Cargando…

The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis

CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Diabetes INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Diabetic foot infections show increasing prevalence. Their therapy is time consuming and expensive. Standardized antibiotic treatments do not exist. Suboptimal antibiotic therapy increases the morbidity of the patient. The aim of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Waldecker, Ute
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795163/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00491
_version_ 1784640990429052928
author Waldecker, Ute
author_facet Waldecker, Ute
author_sort Waldecker, Ute
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Diabetes INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Diabetic foot infections show increasing prevalence. Their therapy is time consuming and expensive. Standardized antibiotic treatments do not exist. Suboptimal antibiotic therapy increases the morbidity of the patient. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dominating bacterial colonization in the diabetic foot. Furthermore we evaluated the changes of the colonization during surgical and antibiotic treatment and the efficiency of the therapy. METHODS: The study included 100 patients with a diabetic foot syndrome and a pedal ulcer. Ulcers were classified according to Wagner Classification. HbA1c, CRP and patients BMI were documented. All patients underwent an angiologic investigation with arterial doppler ultrasonography and TcpO2 measurement. An MRI of the affected foot was performed to rule out osteomyelitis. All patients underwent surgical and antibiotic treatment. Surgery included debridement, abscess drainage, VAK therapy, bony resection, minor amputation, resection arthroplasty, Helal osteotomies. Osteomyelitis was pathologically verified. Microbiological results of superficial and deep smears, which were taken during the surgical therapy were analyzed. The antibiotic treatment was adapted to the bacterial resistance. RESULTS: The duration of antibiotic treatment varied from 1 to 136 days (Mean:19.6 days, SD:17.3 ). The mean number of surgical interventions was 2.6. The dominating initial antibiotic treatment was Clindamycin/ Cefuroxim (48%) followed by Clindamycin (11%),Cefuroxim (7%), Clindamycin/ Ciprofloxacin (6%), Tazobactam (3%). The dominating bacteria were gram +. The difference of the percentage distribution compared to the gram- bacteria was statistically significant. The only significant percentage change of the antibiotic treatment was seen after the first surgical intervention, when the initial antibiotic treatment was significantly more effective against gram - bacteria. A change of the antibiotic treatment was seen with 1. Clindamycin / Ciprofloxacin in 66%, 2. Tazobactam in 67%, 3.Clindamycin in 36% and Clindamycin/ Cefuroxim in 35%. CONCLUSION: The dominating bacteria of the infected diabetic feet were gram +. The initial i.v. antibiotic treatment with Clindamycin/ Cefuroxim was effective in 66%. An optimization of the initial antibiotic treatment with greater focus on the gram + bacteria seems to be necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8795163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87951632022-01-28 The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis Waldecker, Ute Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics; Diabetes INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Diabetic foot infections show increasing prevalence. Their therapy is time consuming and expensive. Standardized antibiotic treatments do not exist. Suboptimal antibiotic therapy increases the morbidity of the patient. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dominating bacterial colonization in the diabetic foot. Furthermore we evaluated the changes of the colonization during surgical and antibiotic treatment and the efficiency of the therapy. METHODS: The study included 100 patients with a diabetic foot syndrome and a pedal ulcer. Ulcers were classified according to Wagner Classification. HbA1c, CRP and patients BMI were documented. All patients underwent an angiologic investigation with arterial doppler ultrasonography and TcpO2 measurement. An MRI of the affected foot was performed to rule out osteomyelitis. All patients underwent surgical and antibiotic treatment. Surgery included debridement, abscess drainage, VAK therapy, bony resection, minor amputation, resection arthroplasty, Helal osteotomies. Osteomyelitis was pathologically verified. Microbiological results of superficial and deep smears, which were taken during the surgical therapy were analyzed. The antibiotic treatment was adapted to the bacterial resistance. RESULTS: The duration of antibiotic treatment varied from 1 to 136 days (Mean:19.6 days, SD:17.3 ). The mean number of surgical interventions was 2.6. The dominating initial antibiotic treatment was Clindamycin/ Cefuroxim (48%) followed by Clindamycin (11%),Cefuroxim (7%), Clindamycin/ Ciprofloxacin (6%), Tazobactam (3%). The dominating bacteria were gram +. The difference of the percentage distribution compared to the gram- bacteria was statistically significant. The only significant percentage change of the antibiotic treatment was seen after the first surgical intervention, when the initial antibiotic treatment was significantly more effective against gram - bacteria. A change of the antibiotic treatment was seen with 1. Clindamycin / Ciprofloxacin in 66%, 2. Tazobactam in 67%, 3.Clindamycin in 36% and Clindamycin/ Cefuroxim in 35%. CONCLUSION: The dominating bacteria of the infected diabetic feet were gram +. The initial i.v. antibiotic treatment with Clindamycin/ Cefuroxim was effective in 66%. An optimization of the initial antibiotic treatment with greater focus on the gram + bacteria seems to be necessary. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8795163/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00491 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Waldecker, Ute
The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis
title The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis
title_full The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis
title_fullStr The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis
title_short The Infected Diabetic Foot: A Microbiological Analysis
title_sort infected diabetic foot: a microbiological analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795163/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00491
work_keys_str_mv AT waldeckerute theinfecteddiabeticfootamicrobiologicalanalysis
AT waldeckerute infecteddiabeticfootamicrobiologicalanalysis