Cargando…

Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of sev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blayney, Douglas W., Mohanlal, Ramon, Adamchuk, Hryhoriy, Kirtbaya, Dmitry Valikovich, Chen, Michael, Du, Lihua, Ogenstad, Stephan, Ginn, Greg, Huang, Lan, Zhang, Qingyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45446
_version_ 1784641209444073472
author Blayney, Douglas W.
Mohanlal, Ramon
Adamchuk, Hryhoriy
Kirtbaya, Dmitry Valikovich
Chen, Michael
Du, Lihua
Ogenstad, Stephan
Ginn, Greg
Huang, Lan
Zhang, Qingyuan
author_facet Blayney, Douglas W.
Mohanlal, Ramon
Adamchuk, Hryhoriy
Kirtbaya, Dmitry Valikovich
Chen, Michael
Du, Lihua
Ogenstad, Stephan
Ginn, Greg
Huang, Lan
Zhang, Qingyuan
author_sort Blayney, Douglas W.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 in patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors (PROTECTIVE-1) double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in multiple centers in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the US. Participants included patients with breast, prostate, or non–small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Data were collected from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019. The database was locked on February 18, 2021. Data analysis was based on intention to treat and safety and performed from October 5, 2018, to February 23, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Plinabulin, 40 mg, plus placebo or pegfilgrastim, 6 mg, plus placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was day of severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Additional end points included clinical consequences of CIN (febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, infections, antibiotic use, and modifications of chemotherapy dose), patient-reported outcomes for bone pain score, markers for immune suppression (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] of >5), immature neutrophils (band, promyelocyte, and myelocyte counts >0), and safety. RESULTS: Among the 105 patients included in the analysis (65 [6.19%] women; median age, 59 [range, 31-81] years), the primary end point was met within a noninferiority margin of 0.65 days, with a mean difference of 0.52 days (98.52% CI, 0.40-0.65 days). Grade 4 neutropenia frequency in cycle 1 was not significantly different. Plinabulin had earlier onset of action with less grade 4 neutropenia in week 1 of cycle 1. Plinabulin had fewer adverse clinical consequences with rates of febrile neutropenia (0 of 52 vs 1 of 53 [1.9%]), infections (4 of 52 [7.7%] vs 8 of 53 [15.1%]), chemotherapy dose delay of more than 7 days (2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), and permanent chemotherapy discontinuation (7 of 52 [13.5%] vs 14 of 53 [26.4%]). Patients receiving plinabulin had significantly less bone pain (difference, −0.67 [95% CI, −1.17 to −0.16]; P = .01) and a better immunosuppressive profile (NLR >5 at day 8, 2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 24 of 51 [46.0%]; P < .001). Plinabulin was well tolerated, with comparable safety to pegfilgrastim. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Plinabulin has comparable efficacy to pegfilgrastim for the prevention of CIN, with better safety and a better immunosuppressive profile. Plinabulin’s same-day dosing compared with pegfilgrastim’s next-day dosing offers distinct advantages, including reducing use of health care services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87960172022-02-07 Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial Blayney, Douglas W. Mohanlal, Ramon Adamchuk, Hryhoriy Kirtbaya, Dmitry Valikovich Chen, Michael Du, Lihua Ogenstad, Stephan Ginn, Greg Huang, Lan Zhang, Qingyuan JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 in patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors (PROTECTIVE-1) double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in multiple centers in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the US. Participants included patients with breast, prostate, or non–small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Data were collected from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019. The database was locked on February 18, 2021. Data analysis was based on intention to treat and safety and performed from October 5, 2018, to February 23, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Plinabulin, 40 mg, plus placebo or pegfilgrastim, 6 mg, plus placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was day of severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Additional end points included clinical consequences of CIN (febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, infections, antibiotic use, and modifications of chemotherapy dose), patient-reported outcomes for bone pain score, markers for immune suppression (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] of >5), immature neutrophils (band, promyelocyte, and myelocyte counts >0), and safety. RESULTS: Among the 105 patients included in the analysis (65 [6.19%] women; median age, 59 [range, 31-81] years), the primary end point was met within a noninferiority margin of 0.65 days, with a mean difference of 0.52 days (98.52% CI, 0.40-0.65 days). Grade 4 neutropenia frequency in cycle 1 was not significantly different. Plinabulin had earlier onset of action with less grade 4 neutropenia in week 1 of cycle 1. Plinabulin had fewer adverse clinical consequences with rates of febrile neutropenia (0 of 52 vs 1 of 53 [1.9%]), infections (4 of 52 [7.7%] vs 8 of 53 [15.1%]), chemotherapy dose delay of more than 7 days (2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), and permanent chemotherapy discontinuation (7 of 52 [13.5%] vs 14 of 53 [26.4%]). Patients receiving plinabulin had significantly less bone pain (difference, −0.67 [95% CI, −1.17 to −0.16]; P = .01) and a better immunosuppressive profile (NLR >5 at day 8, 2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 24 of 51 [46.0%]; P < .001). Plinabulin was well tolerated, with comparable safety to pegfilgrastim. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Plinabulin has comparable efficacy to pegfilgrastim for the prevention of CIN, with better safety and a better immunosuppressive profile. Plinabulin’s same-day dosing compared with pegfilgrastim’s next-day dosing offers distinct advantages, including reducing use of health care services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606 American Medical Association 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8796017/ /pubmed/35084480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45446 Text en Copyright 2022 Blayney DW et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Blayney, Douglas W.
Mohanlal, Ramon
Adamchuk, Hryhoriy
Kirtbaya, Dmitry Valikovich
Chen, Michael
Du, Lihua
Ogenstad, Stephan
Ginn, Greg
Huang, Lan
Zhang, Qingyuan
Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort efficacy of plinabulin vs pegfilgrastim for prevention of docetaxel-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumors: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45446
work_keys_str_mv AT blayneydouglasw efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mohanlalramon efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT adamchukhryhoriy efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kirtbayadmitryvalikovich efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT chenmichael efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dulihua efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ogenstadstephan efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ginngreg efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT huanglan efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhangqingyuan efficacyofplinabulinvspegfilgrastimforpreventionofdocetaxelinducedneutropeniainpatientswithsolidtumorsarandomizedclinicaltrial