Cargando…

Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION: In the past four decades, over 700 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 80 meta-analyses have examined the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression. Overwhelming evidence suggests that all types of psychological treatments are effective. Yet, many aspects are still unexpl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plessen, Constantin Yves, Karyotaki, Eirini, Cuijpers, Pim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050197
_version_ 1784641256269283328
author Plessen, Constantin Yves
Karyotaki, Eirini
Cuijpers, Pim
author_facet Plessen, Constantin Yves
Karyotaki, Eirini
Cuijpers, Pim
author_sort Plessen, Constantin Yves
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the past four decades, over 700 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 80 meta-analyses have examined the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression. Overwhelming evidence suggests that all types of psychological treatments are effective. Yet, many aspects are still unexplored. Meta-analysts could perform hundreds of potential meta-analyses with the current literature, and a comprehensive bird’s-eye view of all published studies is missing. This protocol outlines how a multiverse meta-analysis can evaluate the entire body of the literature on psychological treatments of depression in a single analysis. Thereby, gaps of evidence and areas of robustness are highlighted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct systematic literature searches in bibliographical databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) up until 1 January 2021. We will include all RCTs comparing a psychological treatment with a control condition. We will include studies published in English, German, Spanish or Dutch, and exclude trials on maintenance and relapse prevention as well as dissertations. Two independent researchers will check all records. All self-reported and clinician-rated instruments measuring depression are included. We will extract information on recruitment settings, target groups, age groups, comorbidity, intervention formats, psychotherapy types, number of sessions, control conditions and country. Two independent researchers will assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. As part of the multiverse meta-analysis, unweighted, fixed effect and random effects models will be calculated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As we will not collect any primary data, an ethical approval of this protocol is not required. We will publish the results in a peer-review journal and present them at international conferences. We will follow open science practices and provide our code and data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87962192022-02-07 Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol Plessen, Constantin Yves Karyotaki, Eirini Cuijpers, Pim BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: In the past four decades, over 700 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 80 meta-analyses have examined the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression. Overwhelming evidence suggests that all types of psychological treatments are effective. Yet, many aspects are still unexplored. Meta-analysts could perform hundreds of potential meta-analyses with the current literature, and a comprehensive bird’s-eye view of all published studies is missing. This protocol outlines how a multiverse meta-analysis can evaluate the entire body of the literature on psychological treatments of depression in a single analysis. Thereby, gaps of evidence and areas of robustness are highlighted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct systematic literature searches in bibliographical databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) up until 1 January 2021. We will include all RCTs comparing a psychological treatment with a control condition. We will include studies published in English, German, Spanish or Dutch, and exclude trials on maintenance and relapse prevention as well as dissertations. Two independent researchers will check all records. All self-reported and clinician-rated instruments measuring depression are included. We will extract information on recruitment settings, target groups, age groups, comorbidity, intervention formats, psychotherapy types, number of sessions, control conditions and country. Two independent researchers will assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. As part of the multiverse meta-analysis, unweighted, fixed effect and random effects models will be calculated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As we will not collect any primary data, an ethical approval of this protocol is not required. We will publish the results in a peer-review journal and present them at international conferences. We will follow open science practices and provide our code and data. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8796219/ /pubmed/35078836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050197 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Plessen, Constantin Yves
Karyotaki, Eirini
Cuijpers, Pim
Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol
title Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol
title_full Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol
title_fullStr Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol
title_short Exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol
title_sort exploring the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression: a multiverse meta-analysis protocol
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050197
work_keys_str_mv AT plessenconstantinyves exploringtheefficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressionamultiversemetaanalysisprotocol
AT karyotakieirini exploringtheefficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressionamultiversemetaanalysisprotocol
AT cuijperspim exploringtheefficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressionamultiversemetaanalysisprotocol