Cargando…

Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of mixed reality combined with surgical navigation in oral and maxillofacial tumor surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data of seven patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors who underwent surgery between January 2019 and January 2021 usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Zu-Nan, Hu, Lei-Hao, Soh, Hui Yuh, Yu, Yao, Zhang, Wen-Bo, Peng, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715484
_version_ 1784641146456113152
author Tang, Zu-Nan
Hu, Lei-Hao
Soh, Hui Yuh
Yu, Yao
Zhang, Wen-Bo
Peng, Xin
author_facet Tang, Zu-Nan
Hu, Lei-Hao
Soh, Hui Yuh
Yu, Yao
Zhang, Wen-Bo
Peng, Xin
author_sort Tang, Zu-Nan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of mixed reality combined with surgical navigation in oral and maxillofacial tumor surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data of seven patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors who underwent surgery between January 2019 and January 2021 using a combination of mixed reality and surgical navigation. Virtual surgical planning and navigation plan were based on preoperative CT datasets. Through IGT-Link port, mixed reality workstation was synchronized with surgical navigation, and surgical planning data were transferred to the mixed reality workstation. Osteotomy lines were marked with the aid of both surgical navigation and mixed reality images visualized through HoloLens. Frozen section examination was used to ensure negative surgical margins. Postoperative CT datasets were obtained 1 week after the surgery, and chromatographic analysis of virtual osteotomies and actual osteotomies was carried out. Patients received standard oncological postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Of the seven patients, four had maxillary tumors and three had mandibular tumors. There were total of 13 osteotomy planes. Mean deviation between the planned osteotomy plane and the actual osteotomy plane was 1.68 ± 0.92 mm; the maximum deviation was 3.46 mm. Chromatographic analysis showed error of ≤3 mm for 80.16% of the points. Mean deviations of maxillary and mandibular osteotomy lines were approximate (1.60 ± 0.93 mm vs. 1.86 ± 0.93 mm). While five patients had benign tumors, two had malignant tumors. Mean deviations of osteotomy lines was comparable between patients with benign and malignant tumors (1.48 ± 0.74 mm vs. 2.18 ± 0.77 mm). Intraoperative frozen pathology confirmed negative resection margins in all cases. No tumor recurrence or complications occurred during mean follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 6-26 months). CONCLUSION: The combination of mixed reality technology and surgical navigation appears to be feasible, safe, and effective for tumor resection in the oral and maxillofacial region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8795771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87957712022-01-29 Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection Tang, Zu-Nan Hu, Lei-Hao Soh, Hui Yuh Yu, Yao Zhang, Wen-Bo Peng, Xin Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of mixed reality combined with surgical navigation in oral and maxillofacial tumor surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data of seven patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors who underwent surgery between January 2019 and January 2021 using a combination of mixed reality and surgical navigation. Virtual surgical planning and navigation plan were based on preoperative CT datasets. Through IGT-Link port, mixed reality workstation was synchronized with surgical navigation, and surgical planning data were transferred to the mixed reality workstation. Osteotomy lines were marked with the aid of both surgical navigation and mixed reality images visualized through HoloLens. Frozen section examination was used to ensure negative surgical margins. Postoperative CT datasets were obtained 1 week after the surgery, and chromatographic analysis of virtual osteotomies and actual osteotomies was carried out. Patients received standard oncological postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Of the seven patients, four had maxillary tumors and three had mandibular tumors. There were total of 13 osteotomy planes. Mean deviation between the planned osteotomy plane and the actual osteotomy plane was 1.68 ± 0.92 mm; the maximum deviation was 3.46 mm. Chromatographic analysis showed error of ≤3 mm for 80.16% of the points. Mean deviations of maxillary and mandibular osteotomy lines were approximate (1.60 ± 0.93 mm vs. 1.86 ± 0.93 mm). While five patients had benign tumors, two had malignant tumors. Mean deviations of osteotomy lines was comparable between patients with benign and malignant tumors (1.48 ± 0.74 mm vs. 2.18 ± 0.77 mm). Intraoperative frozen pathology confirmed negative resection margins in all cases. No tumor recurrence or complications occurred during mean follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 6-26 months). CONCLUSION: The combination of mixed reality technology and surgical navigation appears to be feasible, safe, and effective for tumor resection in the oral and maxillofacial region. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8795771/ /pubmed/35096559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715484 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tang, Hu, Soh, Yu, Zhang and Peng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Tang, Zu-Nan
Hu, Lei-Hao
Soh, Hui Yuh
Yu, Yao
Zhang, Wen-Bo
Peng, Xin
Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection
title Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection
title_full Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection
title_fullStr Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection
title_short Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection
title_sort accuracy of mixed reality combined with surgical navigation assisted oral and maxillofacial tumor resection
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715484
work_keys_str_mv AT tangzunan accuracyofmixedrealitycombinedwithsurgicalnavigationassistedoralandmaxillofacialtumorresection
AT huleihao accuracyofmixedrealitycombinedwithsurgicalnavigationassistedoralandmaxillofacialtumorresection
AT sohhuiyuh accuracyofmixedrealitycombinedwithsurgicalnavigationassistedoralandmaxillofacialtumorresection
AT yuyao accuracyofmixedrealitycombinedwithsurgicalnavigationassistedoralandmaxillofacialtumorresection
AT zhangwenbo accuracyofmixedrealitycombinedwithsurgicalnavigationassistedoralandmaxillofacialtumorresection
AT pengxin accuracyofmixedrealitycombinedwithsurgicalnavigationassistedoralandmaxillofacialtumorresection