Cargando…
Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit
The 2010 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) guidelines for acute paediatric services set standards for time to senior review for paediatric medical admissions in the UK as tier two doctor (registrar) review within 4 hours and consultant review within 14 hours. Our aim was to imple...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001561 |
_version_ | 1784641265226219520 |
---|---|
author | Li, Danning Abeywickrema, Movin Vadeyar, Sharvari Ward, Abigail Abberton, Thomas Rweyemamu, Justina |
author_facet | Li, Danning Abeywickrema, Movin Vadeyar, Sharvari Ward, Abigail Abberton, Thomas Rweyemamu, Justina |
author_sort | Li, Danning |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 2010 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) guidelines for acute paediatric services set standards for time to senior review for paediatric medical admissions in the UK as tier two doctor (registrar) review within 4 hours and consultant review within 14 hours. Our aim was to implement these standards in our unit through increasing proportions of reviews within these timeframes and measuring the impact on patient flow. Four quality improvement cycles were completed between March 2018 and March 2020 capturing data from 288 patient data sets. Recommendations included the extension of consultant on-site availability out of routine working hours (after cycle 1), highlighting patients awaiting consultant review during team handover (after cycle 2), and improving tier two doctor rostering (after cycle 3). After highlighting patients for consultant priority review, the proportion of patients seen within 14 hours improved from 53.3% (cycle 2) to 95% (cycle 3, p=0.005). Improved tier two doctor cover increased the proportion meeting registrar review within 4 hours from 82.9% (cycle 3) to 96.2% (cycle 4, p=0.028). A large proportion of paediatric patients were managed and discharged at tier two doctor level (65.6% over cycles 1–4). An inverse correlation was seen (R=−0.587) between time to discharge and the number of tier two doctors on shift (cycle 4). The interventions conducted demonstrated significant improvement in proportions of paediatric patients seen within the RCPCH timeframes. Adequate tier two doctor staffing is a priority for prompt review and discharge of acute paediatric patients. Future work aims to consider factors such as nursing rostering, bed management and the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric flow. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8796258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87962582022-02-07 Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit Li, Danning Abeywickrema, Movin Vadeyar, Sharvari Ward, Abigail Abberton, Thomas Rweyemamu, Justina BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report The 2010 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) guidelines for acute paediatric services set standards for time to senior review for paediatric medical admissions in the UK as tier two doctor (registrar) review within 4 hours and consultant review within 14 hours. Our aim was to implement these standards in our unit through increasing proportions of reviews within these timeframes and measuring the impact on patient flow. Four quality improvement cycles were completed between March 2018 and March 2020 capturing data from 288 patient data sets. Recommendations included the extension of consultant on-site availability out of routine working hours (after cycle 1), highlighting patients awaiting consultant review during team handover (after cycle 2), and improving tier two doctor rostering (after cycle 3). After highlighting patients for consultant priority review, the proportion of patients seen within 14 hours improved from 53.3% (cycle 2) to 95% (cycle 3, p=0.005). Improved tier two doctor cover increased the proportion meeting registrar review within 4 hours from 82.9% (cycle 3) to 96.2% (cycle 4, p=0.028). A large proportion of paediatric patients were managed and discharged at tier two doctor level (65.6% over cycles 1–4). An inverse correlation was seen (R=−0.587) between time to discharge and the number of tier two doctors on shift (cycle 4). The interventions conducted demonstrated significant improvement in proportions of paediatric patients seen within the RCPCH timeframes. Adequate tier two doctor staffing is a priority for prompt review and discharge of acute paediatric patients. Future work aims to consider factors such as nursing rostering, bed management and the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric flow. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8796258/ /pubmed/35086860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001561 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Li, Danning Abeywickrema, Movin Vadeyar, Sharvari Ward, Abigail Abberton, Thomas Rweyemamu, Justina Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit |
title | Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit |
title_full | Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit |
title_fullStr | Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit |
title_short | Improving paediatric flow in an UK Paediatric Assessment Unit |
title_sort | improving paediatric flow in an uk paediatric assessment unit |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lidanning improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit AT abeywickremamovin improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit AT vadeyarsharvari improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit AT wardabigail improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit AT abbertonthomas improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit AT rweyemamujustina improvingpaediatricflowinanukpaediatricassessmentunit |