Cargando…

Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit

The 2010 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) guidelines for acute paediatric services set standards for time to senior review for paediatric medical admissions in the UK as tier two doctor (registrar) review within 4 hours and consultant review within 14 hours. Our aim was to imple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Danning, Abeywickrema, Movin, Vadeyar, Sharvari, Ward, Abigail, Abberton, Thomas, Rweyemamu, Justina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001561
_version_ 1784641265226219520
author Li, Danning
Abeywickrema, Movin
Vadeyar, Sharvari
Ward, Abigail
Abberton, Thomas
Rweyemamu, Justina
author_facet Li, Danning
Abeywickrema, Movin
Vadeyar, Sharvari
Ward, Abigail
Abberton, Thomas
Rweyemamu, Justina
author_sort Li, Danning
collection PubMed
description The 2010 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) guidelines for acute paediatric services set standards for time to senior review for paediatric medical admissions in the UK as tier two doctor (registrar) review within 4 hours and consultant review within 14 hours. Our aim was to implement these standards in our unit through increasing proportions of reviews within these timeframes and measuring the impact on patient flow. Four quality improvement cycles were completed between March 2018 and March 2020 capturing data from 288 patient data sets. Recommendations included the extension of consultant on-site availability out of routine working hours (after cycle 1), highlighting patients awaiting consultant review during team handover (after cycle 2), and improving tier two doctor rostering (after cycle 3). After highlighting patients for consultant priority review, the proportion of patients seen within 14 hours improved from 53.3% (cycle 2) to 95% (cycle 3, p=0.005). Improved tier two doctor cover increased the proportion meeting registrar review within 4 hours from 82.9% (cycle 3) to 96.2% (cycle 4, p=0.028). A large proportion of paediatric patients were managed and discharged at tier two doctor level (65.6% over cycles 1–4). An inverse correlation was seen (R=−0.587) between time to discharge and the number of tier two doctors on shift (cycle 4). The interventions conducted demonstrated significant improvement in proportions of paediatric patients seen within the RCPCH timeframes. Adequate tier two doctor staffing is a priority for prompt review and discharge of acute paediatric patients. Future work aims to consider factors such as nursing rostering, bed management and the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric flow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87962582022-02-07 Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit Li, Danning Abeywickrema, Movin Vadeyar, Sharvari Ward, Abigail Abberton, Thomas Rweyemamu, Justina BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report The 2010 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) guidelines for acute paediatric services set standards for time to senior review for paediatric medical admissions in the UK as tier two doctor (registrar) review within 4 hours and consultant review within 14 hours. Our aim was to implement these standards in our unit through increasing proportions of reviews within these timeframes and measuring the impact on patient flow. Four quality improvement cycles were completed between March 2018 and March 2020 capturing data from 288 patient data sets. Recommendations included the extension of consultant on-site availability out of routine working hours (after cycle 1), highlighting patients awaiting consultant review during team handover (after cycle 2), and improving tier two doctor rostering (after cycle 3). After highlighting patients for consultant priority review, the proportion of patients seen within 14 hours improved from 53.3% (cycle 2) to 95% (cycle 3, p=0.005). Improved tier two doctor cover increased the proportion meeting registrar review within 4 hours from 82.9% (cycle 3) to 96.2% (cycle 4, p=0.028). A large proportion of paediatric patients were managed and discharged at tier two doctor level (65.6% over cycles 1–4). An inverse correlation was seen (R=−0.587) between time to discharge and the number of tier two doctors on shift (cycle 4). The interventions conducted demonstrated significant improvement in proportions of paediatric patients seen within the RCPCH timeframes. Adequate tier two doctor staffing is a priority for prompt review and discharge of acute paediatric patients. Future work aims to consider factors such as nursing rostering, bed management and the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric flow. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8796258/ /pubmed/35086860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001561 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Li, Danning
Abeywickrema, Movin
Vadeyar, Sharvari
Ward, Abigail
Abberton, Thomas
Rweyemamu, Justina
Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit
title Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit
title_full Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit
title_fullStr Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit
title_full_unstemmed Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit
title_short Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit
title_sort improving paediatric flow in an uk paediatric assessment unit
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001561
work_keys_str_mv AT lidanning improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit
AT abeywickremamovin improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit
AT vadeyarsharvari improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit
AT wardabigail improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit
AT abbertonthomas improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit
AT rweyemamujustina improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit