Cargando…

Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Learning and learning-related neuroplasticity in motor cortex are potential mechanisms mediating recovery of movement abilities after stroke. These mechanisms depend on dopaminergic projections from midbrain that may encode reward information. Likewise, therapist experience confirms the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Widmer, Mario, Held, Jeremia P. O., Wittmann, Frieder, Valladares, Belen, Lambercy, Olivier, Sturzenegger, Christian, Palla, Antonella, Lutz, Kai, Luft, Andreas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683211062898
_version_ 1784641242926153728
author Widmer, Mario
Held, Jeremia P. O.
Wittmann, Frieder
Valladares, Belen
Lambercy, Olivier
Sturzenegger, Christian
Palla, Antonella
Lutz, Kai
Luft, Andreas R.
author_facet Widmer, Mario
Held, Jeremia P. O.
Wittmann, Frieder
Valladares, Belen
Lambercy, Olivier
Sturzenegger, Christian
Palla, Antonella
Lutz, Kai
Luft, Andreas R.
author_sort Widmer, Mario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Learning and learning-related neuroplasticity in motor cortex are potential mechanisms mediating recovery of movement abilities after stroke. These mechanisms depend on dopaminergic projections from midbrain that may encode reward information. Likewise, therapist experience confirms the role of feedback/reward for training efficacy after stroke. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that rehabilitative training can be enhanced by adding performance feedback and monetary rewards. METHODS: This multicentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial used the ArmeoSenso virtual reality rehabilitation system to train 37 first-ever subacute stroke patients in arm-reaching to moving targets. The rewarded group (n = 19) trained with performance feedback (gameplay) and contingent monetary reward. The control group (n = 18) used the same system without monetary reward and with graphically minimized performance feedback. Primary outcome was the change in the two-dimensional reaching space until the end of the intervention period. Secondary clinical assessments were performed at baseline, after 3 weeks of training (15 1-hour sessions), and at 3 month follow-up. Duration and intensity of the interventions as well as concomitant therapy were comparable between groups. RESULTS: The two-dimensional reaching space showed an overall improvement but no difference between groups. The rewarded group, however, showed significantly greater improvements from baseline in secondary outcomes assessing arm activity (Box and Block Test at post-training: 6.03±2.95, P = .046 and 3 months: 9.66±3.11, P = .003; Wolf Motor Function Test [Score] at 3 months: .63±.22, P = .007) and arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity at 3 months: 8.22±3.11, P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Although neutral in its primary outcome, the trial signals a potential facilitating effect of reward on training-mediated improvement of arm paresis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02257125).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87961562022-01-29 Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial Widmer, Mario Held, Jeremia P. O. Wittmann, Frieder Valladares, Belen Lambercy, Olivier Sturzenegger, Christian Palla, Antonella Lutz, Kai Luft, Andreas R. Neurorehabil Neural Repair Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Learning and learning-related neuroplasticity in motor cortex are potential mechanisms mediating recovery of movement abilities after stroke. These mechanisms depend on dopaminergic projections from midbrain that may encode reward information. Likewise, therapist experience confirms the role of feedback/reward for training efficacy after stroke. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that rehabilitative training can be enhanced by adding performance feedback and monetary rewards. METHODS: This multicentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial used the ArmeoSenso virtual reality rehabilitation system to train 37 first-ever subacute stroke patients in arm-reaching to moving targets. The rewarded group (n = 19) trained with performance feedback (gameplay) and contingent monetary reward. The control group (n = 18) used the same system without monetary reward and with graphically minimized performance feedback. Primary outcome was the change in the two-dimensional reaching space until the end of the intervention period. Secondary clinical assessments were performed at baseline, after 3 weeks of training (15 1-hour sessions), and at 3 month follow-up. Duration and intensity of the interventions as well as concomitant therapy were comparable between groups. RESULTS: The two-dimensional reaching space showed an overall improvement but no difference between groups. The rewarded group, however, showed significantly greater improvements from baseline in secondary outcomes assessing arm activity (Box and Block Test at post-training: 6.03±2.95, P = .046 and 3 months: 9.66±3.11, P = .003; Wolf Motor Function Test [Score] at 3 months: .63±.22, P = .007) and arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity at 3 months: 8.22±3.11, P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Although neutral in its primary outcome, the trial signals a potential facilitating effect of reward on training-mediated improvement of arm paresis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02257125). SAGE Publications 2021-12-22 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8796156/ /pubmed/34937456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683211062898 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Widmer, Mario
Held, Jeremia P. O.
Wittmann, Frieder
Valladares, Belen
Lambercy, Olivier
Sturzenegger, Christian
Palla, Antonella
Lutz, Kai
Luft, Andreas R.
Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort reward during arm training improves impairment and activity after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683211062898
work_keys_str_mv AT widmermario rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heldjeremiapo rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wittmannfrieder rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT valladaresbelen rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lambercyolivier rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sturzeneggerchristian rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pallaantonella rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lutzkai rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luftandreasr rewardduringarmtrainingimprovesimpairmentandactivityafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial