Cargando…

Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients

This retrospective study assessed the effect of the co-administration of clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole in mild ovarian stimulation, compared to conventional regimens, among Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) Group 4 patients. There were 114 POSEI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hsin-Ta, Wu, Meng-Hsing, Tsai, Li-Chung, Chen, Ta-Sheng, Ou, Huang-Tz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.780392
_version_ 1784641277856317440
author Lin, Hsin-Ta
Wu, Meng-Hsing
Tsai, Li-Chung
Chen, Ta-Sheng
Ou, Huang-Tz
author_facet Lin, Hsin-Ta
Wu, Meng-Hsing
Tsai, Li-Chung
Chen, Ta-Sheng
Ou, Huang-Tz
author_sort Lin, Hsin-Ta
collection PubMed
description This retrospective study assessed the effect of the co-administration of clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole in mild ovarian stimulation, compared to conventional regimens, among Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) Group 4 patients. There were 114 POSEIDON Group 4 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatments with 216 stimulation cycles recruited from a Taiwan’s reproductive center during 2016-2020. Main outcomes were the numbers, quality of retrieved oocytes and embryo development. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed after embryo transfers. Per stimulation cycle, patients receiving mild stimulation with a combination of CC and letrozole (study group) versus those with COS (control group) had lower numbers of pre-ovulatory follicles (2.00 ± 1.23 vs. 2.37 ± 1.23, p=0.0066) and oocytes retrieved (1.83 ± 1.17 vs. 2.37 ± 1.23, p=0.0017), and lower follicular output rate (58.6% vs. 68.38%, p=0.0093) and mature oocyte output rate (44.29% vs. 52.88%, p=0.0386) but a higher top-quality metaphase II oocyte ratio (66.7% vs. 54.59%, p=0.0444) and a similar fertilization rate (91.67% vs. 89.04%, p=0.4660). With adjustment for significant between-group baseline differences using multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation model analyses, there was no statistical difference in oocytes retrieved and embryo development between the study and control groups, and insignificant increases in successful pregnancies in the study group were found compared to the control group (i.e., odds ratios [95% CIs]: 1.13 [0.55, 232] and 1.50 [0.65, 3.49] for ongoing pregnancy and live birth, respectively). For POSEIDON Group 4 patients, cotreatment of CC and letrozole in mild stimulation may increase the high-quality oocyte ratio and yield comparable fertilization rate and pregnancy outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87963172022-01-29 Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients Lin, Hsin-Ta Wu, Meng-Hsing Tsai, Li-Chung Chen, Ta-Sheng Ou, Huang-Tz Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology This retrospective study assessed the effect of the co-administration of clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole in mild ovarian stimulation, compared to conventional regimens, among Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) Group 4 patients. There were 114 POSEIDON Group 4 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatments with 216 stimulation cycles recruited from a Taiwan’s reproductive center during 2016-2020. Main outcomes were the numbers, quality of retrieved oocytes and embryo development. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed after embryo transfers. Per stimulation cycle, patients receiving mild stimulation with a combination of CC and letrozole (study group) versus those with COS (control group) had lower numbers of pre-ovulatory follicles (2.00 ± 1.23 vs. 2.37 ± 1.23, p=0.0066) and oocytes retrieved (1.83 ± 1.17 vs. 2.37 ± 1.23, p=0.0017), and lower follicular output rate (58.6% vs. 68.38%, p=0.0093) and mature oocyte output rate (44.29% vs. 52.88%, p=0.0386) but a higher top-quality metaphase II oocyte ratio (66.7% vs. 54.59%, p=0.0444) and a similar fertilization rate (91.67% vs. 89.04%, p=0.4660). With adjustment for significant between-group baseline differences using multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation model analyses, there was no statistical difference in oocytes retrieved and embryo development between the study and control groups, and insignificant increases in successful pregnancies in the study group were found compared to the control group (i.e., odds ratios [95% CIs]: 1.13 [0.55, 232] and 1.50 [0.65, 3.49] for ongoing pregnancy and live birth, respectively). For POSEIDON Group 4 patients, cotreatment of CC and letrozole in mild stimulation may increase the high-quality oocyte ratio and yield comparable fertilization rate and pregnancy outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8796317/ /pubmed/35095758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.780392 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lin, Wu, Tsai, Chen and Ou https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Lin, Hsin-Ta
Wu, Meng-Hsing
Tsai, Li-Chung
Chen, Ta-Sheng
Ou, Huang-Tz
Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients
title Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients
title_full Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients
title_fullStr Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients
title_short Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients
title_sort co-administration of clomiphene citrate and letrozole in mild ovarian stimulation versus conventional controlled ovarian stimulation among poseidon group 4 patients
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35095758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.780392
work_keys_str_mv AT linhsinta coadministrationofclomiphenecitrateandletrozoleinmildovarianstimulationversusconventionalcontrolledovarianstimulationamongposeidongroup4patients
AT wumenghsing coadministrationofclomiphenecitrateandletrozoleinmildovarianstimulationversusconventionalcontrolledovarianstimulationamongposeidongroup4patients
AT tsailichung coadministrationofclomiphenecitrateandletrozoleinmildovarianstimulationversusconventionalcontrolledovarianstimulationamongposeidongroup4patients
AT chentasheng coadministrationofclomiphenecitrateandletrozoleinmildovarianstimulationversusconventionalcontrolledovarianstimulationamongposeidongroup4patients
AT ouhuangtz coadministrationofclomiphenecitrateandletrozoleinmildovarianstimulationversusconventionalcontrolledovarianstimulationamongposeidongroup4patients