Cargando…

Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. AIM: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Adrienne YL, Ge, Mengqin, Harrop, Emily, Johnson, Margaret, Oulton, Kate, Skene, Simon S, Wong, Ian CK, Jamieson, Liz, Howard, Richard F, Liossi, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163211049309
_version_ 1784641243658059776
author Chan, Adrienne YL
Ge, Mengqin
Harrop, Emily
Johnson, Margaret
Oulton, Kate
Skene, Simon S
Wong, Ian CK
Jamieson, Liz
Howard, Richard F
Liossi, Christina
author_facet Chan, Adrienne YL
Ge, Mengqin
Harrop, Emily
Johnson, Margaret
Oulton, Kate
Skene, Simon S
Wong, Ian CK
Jamieson, Liz
Howard, Richard F
Liossi, Christina
author_sort Chan, Adrienne YL
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. AIM: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that are currently used in paediatric palliative care and examine their psychometric properties and feasibility and make recommendations for clinical practice. DESIGN: A systematic literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties of pain assessment tools of original peer-reviewed research published from inception of data sources to April 2021. DATA SOURCES: PsycINFO via ProQuest, Web of Science Core, Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, BIOSIS and CINAHL were searched from inception to April 2021. Hand searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were performed. RESULTS: From 1168 articles identified, 201 papers were selected for full-text assessment. Thirty-four articles met the eligibility criteria and we examined the psychometric properties of 22 pain assessment tools. Overall, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) had high cross-cultural validity, construct validity (hypothesis testing) and responsiveness; while the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) had high internal consistency, criterion validity, reliability and responsiveness. The number of studies per psychometric property of each pain assessment tool was limited and the methodological quality of included studies was low. CONCLUSION: Balancing aspects of feasibility and psychometric properties, the FPS-R is recommended for self-assessment, and the FLACC scale/FLACC Revised and PPP are the recommended observational tools in their respective age groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87961592022-01-29 Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice Chan, Adrienne YL Ge, Mengqin Harrop, Emily Johnson, Margaret Oulton, Kate Skene, Simon S Wong, Ian CK Jamieson, Liz Howard, Richard F Liossi, Christina Palliat Med Review Articles BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. AIM: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that are currently used in paediatric palliative care and examine their psychometric properties and feasibility and make recommendations for clinical practice. DESIGN: A systematic literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties of pain assessment tools of original peer-reviewed research published from inception of data sources to April 2021. DATA SOURCES: PsycINFO via ProQuest, Web of Science Core, Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, BIOSIS and CINAHL were searched from inception to April 2021. Hand searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were performed. RESULTS: From 1168 articles identified, 201 papers were selected for full-text assessment. Thirty-four articles met the eligibility criteria and we examined the psychometric properties of 22 pain assessment tools. Overall, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) had high cross-cultural validity, construct validity (hypothesis testing) and responsiveness; while the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) had high internal consistency, criterion validity, reliability and responsiveness. The number of studies per psychometric property of each pain assessment tool was limited and the methodological quality of included studies was low. CONCLUSION: Balancing aspects of feasibility and psychometric properties, the FPS-R is recommended for self-assessment, and the FLACC scale/FLACC Revised and PPP are the recommended observational tools in their respective age groups. SAGE Publications 2021-12-29 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8796159/ /pubmed/34965753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163211049309 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Chan, Adrienne YL
Ge, Mengqin
Harrop, Emily
Johnson, Margaret
Oulton, Kate
Skene, Simon S
Wong, Ian CK
Jamieson, Liz
Howard, Richard F
Liossi, Christina
Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
title Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
title_full Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
title_fullStr Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
title_short Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
title_sort pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: a systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163211049309
work_keys_str_mv AT chanadrienneyl painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT gemengqin painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT harropemily painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT johnsonmargaret painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT oultonkate painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT skenesimons painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT wongianck painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT jamiesonliz painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT howardrichardf painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice
AT liossichristina painassessmenttoolsinpaediatricpalliativecareasystematicreviewofpsychometricpropertiesandrecommendationsforclinicalpractice