Cargando…

Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: To explore barriers and facilitators to prescribing error reporting across primary care. DESIGN: Qualitative semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted to explore facilitators and barriers to reporting prescribing errors. Data collection and thematic analysis we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Nicola, Bullen, Kathryn, Sherwood, John, Wake, Nicola, Wilkes, Scott, Donovan, Gemma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050283
_version_ 1784641258905403392
author Hall, Nicola
Bullen, Kathryn
Sherwood, John
Wake, Nicola
Wilkes, Scott
Donovan, Gemma
author_facet Hall, Nicola
Bullen, Kathryn
Sherwood, John
Wake, Nicola
Wilkes, Scott
Donovan, Gemma
author_sort Hall, Nicola
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore barriers and facilitators to prescribing error reporting across primary care. DESIGN: Qualitative semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted to explore facilitators and barriers to reporting prescribing errors. Data collection and thematic analysis were informed by the COM-B model of behaviour change. Framework analysis was used for coding and charting the data with the assistance of NVivo software (V.12). General and context specific influences on prescribing error reporting were mapped to constructs from the COM-B model (ie, capability, opportunity and motivation). SETTING: Primary care organisations, including community pharmacy, general practice and community care from North East England. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed a maximal variation purposive sample of 25 participants, including prescribers, community pharmacists and key stakeholders with primary care or medicines safety roles at local, regional and national levels. RESULTS: Our findings describe a range of factors that influence the capability, opportunity and motivation to report prescribing errors in primary care. Three key contextual factors are also highlighted that were found to underpin many of the behavioural influences on reporting in this setting: the nature of prescribing; heterogeneous priorities for error reporting across and within different primary care organisations; and the complex infrastructure of reporting and learning pathways across primary care. Findings suggest that there is a lack of consistency in how, when and by whom, prescribing errors are reported across primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to identify cross-organisational and interprofessional consensus on agreed reporting thresholds and how best to facilitate a more collaborative approach to reporting and learning, that is, sensitive to the needs and priorities of disparate organisations across primary care. Despite acknowledged challenges, there may be potential for an increased role of community pharmacy in prescribing error reporting to support future learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87962292022-02-07 Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study Hall, Nicola Bullen, Kathryn Sherwood, John Wake, Nicola Wilkes, Scott Donovan, Gemma BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: To explore barriers and facilitators to prescribing error reporting across primary care. DESIGN: Qualitative semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted to explore facilitators and barriers to reporting prescribing errors. Data collection and thematic analysis were informed by the COM-B model of behaviour change. Framework analysis was used for coding and charting the data with the assistance of NVivo software (V.12). General and context specific influences on prescribing error reporting were mapped to constructs from the COM-B model (ie, capability, opportunity and motivation). SETTING: Primary care organisations, including community pharmacy, general practice and community care from North East England. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed a maximal variation purposive sample of 25 participants, including prescribers, community pharmacists and key stakeholders with primary care or medicines safety roles at local, regional and national levels. RESULTS: Our findings describe a range of factors that influence the capability, opportunity and motivation to report prescribing errors in primary care. Three key contextual factors are also highlighted that were found to underpin many of the behavioural influences on reporting in this setting: the nature of prescribing; heterogeneous priorities for error reporting across and within different primary care organisations; and the complex infrastructure of reporting and learning pathways across primary care. Findings suggest that there is a lack of consistency in how, when and by whom, prescribing errors are reported across primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to identify cross-organisational and interprofessional consensus on agreed reporting thresholds and how best to facilitate a more collaborative approach to reporting and learning, that is, sensitive to the needs and priorities of disparate organisations across primary care. Despite acknowledged challenges, there may be potential for an increased role of community pharmacy in prescribing error reporting to support future learning. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8796229/ /pubmed/35078837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050283 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Hall, Nicola
Bullen, Kathryn
Sherwood, John
Wake, Nicola
Wilkes, Scott
Donovan, Gemma
Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study
title Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study
title_full Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study
title_short Exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study
title_sort exploration of prescribing error reporting across primary care: a qualitative study
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050283
work_keys_str_mv AT hallnicola explorationofprescribingerrorreportingacrossprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT bullenkathryn explorationofprescribingerrorreportingacrossprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT sherwoodjohn explorationofprescribingerrorreportingacrossprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT wakenicola explorationofprescribingerrorreportingacrossprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT wilkesscott explorationofprescribingerrorreportingacrossprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT donovangemma explorationofprescribingerrorreportingacrossprimarycareaqualitativestudy