Cargando…
STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience
PURPOSE: To outline the process of the STABILISE technique and its use; reporting patient outcomes and midterm follow up for complicated aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre retrospective analysis from January 2011 to January 2021 using the STABILISE technique which utilises ballo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00286-2 |
_version_ | 1784641021081026560 |
---|---|
author | Mitreski, Goran Flanders, Damian Maingard, Julian Robinson, Domenic Chuen, Jason Matalanis, George Seevanayagam, Siven Kok, Hong Kuan Ranatunga, Dinesh Asadi, Hamed Brooks, Duncan Mark |
author_facet | Mitreski, Goran Flanders, Damian Maingard, Julian Robinson, Domenic Chuen, Jason Matalanis, George Seevanayagam, Siven Kok, Hong Kuan Ranatunga, Dinesh Asadi, Hamed Brooks, Duncan Mark |
author_sort | Mitreski, Goran |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To outline the process of the STABILISE technique and its use; reporting patient outcomes and midterm follow up for complicated aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre retrospective analysis from January 2011 to January 2021 using the STABILISE technique which utilises balloon assistance to facilitate intimal disruption and promote aortic relamination. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent endovascular aortic repair with the STABILISE technique for aortic dissection over the study period. Fourteen patients (14/16; 88%) had acute dissection. Two of 16 (12%) were chronic. The median age of the patient cohort was 61 years (range 32–80 years) and consisted of a male majority (n = 11; 69%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention was 5 days (1–115 days; IQR 1–17.3). More than half (56%) had surgical repair of a acute type A aortic dissection prior to radiological intervention. The procedure was technically successful with no procedural mortality. Two patients were lost to follow up and two died in the post-operative period. Twelve patients had ongoing follow up with an average number of 2.9 ± 1.6 scans performed. Follow up was available in thirteen patients (81%) with a median follow up period of 1097 days (IQR 707–1657). The rate of re-intervention (n = 2/16; 13%) requiring additional stenting was in line with published re-intervention data (15%). Follow up showed a reduction in false lumen size following treatment with total luminal dimensions remaining stable over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The STABILISE technique as a procedure for complicated aortic dissection, either acute or chronic, appears safe with stable mid-term aortic remodelling and patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective cohort study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8795251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87952512022-02-02 STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience Mitreski, Goran Flanders, Damian Maingard, Julian Robinson, Domenic Chuen, Jason Matalanis, George Seevanayagam, Siven Kok, Hong Kuan Ranatunga, Dinesh Asadi, Hamed Brooks, Duncan Mark CVIR Endovasc Original Article PURPOSE: To outline the process of the STABILISE technique and its use; reporting patient outcomes and midterm follow up for complicated aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre retrospective analysis from January 2011 to January 2021 using the STABILISE technique which utilises balloon assistance to facilitate intimal disruption and promote aortic relamination. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent endovascular aortic repair with the STABILISE technique for aortic dissection over the study period. Fourteen patients (14/16; 88%) had acute dissection. Two of 16 (12%) were chronic. The median age of the patient cohort was 61 years (range 32–80 years) and consisted of a male majority (n = 11; 69%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention was 5 days (1–115 days; IQR 1–17.3). More than half (56%) had surgical repair of a acute type A aortic dissection prior to radiological intervention. The procedure was technically successful with no procedural mortality. Two patients were lost to follow up and two died in the post-operative period. Twelve patients had ongoing follow up with an average number of 2.9 ± 1.6 scans performed. Follow up was available in thirteen patients (81%) with a median follow up period of 1097 days (IQR 707–1657). The rate of re-intervention (n = 2/16; 13%) requiring additional stenting was in line with published re-intervention data (15%). Follow up showed a reduction in false lumen size following treatment with total luminal dimensions remaining stable over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The STABILISE technique as a procedure for complicated aortic dissection, either acute or chronic, appears safe with stable mid-term aortic remodelling and patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective cohort study. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8795251/ /pubmed/35084561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00286-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mitreski, Goran Flanders, Damian Maingard, Julian Robinson, Domenic Chuen, Jason Matalanis, George Seevanayagam, Siven Kok, Hong Kuan Ranatunga, Dinesh Asadi, Hamed Brooks, Duncan Mark STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience |
title | STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience |
title_full | STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience |
title_fullStr | STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience |
title_full_unstemmed | STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience |
title_short | STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience |
title_sort | stabilise; treatment of aortic dissection, a single centre experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00286-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitreskigoran stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT flandersdamian stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT maingardjulian stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT robinsondomenic stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT chuenjason stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT matalanisgeorge stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT seevanayagamsiven stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT kokhongkuan stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT ranatungadinesh stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT asadihamed stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience AT brooksduncanmark stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience |