Cargando…

Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Our study aims to determine the effectiveness of robotic technology for total knee arthroplasty in the successful restoration of the joint line of the knee with respect to that of a normal human anatomical knee. The restoration of the joint line is an important technical goal on which th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Varun O., Gadekar, Anup P., Vaidya, Narendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35236508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00103-6
_version_ 1784641345386708992
author Agrawal, Varun O.
Gadekar, Anup P.
Vaidya, Narendra
author_facet Agrawal, Varun O.
Gadekar, Anup P.
Vaidya, Narendra
author_sort Agrawal, Varun O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our study aims to determine the effectiveness of robotic technology for total knee arthroplasty in the successful restoration of the joint line of the knee with respect to that of a normal human anatomical knee. The restoration of the joint line is an important technical goal on which the postoperative outcomes and the success of the surgery depend. METHODS: Sixty-four postoperative plain anteroposterior radiographs of 60 patients, who received total knee arthroplasty by using the robotic technology were analyzed and compared with 66 similar radiographs of 60 patients who received the conventional method. The distances of the lateral epicondyle to the joint line (LEJL) and proximal tibiofibular joint to the joint line (PTFJJL) were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: We found that the mean value of LEJL minus PTFJJL in the robotic group was 0.334 ± 0.115 (mean ± SD), while in the conventional group, it was 2.304 ± 0.308. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The mean ratio (LEJL:PTFJJL) in the robotic group was also equal to 1.017 ± 0.042. CONCLUSION: From these findings it could be concluded that the robotic technology significantly increases the accuracy of the total knee arthroplasty and, compared to the conventional method, achieves an almost anatomical position of the joint line.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87965102022-02-03 Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis Agrawal, Varun O. Gadekar, Anup P. Vaidya, Narendra Arthroplasty Research BACKGROUND: Our study aims to determine the effectiveness of robotic technology for total knee arthroplasty in the successful restoration of the joint line of the knee with respect to that of a normal human anatomical knee. The restoration of the joint line is an important technical goal on which the postoperative outcomes and the success of the surgery depend. METHODS: Sixty-four postoperative plain anteroposterior radiographs of 60 patients, who received total knee arthroplasty by using the robotic technology were analyzed and compared with 66 similar radiographs of 60 patients who received the conventional method. The distances of the lateral epicondyle to the joint line (LEJL) and proximal tibiofibular joint to the joint line (PTFJJL) were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: We found that the mean value of LEJL minus PTFJJL in the robotic group was 0.334 ± 0.115 (mean ± SD), while in the conventional group, it was 2.304 ± 0.308. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The mean ratio (LEJL:PTFJJL) in the robotic group was also equal to 1.017 ± 0.042. CONCLUSION: From these findings it could be concluded that the robotic technology significantly increases the accuracy of the total knee arthroplasty and, compared to the conventional method, achieves an almost anatomical position of the joint line. BioMed Central 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8796510/ /pubmed/35236508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00103-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Agrawal, Varun O.
Gadekar, Anup P.
Vaidya, Narendra
Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis
title Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis
title_full Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis
title_short Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis
title_sort does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? a retrospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35236508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00103-6
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalvaruno doesrobotictechnologysuccessfullyrestorethejointlineaftertotalkneearthroplastyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT gadekaranupp doesrobotictechnologysuccessfullyrestorethejointlineaftertotalkneearthroplastyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT vaidyanarendra doesrobotictechnologysuccessfullyrestorethejointlineaftertotalkneearthroplastyaretrospectiveanalysis