Cargando…
Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction
The species‐range size distribution is a product of speciation, transformation of range‐sizes, and extinction. Previous empirical studies showed that it has a left‐skewed lognormal‐like distribution. We developed a new mathematical framework to study species‐range‐size distributions, one in which al...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8341 |
_version_ | 1784641430834118656 |
---|---|
author | Takashina, Nao Plank, Michael J. Jenkins, Clinton N. Economo, Evan P. |
author_facet | Takashina, Nao Plank, Michael J. Jenkins, Clinton N. Economo, Evan P. |
author_sort | Takashina, Nao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The species‐range size distribution is a product of speciation, transformation of range‐sizes, and extinction. Previous empirical studies showed that it has a left‐skewed lognormal‐like distribution. We developed a new mathematical framework to study species‐range‐size distributions, one in which allopatric speciation, transformation of range size, and the extinction process are explicitly integrated. The approach, which we call the gain‐loss‐allopatric speciation model, allows us to explore the effects of various speciation scenarios. Our model captures key dynamics thought to lead to known range‐size distributions. We also fitted the model to empirical range‐size distributions of birds, mammals, and beetles. Since geographic range dynamics are linked to speciation and extinction, our model provides predictions for the dynamics of species richness. When a species‐range‐size distribution initially evolves away from the range sizes at which the likelihood of speciation is low, it tends to cause diversification slowdown even in the absence of (bio)diversity dependence in speciation rate. Using the mathematical model developed here, we give a potential explanation for how observed range‐size distributions emerge from range‐size dynamics. Although the framework presented is minimalistic, it provides a starting point for examining hypotheses based on more complex mechanisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8796946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87969462022-02-04 Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction Takashina, Nao Plank, Michael J. Jenkins, Clinton N. Economo, Evan P. Ecol Evol Research Articles The species‐range size distribution is a product of speciation, transformation of range‐sizes, and extinction. Previous empirical studies showed that it has a left‐skewed lognormal‐like distribution. We developed a new mathematical framework to study species‐range‐size distributions, one in which allopatric speciation, transformation of range size, and the extinction process are explicitly integrated. The approach, which we call the gain‐loss‐allopatric speciation model, allows us to explore the effects of various speciation scenarios. Our model captures key dynamics thought to lead to known range‐size distributions. We also fitted the model to empirical range‐size distributions of birds, mammals, and beetles. Since geographic range dynamics are linked to speciation and extinction, our model provides predictions for the dynamics of species richness. When a species‐range‐size distribution initially evolves away from the range sizes at which the likelihood of speciation is low, it tends to cause diversification slowdown even in the absence of (bio)diversity dependence in speciation rate. Using the mathematical model developed here, we give a potential explanation for how observed range‐size distributions emerge from range‐size dynamics. Although the framework presented is minimalistic, it provides a starting point for examining hypotheses based on more complex mechanisms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8796946/ /pubmed/35127000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8341 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Takashina, Nao Plank, Michael J. Jenkins, Clinton N. Economo, Evan P. Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction |
title | Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction |
title_full | Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction |
title_fullStr | Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction |
title_full_unstemmed | Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction |
title_short | Species‐range‐size distributions: Integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction |
title_sort | species‐range‐size distributions: integrating the effects of speciation, transformation, and extinction |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takashinanao speciesrangesizedistributionsintegratingtheeffectsofspeciationtransformationandextinction AT plankmichaelj speciesrangesizedistributionsintegratingtheeffectsofspeciationtransformationandextinction AT jenkinsclintonn speciesrangesizedistributionsintegratingtheeffectsofspeciationtransformationandextinction AT economoevanp speciesrangesizedistributionsintegratingtheeffectsofspeciationtransformationandextinction |