Cargando…

STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience

PURPOSE: To outline the process of the STABILISE technique and its use; reporting patient outcomes and midterm follow up for complicated aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre retrospective analysis from January 2011 to January 2021 using the STABILISE technique which utilises ballo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitreski, Goran, Flanders, Damian, Maingard, Julian, Robinson, Domenic, Chuen, Jason, Matalanis, George, Seevanayagam, Siven, Kok, Hong Kuan, Ranatunga, Dinesh, Asadi, Hamed, Brooks, Duncan Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00286-2
_version_ 1784641021081026560
author Mitreski, Goran
Flanders, Damian
Maingard, Julian
Robinson, Domenic
Chuen, Jason
Matalanis, George
Seevanayagam, Siven
Kok, Hong Kuan
Ranatunga, Dinesh
Asadi, Hamed
Brooks, Duncan Mark
author_facet Mitreski, Goran
Flanders, Damian
Maingard, Julian
Robinson, Domenic
Chuen, Jason
Matalanis, George
Seevanayagam, Siven
Kok, Hong Kuan
Ranatunga, Dinesh
Asadi, Hamed
Brooks, Duncan Mark
author_sort Mitreski, Goran
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To outline the process of the STABILISE technique and its use; reporting patient outcomes and midterm follow up for complicated aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre retrospective analysis from January 2011 to January 2021 using the STABILISE technique which utilises balloon assistance to facilitate intimal disruption and promote aortic relamination. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent endovascular aortic repair with the STABILISE technique for aortic dissection over the study period. Fourteen patients (14/16; 88%) had acute dissection. Two of 16 (12%) were chronic. The median age of the patient cohort was 61 years (range 32–80 years) and consisted of a male majority (n = 11; 69%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention was 5 days (1–115 days; IQR 1–17.3). More than half (56%) had surgical repair of a acute type A aortic dissection prior to radiological intervention. The procedure was technically successful with no procedural mortality. Two patients were lost to follow up and two died in the post-operative period. Twelve patients had ongoing follow up with an average number of 2.9 ± 1.6 scans performed. Follow up was available in thirteen patients (81%) with a median follow up period of 1097 days (IQR 707–1657). The rate of re-intervention (n = 2/16; 13%) requiring additional stenting was in line with published re-intervention data (15%). Follow up showed a reduction in false lumen size following treatment with total luminal dimensions remaining stable over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The STABILISE technique as a procedure for complicated aortic dissection, either acute or chronic, appears safe with stable mid-term aortic remodelling and patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective cohort study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8795251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87952512022-02-02 STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience Mitreski, Goran Flanders, Damian Maingard, Julian Robinson, Domenic Chuen, Jason Matalanis, George Seevanayagam, Siven Kok, Hong Kuan Ranatunga, Dinesh Asadi, Hamed Brooks, Duncan Mark CVIR Endovasc Original Article PURPOSE: To outline the process of the STABILISE technique and its use; reporting patient outcomes and midterm follow up for complicated aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre retrospective analysis from January 2011 to January 2021 using the STABILISE technique which utilises balloon assistance to facilitate intimal disruption and promote aortic relamination. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent endovascular aortic repair with the STABILISE technique for aortic dissection over the study period. Fourteen patients (14/16; 88%) had acute dissection. Two of 16 (12%) were chronic. The median age of the patient cohort was 61 years (range 32–80 years) and consisted of a male majority (n = 11; 69%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention was 5 days (1–115 days; IQR 1–17.3). More than half (56%) had surgical repair of a acute type A aortic dissection prior to radiological intervention. The procedure was technically successful with no procedural mortality. Two patients were lost to follow up and two died in the post-operative period. Twelve patients had ongoing follow up with an average number of 2.9 ± 1.6 scans performed. Follow up was available in thirteen patients (81%) with a median follow up period of 1097 days (IQR 707–1657). The rate of re-intervention (n = 2/16; 13%) requiring additional stenting was in line with published re-intervention data (15%). Follow up showed a reduction in false lumen size following treatment with total luminal dimensions remaining stable over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The STABILISE technique as a procedure for complicated aortic dissection, either acute or chronic, appears safe with stable mid-term aortic remodelling and patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective cohort study. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8795251/ /pubmed/35084561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00286-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Mitreski, Goran
Flanders, Damian
Maingard, Julian
Robinson, Domenic
Chuen, Jason
Matalanis, George
Seevanayagam, Siven
Kok, Hong Kuan
Ranatunga, Dinesh
Asadi, Hamed
Brooks, Duncan Mark
STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience
title STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience
title_full STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience
title_fullStr STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience
title_full_unstemmed STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience
title_short STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience
title_sort stabilise; treatment of aortic dissection, a single centre experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00286-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mitreskigoran stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT flandersdamian stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT maingardjulian stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT robinsondomenic stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT chuenjason stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT matalanisgeorge stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT seevanayagamsiven stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT kokhongkuan stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT ranatungadinesh stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT asadihamed stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience
AT brooksduncanmark stabilisetreatmentofaorticdissectionasinglecentreexperience