Cargando…

Governing the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator: towards greater participation, transparency, and accountability

The Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) is a multistakeholder initiative quickly constructed in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic to respond to a catastrophic breakdown in global cooperation. ACT-A is now the largest international effort to achieve equitable access to COVID-19 healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Suerie, Armstrong, Jana, Hutler, Brian, Upshur, Ross, Katz, Rachel, Atuire, Caesar, Bhan, Anant, Emanuel, Ezekiel, Faden, Ruth, Ghimire, Prakash, Greco, Dirceu, Ho, Calvin WL, Kochhar, Sonali, Schaefer, G Owen, Shamsi-Gooshki, Ehsan, Singh, Jerome Amir, Smith, Maxwell J, Wolff, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34902308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02344-8
Descripción
Sumario:The Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) is a multistakeholder initiative quickly constructed in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic to respond to a catastrophic breakdown in global cooperation. ACT-A is now the largest international effort to achieve equitable access to COVID-19 health technologies, and its governance is a matter of broad public importance. We traced the evolution of ACT-A's governance through publicly available documents and analysed it against three principles embedded in the founding mission statement of ACT-A: participation, transparency, and accountability. We found three challenges to realising these principles. First, the roles of the various organisations in ACT-A decision making are unclear, obscuring who might be accountable to whom and for what. Second, the absence of a clearly defined decision making body; ACT-A instead has multiple centres of legally binding decision making and uneven arrangements for information transparency, inhibiting meaningful participation. Third, the nearly indiscernible role of governments in ACT-A, raising key questions about political legitimacy and channels for public accountability. With global public health and billions in public funding at stake, short-term improvements to governance arrangements can and should now be made. Efforts to strengthen pandemic preparedness for the future require attention to ethical, legitimate arrangements for governance.