Cargando…
Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. AIM: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163211049309 |
_version_ | 1784641243658059776 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Adrienne YL Ge, Mengqin Harrop, Emily Johnson, Margaret Oulton, Kate Skene, Simon S Wong, Ian CK Jamieson, Liz Howard, Richard F Liossi, Christina |
author_facet | Chan, Adrienne YL Ge, Mengqin Harrop, Emily Johnson, Margaret Oulton, Kate Skene, Simon S Wong, Ian CK Jamieson, Liz Howard, Richard F Liossi, Christina |
author_sort | Chan, Adrienne YL |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. AIM: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that are currently used in paediatric palliative care and examine their psychometric properties and feasibility and make recommendations for clinical practice. DESIGN: A systematic literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties of pain assessment tools of original peer-reviewed research published from inception of data sources to April 2021. DATA SOURCES: PsycINFO via ProQuest, Web of Science Core, Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, BIOSIS and CINAHL were searched from inception to April 2021. Hand searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were performed. RESULTS: From 1168 articles identified, 201 papers were selected for full-text assessment. Thirty-four articles met the eligibility criteria and we examined the psychometric properties of 22 pain assessment tools. Overall, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) had high cross-cultural validity, construct validity (hypothesis testing) and responsiveness; while the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) had high internal consistency, criterion validity, reliability and responsiveness. The number of studies per psychometric property of each pain assessment tool was limited and the methodological quality of included studies was low. CONCLUSION: Balancing aspects of feasibility and psychometric properties, the FPS-R is recommended for self-assessment, and the FLACC scale/FLACC Revised and PPP are the recommended observational tools in their respective age groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8796159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87961592022-01-29 Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice Chan, Adrienne YL Ge, Mengqin Harrop, Emily Johnson, Margaret Oulton, Kate Skene, Simon S Wong, Ian CK Jamieson, Liz Howard, Richard F Liossi, Christina Palliat Med Review Articles BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. AIM: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that are currently used in paediatric palliative care and examine their psychometric properties and feasibility and make recommendations for clinical practice. DESIGN: A systematic literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties of pain assessment tools of original peer-reviewed research published from inception of data sources to April 2021. DATA SOURCES: PsycINFO via ProQuest, Web of Science Core, Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, BIOSIS and CINAHL were searched from inception to April 2021. Hand searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were performed. RESULTS: From 1168 articles identified, 201 papers were selected for full-text assessment. Thirty-four articles met the eligibility criteria and we examined the psychometric properties of 22 pain assessment tools. Overall, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) had high cross-cultural validity, construct validity (hypothesis testing) and responsiveness; while the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) had high internal consistency, criterion validity, reliability and responsiveness. The number of studies per psychometric property of each pain assessment tool was limited and the methodological quality of included studies was low. CONCLUSION: Balancing aspects of feasibility and psychometric properties, the FPS-R is recommended for self-assessment, and the FLACC scale/FLACC Revised and PPP are the recommended observational tools in their respective age groups. SAGE Publications 2021-12-29 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8796159/ /pubmed/34965753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163211049309 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Chan, Adrienne YL Ge, Mengqin Harrop, Emily Johnson, Margaret Oulton, Kate Skene, Simon S Wong, Ian CK Jamieson, Liz Howard, Richard F Liossi, Christina Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice |
title | Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice |
title_full | Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice |
title_short | Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice |
title_sort | pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: a systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163211049309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanadrienneyl painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT gemengqin painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT harropemily painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT johnsonmargaret painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT oultonkate painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT skenesimons painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT wongianck painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT jamiesonliz painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT howardrichardf painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice AT liossichristina painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice |