Cargando…

Does total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach using dual mobility increase leg length discrepancy compared with single mobility?

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) using dual mobility cup (DMC) is considered to effectively prevent postoperative dislocation. However, the dislocation and reduction procedure using a trial implant during the surgery is difficult because of high soft ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishii, Seiya, Homma, Yasuhiro, Baba, Tomonori, Jinnai, Yuta, Zhuang, Xu, Tanabe, Hiroki, Banno, Sammy, Matsumoto, Mikio, Watari, Taiji, Ozaki, Yu, Ochi, Hironori, Kaneko, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35236437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-020-00060-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) using dual mobility cup (DMC) is considered to effectively prevent postoperative dislocation. However, the dislocation and reduction procedure using a trial implant during the surgery is difficult because of high soft tissue tension. Thereby, leg length discrepancy (LLD) is difficult to assess when using DM via the DAA. PURPOSE: To compare the LLD between cases using conventional SM and those using DMC in THA via the DAA with fluoroscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 34 hips treated with DMC (DMC-DAA group) and 31 hips treated with SM (SM-DAA group). The LLD was defined as the difference in the distance from the teardrop to the medial-most point of the lesser trochanter between the operative and nonoperative sides at immediate postoperative X-ray. RESULTS: The mean LLD in the DMC-DAA group and SM-DAA group was 0.68 ± 7.7 mm and 0.80 ± 5.5, respectively, with no significant difference. The absolute value of the LLD in the DMC-DAA group and SM-DAA group was 6.3 ± 4.4 mm and 5.9 ± 5.5, respectively, with no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Despite the difficulty in assessment of the LLD during THA via the DAA using DMC, this technique does not increase the LLD compared with the use of SM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, matched case-control study.