Cargando…

Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish

Invasion of non‐native species might alter food web structure and the strength of top‐down control within lake ecosystems. As top‐down control exerted by fish populations is often dominated by young of the year fish, the impact of new fish species might depend on the feeding rates of the juvenile fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogorelec, Žiga, Rudstam, Lars G., Straile, Dietmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8486
_version_ 1784641433627525120
author Ogorelec, Žiga
Rudstam, Lars G.
Straile, Dietmar
author_facet Ogorelec, Žiga
Rudstam, Lars G.
Straile, Dietmar
author_sort Ogorelec, Žiga
collection PubMed
description Invasion of non‐native species might alter food web structure and the strength of top‐down control within lake ecosystems. As top‐down control exerted by fish populations is often dominated by young of the year fish, the impact of new fish species might depend on the feeding rates of the juvenile fish. Here we provide comparative analyses of feeding rates of juvenile whitefish (Coregonus wartmanni) – a native and specialised planktivore and an invasive generalist (sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus). We studied feedings rates of whitefish and sticklebacks in aquaria experiments using 2 cm to 8 cm fish feeding on seven zooplankton species common to Lake Constance. As whitefish hatch several months earlier than sticklebacks, 0+ whitefish are larger than 0+ sticklebacks throughout the year and hence are predicted to have higher feeding rates on especially large zooplankton species. We show that sticklebacks as small as 2 cm were able to feed on the largest zooplankton species of Lake Constance. Further, stickleback feeding rates were similar to both the same size 0+ whitefish and the larger 0+ whitefish co‐occurring with smaller 0+ sticklebacks. Hence, 0+ sticklebacks will compete with 0+ whitefish for the same zooplankton species, therefore the invasion of sticklebacks is unlikely to change the relative feeding pressure by individual 0+ fish on zooplankton species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8796957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87969572022-02-04 Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish Ogorelec, Žiga Rudstam, Lars G. Straile, Dietmar Ecol Evol Research Articles Invasion of non‐native species might alter food web structure and the strength of top‐down control within lake ecosystems. As top‐down control exerted by fish populations is often dominated by young of the year fish, the impact of new fish species might depend on the feeding rates of the juvenile fish. Here we provide comparative analyses of feeding rates of juvenile whitefish (Coregonus wartmanni) – a native and specialised planktivore and an invasive generalist (sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus). We studied feedings rates of whitefish and sticklebacks in aquaria experiments using 2 cm to 8 cm fish feeding on seven zooplankton species common to Lake Constance. As whitefish hatch several months earlier than sticklebacks, 0+ whitefish are larger than 0+ sticklebacks throughout the year and hence are predicted to have higher feeding rates on especially large zooplankton species. We show that sticklebacks as small as 2 cm were able to feed on the largest zooplankton species of Lake Constance. Further, stickleback feeding rates were similar to both the same size 0+ whitefish and the larger 0+ whitefish co‐occurring with smaller 0+ sticklebacks. Hence, 0+ sticklebacks will compete with 0+ whitefish for the same zooplankton species, therefore the invasion of sticklebacks is unlikely to change the relative feeding pressure by individual 0+ fish on zooplankton species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8796957/ /pubmed/35127021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8486 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ogorelec, Žiga
Rudstam, Lars G.
Straile, Dietmar
Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish
title Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish
title_full Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish
title_fullStr Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish
title_full_unstemmed Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish
title_short Can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? A comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish
title_sort can young‐of‐the‐year invasive fish keep up with young‐of‐the‐year native fish? a comparison of feeding rates between invasive sticklebacks and whitefish
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8486
work_keys_str_mv AT ogorelecziga canyoungoftheyearinvasivefishkeepupwithyoungoftheyearnativefishacomparisonoffeedingratesbetweeninvasivesticklebacksandwhitefish
AT rudstamlarsg canyoungoftheyearinvasivefishkeepupwithyoungoftheyearnativefishacomparisonoffeedingratesbetweeninvasivesticklebacksandwhitefish
AT strailedietmar canyoungoftheyearinvasivefishkeepupwithyoungoftheyearnativefishacomparisonoffeedingratesbetweeninvasivesticklebacksandwhitefish