Cargando…

Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It?

CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot; Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Flexor digitorum longus (FDL) transfer, in conjunction with osseous procedures, is used routinely for the treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD). It is well established however that the relative power of the F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dooley, Sean W., Evashwick-Rogler, Thomas, Murawski, Christopher D., Guyton, Gregory P., Smyth, Niall A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795092/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00180
_version_ 1784640972041224192
author Dooley, Sean W.
Evashwick-Rogler, Thomas
Murawski, Christopher D.
Guyton, Gregory P.
Smyth, Niall A.
author_facet Dooley, Sean W.
Evashwick-Rogler, Thomas
Murawski, Christopher D.
Guyton, Gregory P.
Smyth, Niall A.
author_sort Dooley, Sean W.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot; Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Flexor digitorum longus (FDL) transfer, in conjunction with osseous procedures, is used routinely for the treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD). It is well established however that the relative power of the FDL tendon is significantly inferior than that of the native posterior tibial tendon. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the evidence that supports or refutes the use of an FDL transfer in the surgical treatment of PTTD. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis. Using the terms 'flexor digitorum longus OR FDL AND posterior tibial tendon dysfunction OR PTTD OR adult acquired flatfoot OR AAFD' we searched the PubMed/Medline database. Both clinical and biomechanical studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, including 31 clinical studies and 10 biomechanical in vitro studies. All 31 clinical studies consisted of Level IV evidence, and support the use of an FDL transfer. There was significant heterogeneity of the clinical evidence due to the variety of concomitant procedures. Of the 10 biomechanical in vitro studies, 2 support the use of an FDL transfer, although these did not assess the procedure in isolation. 8 biomechanical in vitro studies specifically assessing the effect on of an FDL transfer contradict its use for PTTD. CONCLUSION: There is poor quality clinical evidence to support the use of an FDL transfer for PTTD and the biomechanical literature refutes the use of the procedure. It remains unknown if the clinical improvement reported in the literature can be attributed to the FDL transfer or the concomitant osseous procedures. Additional studies are needed to assess the validity of the FDL transfer and whether alternatives are available to preserve the PTT muscle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8795092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87950922022-01-28 Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It? Dooley, Sean W. Evashwick-Rogler, Thomas Murawski, Christopher D. Guyton, Gregory P. Smyth, Niall A. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot; Other INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Flexor digitorum longus (FDL) transfer, in conjunction with osseous procedures, is used routinely for the treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD). It is well established however that the relative power of the FDL tendon is significantly inferior than that of the native posterior tibial tendon. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the evidence that supports or refutes the use of an FDL transfer in the surgical treatment of PTTD. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis. Using the terms 'flexor digitorum longus OR FDL AND posterior tibial tendon dysfunction OR PTTD OR adult acquired flatfoot OR AAFD' we searched the PubMed/Medline database. Both clinical and biomechanical studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, including 31 clinical studies and 10 biomechanical in vitro studies. All 31 clinical studies consisted of Level IV evidence, and support the use of an FDL transfer. There was significant heterogeneity of the clinical evidence due to the variety of concomitant procedures. Of the 10 biomechanical in vitro studies, 2 support the use of an FDL transfer, although these did not assess the procedure in isolation. 8 biomechanical in vitro studies specifically assessing the effect on of an FDL transfer contradict its use for PTTD. CONCLUSION: There is poor quality clinical evidence to support the use of an FDL transfer for PTTD and the biomechanical literature refutes the use of the procedure. It remains unknown if the clinical improvement reported in the literature can be attributed to the FDL transfer or the concomitant osseous procedures. Additional studies are needed to assess the validity of the FDL transfer and whether alternatives are available to preserve the PTT muscle. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8795092/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00180 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Dooley, Sean W.
Evashwick-Rogler, Thomas
Murawski, Christopher D.
Guyton, Gregory P.
Smyth, Niall A.
Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It?
title Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It?
title_full Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It?
title_fullStr Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It?
title_full_unstemmed Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It?
title_short Flexor Digitorum Longus Transfer for Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction is the Standard of Care: Does the Evidence Support It?
title_sort flexor digitorum longus transfer for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction is the standard of care: does the evidence support it?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795092/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00180
work_keys_str_mv AT dooleyseanw flexordigitorumlongustransferforposteriortibialtendondysfunctionisthestandardofcaredoestheevidencesupportit
AT evashwickroglerthomas flexordigitorumlongustransferforposteriortibialtendondysfunctionisthestandardofcaredoestheevidencesupportit
AT murawskichristopherd flexordigitorumlongustransferforposteriortibialtendondysfunctionisthestandardofcaredoestheevidencesupportit
AT guytongregoryp flexordigitorumlongustransferforposteriortibialtendondysfunctionisthestandardofcaredoestheevidencesupportit
AT smythnialla flexordigitorumlongustransferforposteriortibialtendondysfunctionisthestandardofcaredoestheevidencesupportit