Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement

CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis was that IONA would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition, and that using IONA would accelerate recovery to sports-specific acti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colasanti, Christopher, Mercer, Nathaniel P., Garcia, Jeremie, Stornebrink, Tobias, Kerkhoffs, Gino, Dahmen, Jari, Kennedy, John G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795091/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00149
_version_ 1784640971797954560
author Colasanti, Christopher
Mercer, Nathaniel P.
Garcia, Jeremie
Stornebrink, Tobias
Kerkhoffs, Gino
Dahmen, Jari
Kennedy, John G.
author_facet Colasanti, Christopher
Mercer, Nathaniel P.
Garcia, Jeremie
Stornebrink, Tobias
Kerkhoffs, Gino
Dahmen, Jari
Kennedy, John G.
author_sort Colasanti, Christopher
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis was that IONA would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition, and that using IONA would accelerate recovery to sports-specific activities compared to the literature using standard arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study investigating patients who underwent IONA for anterior ankle impingement between 2019 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the following methods preoperatively and at final follow-up: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. A five-point Likert scale regarding patient satisfaction was evaluated at final follow-up. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in this study, which included eighteen males and thirteen females with a mean age of 41.7 +- 15.5 years (range, 17-69 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.3 +- 5.7 kg/m(2) (range, 19.37-41.5). The mean follow-up time was 12. +- 1.9 months (range, 11-15 months). There were 27 patients who participated in sports activity prior to IONA-arthroscopy procedure. Of those, 26 patients (96%) returned to their sports activities. The median time to return to sports was 3.9 weeks (range, 1.5 to 12 weeks). Patients reported an overall positive experience with a mean rating scale of 9.71 +- .8 (range, 6 to 10). Twenty-seven patients (87%) reported the highest rating (10/10) for overall positive experience and felt that seeing their procedure in real-time aided in their understanding of their underlying pathology. Lastly, twenty-nine patients (94 %) expressed willingness to undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that IONA treatment of anterior ankle impingement results in significant pain reduction, a low complication rate, and excellent patient-reported outcomes with high rates of return to work/sport. Additionally, IONA for anterior ankle impingement leads to high patient satisfaction with a significant willingness to undergo the same procedure again.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8795091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87950912022-01-28 Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement Colasanti, Christopher Mercer, Nathaniel P. Garcia, Jeremie Stornebrink, Tobias Kerkhoffs, Gino Dahmen, Jari Kennedy, John G. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Arthroscopy INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The hypothesis was that IONA would provide the patient with a unique experience of their pathology and facilitate their rapid recovery through an awareness of their own condition, and that using IONA would accelerate recovery to sports-specific activities compared to the literature using standard arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study investigating patients who underwent IONA for anterior ankle impingement between 2019 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the following methods preoperatively and at final follow-up: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. A five-point Likert scale regarding patient satisfaction was evaluated at final follow-up. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in this study, which included eighteen males and thirteen females with a mean age of 41.7 +- 15.5 years (range, 17-69 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.3 +- 5.7 kg/m(2) (range, 19.37-41.5). The mean follow-up time was 12. +- 1.9 months (range, 11-15 months). There were 27 patients who participated in sports activity prior to IONA-arthroscopy procedure. Of those, 26 patients (96%) returned to their sports activities. The median time to return to sports was 3.9 weeks (range, 1.5 to 12 weeks). Patients reported an overall positive experience with a mean rating scale of 9.71 +- .8 (range, 6 to 10). Twenty-seven patients (87%) reported the highest rating (10/10) for overall positive experience and felt that seeing their procedure in real-time aided in their understanding of their underlying pathology. Lastly, twenty-nine patients (94 %) expressed willingness to undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that IONA treatment of anterior ankle impingement results in significant pain reduction, a low complication rate, and excellent patient-reported outcomes with high rates of return to work/sport. Additionally, IONA for anterior ankle impingement leads to high patient satisfaction with a significant willingness to undergo the same procedure again. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8795091/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00149 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Colasanti, Christopher
Mercer, Nathaniel P.
Garcia, Jeremie
Stornebrink, Tobias
Kerkhoffs, Gino
Dahmen, Jari
Kennedy, John G.
Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement
title Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Nano Arthroscopy in the Office Setting for the Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement
title_sort clinical outcomes of nano arthroscopy in the office setting for the treatment of anterior ankle impingement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795091/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00149
work_keys_str_mv AT colasantichristopher clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofanteriorankleimpingement
AT mercernathanielp clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofanteriorankleimpingement
AT garciajeremie clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofanteriorankleimpingement
AT stornebrinktobias clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofanteriorankleimpingement
AT kerkhoffsgino clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofanteriorankleimpingement
AT dahmenjari clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofanteriorankleimpingement
AT kennedyjohng clinicaloutcomesofnanoarthroscopyintheofficesettingforthetreatmentofanteriorankleimpingement