Cargando…
Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes
In recent years, bioelectrochemical systems have advanced towards upscaling applications and tested during field trials, primarily for wastewater treatment. Amongst reported trials, two designs of urine-fed microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were tested successfully on a pilot scale as autonomous sanitatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Sequoia
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230875 |
_version_ | 1784641158790512640 |
---|---|
author | Walter, Xavier Alexis Madrid, Elena Gajda, Iwona Greenman, John Ieropoulos, Ioannis |
author_facet | Walter, Xavier Alexis Madrid, Elena Gajda, Iwona Greenman, John Ieropoulos, Ioannis |
author_sort | Walter, Xavier Alexis |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, bioelectrochemical systems have advanced towards upscaling applications and tested during field trials, primarily for wastewater treatment. Amongst reported trials, two designs of urine-fed microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were tested successfully on a pilot scale as autonomous sanitation systems for decentralised area. These designs, known as ceramic MFCs (c-MFCs) and self-stratifying MFCs (s-MFC), have never been calibrated under similar conditions. Here, the most advanced versions of both designs were assembled and tested under similar feeding conditions. The performance and efficiency were evaluated under different hydraulic retention times (HRT), through chemical oxygen demand measures and polarisation experiments. Results show that c-MFCs displayed constant performance independently from the HRT (32.2 ± 3.9 W m(−3)) whilst displaying high energy conversion efficiency at longer HRT (NER(COD) = 2.092 ± 0.119 KWh.Kg(COD)(−1), at 24h HRT). The s-MFC showed a correlation between performance and HRT. The highest performance was reached under short HRT (69.7 ± 0.4 W m(−3) at 3h HRT), but the energy conversion efficiency was constant independently from the HRT (0.338 ± 0.029 KWh.Kg(COD)(−1)). The c-MFCs and s-MFCs similarly showed the highest volumetric efficiency under long HRT (65h) with NER(V) of 0.747 ± 0.010 KWh.m(−3) and 0.825 ± 0.086 KWh.m(−3), respectively. Overall, c-MFCs seems more appropriate for longer HRT and s-MFCs for shorter HRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8795817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Sequoia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87958172022-02-02 Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes Walter, Xavier Alexis Madrid, Elena Gajda, Iwona Greenman, John Ieropoulos, Ioannis J Power Sources Article In recent years, bioelectrochemical systems have advanced towards upscaling applications and tested during field trials, primarily for wastewater treatment. Amongst reported trials, two designs of urine-fed microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were tested successfully on a pilot scale as autonomous sanitation systems for decentralised area. These designs, known as ceramic MFCs (c-MFCs) and self-stratifying MFCs (s-MFC), have never been calibrated under similar conditions. Here, the most advanced versions of both designs were assembled and tested under similar feeding conditions. The performance and efficiency were evaluated under different hydraulic retention times (HRT), through chemical oxygen demand measures and polarisation experiments. Results show that c-MFCs displayed constant performance independently from the HRT (32.2 ± 3.9 W m(−3)) whilst displaying high energy conversion efficiency at longer HRT (NER(COD) = 2.092 ± 0.119 KWh.Kg(COD)(−1), at 24h HRT). The s-MFC showed a correlation between performance and HRT. The highest performance was reached under short HRT (69.7 ± 0.4 W m(−3) at 3h HRT), but the energy conversion efficiency was constant independently from the HRT (0.338 ± 0.029 KWh.Kg(COD)(−1)). The c-MFCs and s-MFCs similarly showed the highest volumetric efficiency under long HRT (65h) with NER(V) of 0.747 ± 0.010 KWh.m(−3) and 0.825 ± 0.086 KWh.m(−3), respectively. Overall, c-MFCs seems more appropriate for longer HRT and s-MFCs for shorter HRT. Elsevier Sequoia 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8795817/ /pubmed/35125632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230875 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Walter, Xavier Alexis Madrid, Elena Gajda, Iwona Greenman, John Ieropoulos, Ioannis Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes |
title | Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes |
title_full | Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes |
title_fullStr | Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes |
title_short | Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes |
title_sort | microbial fuel cell scale-up options: performance evaluation of membrane (c-mfc) and membrane-less (s-mfc) systems under different feeding regimes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walterxavieralexis microbialfuelcellscaleupoptionsperformanceevaluationofmembranecmfcandmembranelesssmfcsystemsunderdifferentfeedingregimes AT madridelena microbialfuelcellscaleupoptionsperformanceevaluationofmembranecmfcandmembranelesssmfcsystemsunderdifferentfeedingregimes AT gajdaiwona microbialfuelcellscaleupoptionsperformanceevaluationofmembranecmfcandmembranelesssmfcsystemsunderdifferentfeedingregimes AT greenmanjohn microbialfuelcellscaleupoptionsperformanceevaluationofmembranecmfcandmembranelesssmfcsystemsunderdifferentfeedingregimes AT ieropoulosioannis microbialfuelcellscaleupoptionsperformanceevaluationofmembranecmfcandmembranelesssmfcsystemsunderdifferentfeedingregimes |