Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in a simulated screening setting and its effectiveness in detecting missed and interval cancers. Methods: Digital mammograms were collected from Bahcesehir Mammographic Screening Program which is the first organized, p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221075172 |
_version_ | 1784641232474996736 |
---|---|
author | Kizildag Yirgin, Inci Koyluoglu, Yilmaz Onat Seker, Mustafa Ege Ozkan Gurdal, Sibel Ozaydin, Ayse Nilufer Ozcinar, Beyza Cabioğlu, Neslihan Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Erkin |
author_facet | Kizildag Yirgin, Inci Koyluoglu, Yilmaz Onat Seker, Mustafa Ege Ozkan Gurdal, Sibel Ozaydin, Ayse Nilufer Ozcinar, Beyza Cabioğlu, Neslihan Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Erkin |
author_sort | Kizildag Yirgin, Inci |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in a simulated screening setting and its effectiveness in detecting missed and interval cancers. Methods: Digital mammograms were collected from Bahcesehir Mammographic Screening Program which is the first organized, population-based, 10-year (2009-2019) screening program in Turkey. In total, 211 mammograms were extracted from the archive of the screening program in this retrospective study. One hundred ten of them were diagnosed as breast cancer (74 screen-detected, 27 interval, 9 missed), 101 of them were negative mammograms with a follow-up for at least 24 months. Cancer detection rates of radiologists in the screening program were compared with an AI system. Three different mammography assessment methods were used: (1) 2 radiologists’ assessment at screening center, (2) AI assessment based on the established risk score threshold, (3) a hypothetical radiologist and AI team-up in which AI was considered to be the third reader. Results: Area under curve was 0.853 (95% CI = 0.801-0.905) and the cut-off value for risk score was 34.5% with a sensitivity of 72.8% and a specificity of 88.3% for AI cancer detection in ROC analysis. Cancer detection rates were 67.3% for radiologists, 72.7% for AI, and 83.6% for radiologist and AI team-up. AI detected 72.7% of all cancers on its own, of which 77.5% were screen-detected, 15% were interval cancers, and 7.5% were missed cancers. Conclusion: AI may potentially enhance the capacity of breast cancer screening programs by increasing cancer detection rates and decreasing false-negative evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8796113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87961132022-01-29 Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis Kizildag Yirgin, Inci Koyluoglu, Yilmaz Onat Seker, Mustafa Ege Ozkan Gurdal, Sibel Ozaydin, Ayse Nilufer Ozcinar, Beyza Cabioğlu, Neslihan Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Erkin Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Purpose: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in a simulated screening setting and its effectiveness in detecting missed and interval cancers. Methods: Digital mammograms were collected from Bahcesehir Mammographic Screening Program which is the first organized, population-based, 10-year (2009-2019) screening program in Turkey. In total, 211 mammograms were extracted from the archive of the screening program in this retrospective study. One hundred ten of them were diagnosed as breast cancer (74 screen-detected, 27 interval, 9 missed), 101 of them were negative mammograms with a follow-up for at least 24 months. Cancer detection rates of radiologists in the screening program were compared with an AI system. Three different mammography assessment methods were used: (1) 2 radiologists’ assessment at screening center, (2) AI assessment based on the established risk score threshold, (3) a hypothetical radiologist and AI team-up in which AI was considered to be the third reader. Results: Area under curve was 0.853 (95% CI = 0.801-0.905) and the cut-off value for risk score was 34.5% with a sensitivity of 72.8% and a specificity of 88.3% for AI cancer detection in ROC analysis. Cancer detection rates were 67.3% for radiologists, 72.7% for AI, and 83.6% for radiologist and AI team-up. AI detected 72.7% of all cancers on its own, of which 77.5% were screen-detected, 15% were interval cancers, and 7.5% were missed cancers. Conclusion: AI may potentially enhance the capacity of breast cancer screening programs by increasing cancer detection rates and decreasing false-negative evaluations. SAGE Publications 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8796113/ /pubmed/35060413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221075172 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kizildag Yirgin, Inci Koyluoglu, Yilmaz Onat Seker, Mustafa Ege Ozkan Gurdal, Sibel Ozaydin, Ayse Nilufer Ozcinar, Beyza Cabioğlu, Neslihan Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Erkin Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of ai for cancers registered in a mammography screening program: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221075172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kizildagyirgininci diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT koyluogluyilmazonat diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT sekermustafaege diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT ozkangurdalsibel diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT ozaydinaysenilufer diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT ozcinarbeyza diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT cabiogluneslihan diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT ozmenvahit diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis AT aribalerkin diagnosticperformanceofaiforcancersregisteredinamammographyscreeningprogramaretrospectiveanalysis |