgery: 82 (0.94%) were suffering from intractable DGER (duodeno-gastric-esophageal reflux), 42 (0.48%) were reoperated for weight regain, 16 (0.18%) had excessive weight loss and malnutrition, 12 (0.13%) had a marginal ulcer perforation, 10 (0.11%) had a gastro-gastric fistula, 20 (0.23%) had other causes of revision. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was the most performed revisional procedure (109; 54%), followed by bilio-pancreatic limb elongation (19; 9.4%) and normal anatomy restoration (19; 9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that there is acceptable revisional rate after OAGB/MGB and conversion to RYGB represents the most frequent choice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05779-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8795019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87950192022-02-02 Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey Musella, Mario Vitiello, Antonio Susa, Antonio Greco, Francesco De Luca, Maurizio Manno, Emilio Olmi, Stefano Raffaelli, Marco Lucchese, Marcello Carandina, Sergio Foletto, Mirto Pizza, Francesco Bardi, Ugo Navarra, Giuseppe Schettino, Angelo Michele Gentileschi, Paolo Sarro, Giuliano Chiappetta, Sonja Tirone, Andrea Berardi, Giovanna Velotti, Nunzio Foschi, Diego Zappa, Marco Piazza, Luigi Obes Surg Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of OAGB/MGB (one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass) have been well documented both as primary and as revisional procedures. However, even after OAGB/MGB, revisional surgery is unavoidable in patients with surgical complications or insufficient weight loss. METHODS: A questionnaire asking for the total number and demographics of primary and revisional OAGB/MGBs performed between January 2006 and July 2020 was e-mailed to all S.I.C. OB centres of excellence (annual caseload > 100; 5-year follow-up > 50%). Each bariatric centre was asked to provide gender, age, preoperative body mass index (BMI) and obesity-related comorbidities, previous history of abdominal or bariatric surgery, indication for surgical revision of OAGB/MGB, type of revisional procedure, pre- and post-revisional BMI, peri- and post-operative complications, last follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Twenty-three bariatric centres (54.8%) responded to our survey reporting a total number of 8676 primary OAGB/MGBS and a follow-up of 62.42 ± 52.22 months. A total of 181 (2.08%) patients underwent revisional surgery: 82 (0.94%) were suffering from intractable DGER (duodeno-gastric-esophageal reflux), 42 (0.48%) were reoperated for weight regain, 16 (0.18%) had excessive weight loss and malnutrition, 12 (0.13%) had a marginal ulcer perforation, 10 (0.11%) had a gastro-gastric fistula, 20 (0.23%) had other causes of revision. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was the most performed revisional procedure (109; 54%), followed by bilio-pancreatic limb elongation (19; 9.4%) and normal anatomy restoration (19; 9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that there is acceptable revisional rate after OAGB/MGB and conversion to RYGB represents the most frequent choice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05779-y. Springer US 2022-01-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8795019/ /pubmed/34973123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05779-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Musella, Mario
Vitiello, Antonio
Susa, Antonio
Greco, Francesco
De Luca, Maurizio
Manno, Emilio
Olmi, Stefano
Raffaelli, Marco
Lucchese, Marcello
Carandina, Sergio
Foletto, Mirto
Pizza, Francesco
Bardi, Ugo
Navarra, Giuseppe
Schettino, Angelo Michele
Gentileschi, Paolo
Sarro, Giuliano
Chiappetta, Sonja
Tirone, Andrea
Berardi, Giovanna
Velotti, Nunzio
Foschi, Diego
Zappa, Marco
Piazza, Luigi
Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey
title Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey
title_full Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey
title_fullStr Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey
title_full_unstemmed Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey
title_short Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey
title_sort revisional surgery after one anastomosis/minigastric bypass: an italian multi-institutional survey
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34973123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05779-y
work_keys_str_mv AT musellamario revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT vitielloantonio revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT susaantonio revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT grecofrancesco revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT delucamaurizio revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT mannoemilio revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT olmistefano revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT raffaellimarco revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT lucchesemarcello revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT carandinasergio revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT folettomirto revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT pizzafrancesco revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT bardiugo revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT navarragiuseppe revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT schettinoangelomichele revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT gentileschipaolo revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT sarrogiuliano revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT chiappettasonja revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT tironeandrea revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT berardigiovanna revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT velottinunzio revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT foschidiego revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT zappamarco revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT piazzaluigi revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT revisionalsurgeryafteroneanastomosisminigastricbypassanitalianmultiinstitutionalsurvey