Cargando…

Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study

BACKGROUND: Although low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) has shown promise in the treatment of poststroke aphasia, the efficacy of high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) has yet to be determined. PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Ting-Yu, Wang, Jia-Chi, Lin, Mu-Yun, Tsai, Po-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.800377
_version_ 1784640969555050496
author Chou, Ting-Yu
Wang, Jia-Chi
Lin, Mu-Yun
Tsai, Po-Yi
author_facet Chou, Ting-Yu
Wang, Jia-Chi
Lin, Mu-Yun
Tsai, Po-Yi
author_sort Chou, Ting-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) has shown promise in the treatment of poststroke aphasia, the efficacy of high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) has yet to be determined. PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in ameliorating chronic non-fluent aphasia and compared it with that of LF-rTMS. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with poststroke non-fluent aphasia to an ipsilesional iTBS (n = 29), contralesional 1-Hz rTMS (n = 27), or sham (n = 29) group. Each group received the rTMS protocol executed in 10 daily sessions over 2 weeks. We evaluated language function before and after the intervention by using the Concise Chinese Aphasia Test (CCAT). RESULTS: Compared with the sham group, the iTBS group exhibited significant improvements in conversation, description, and expression scores (P = 0.0004–0.031), which characterize verbal production, as well as in auditory comprehension, reading comprehension, and matching scores (P < 0.01), which characterize language perception. The 1-Hz group exhibited superior improvements in expression, reading comprehension, and imitation writing scores compared with the sham group (P < 0.05). The iTBS group had significantly superior results in CCAT total score, matching and auditory comprehension (P < 0.05) relative to the 1-Hz group. CONCLUSION: Our study findings contribute to a growing body of evidence that ipsilesional iTBS enhances the language recovery of patients with non-fluent aphasia after a chronic stroke. Auditory comprehension was more preferentially enhanced by iTBS compared with the 1-Hz protocol. Our findings highlight the importance of ipsilesional modulation through excitatory rTMS for the recovery of non-fluent aphasia in patients with chronic stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03059225].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8795082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87950822022-01-29 Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study Chou, Ting-Yu Wang, Jia-Chi Lin, Mu-Yun Tsai, Po-Yi Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Although low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) has shown promise in the treatment of poststroke aphasia, the efficacy of high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) has yet to be determined. PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in ameliorating chronic non-fluent aphasia and compared it with that of LF-rTMS. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with poststroke non-fluent aphasia to an ipsilesional iTBS (n = 29), contralesional 1-Hz rTMS (n = 27), or sham (n = 29) group. Each group received the rTMS protocol executed in 10 daily sessions over 2 weeks. We evaluated language function before and after the intervention by using the Concise Chinese Aphasia Test (CCAT). RESULTS: Compared with the sham group, the iTBS group exhibited significant improvements in conversation, description, and expression scores (P = 0.0004–0.031), which characterize verbal production, as well as in auditory comprehension, reading comprehension, and matching scores (P < 0.01), which characterize language perception. The 1-Hz group exhibited superior improvements in expression, reading comprehension, and imitation writing scores compared with the sham group (P < 0.05). The iTBS group had significantly superior results in CCAT total score, matching and auditory comprehension (P < 0.05) relative to the 1-Hz group. CONCLUSION: Our study findings contribute to a growing body of evidence that ipsilesional iTBS enhances the language recovery of patients with non-fluent aphasia after a chronic stroke. Auditory comprehension was more preferentially enhanced by iTBS compared with the 1-Hz protocol. Our findings highlight the importance of ipsilesional modulation through excitatory rTMS for the recovery of non-fluent aphasia in patients with chronic stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03059225]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8795082/ /pubmed/35095477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.800377 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chou, Wang, Lin and Tsai. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Chou, Ting-Yu
Wang, Jia-Chi
Lin, Mu-Yun
Tsai, Po-Yi
Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
title Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
title_full Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
title_fullStr Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
title_full_unstemmed Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
title_short Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
title_sort low-frequency vs. theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of chronic non-fluent aphasia in stroke: a proof-of-concept study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.800377
work_keys_str_mv AT choutingyu lowfrequencyvsthetabursttranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofchronicnonfluentaphasiainstrokeaproofofconceptstudy
AT wangjiachi lowfrequencyvsthetabursttranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofchronicnonfluentaphasiainstrokeaproofofconceptstudy
AT linmuyun lowfrequencyvsthetabursttranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofchronicnonfluentaphasiainstrokeaproofofconceptstudy
AT tsaipoyi lowfrequencyvsthetabursttranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofchronicnonfluentaphasiainstrokeaproofofconceptstudy