Cargando…

Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: With the development of immunotherapy in recent years, the prognosis of patients is expected to improve due to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT). However, studies on combination therapy (ICI + intracranial RT) have reported inconsistent results, and it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Qian, Zhang, Chi, Tang, Sheng, Li, Jiayi, Ren, Qinglan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117204
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-902
_version_ 1784641522803671040
author He, Qian
Zhang, Chi
Tang, Sheng
Li, Jiayi
Ren, Qinglan
author_facet He, Qian
Zhang, Chi
Tang, Sheng
Li, Jiayi
Ren, Qinglan
author_sort He, Qian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the development of immunotherapy in recent years, the prognosis of patients is expected to improve due to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT). However, studies on combination therapy (ICI + intracranial RT) have reported inconsistent results, and it is unclear whether the combination has increased toxicity. By analyzing the latest relevant literature, we performed a meta-analysis to further clarify the effectiveness and safety of intracranial RT combined with ICI in patients with brain metastases (BMs). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for published studies that compared the efficacy and safety of intracranial RT combined with ICI versus intracranial RT alone in the treatment of BMs. Overall survival (OS), local brain failure (LBF), distant brain failure (DBF), and radiation necrosis (RN) were pooled with the use of the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: A total of 26 retrospective observation cohort studies were included, and over 1,500 patients who received ICI and intracranial RT were evaluated. Compared with intracranial RT alone, RT combined with ICI significantly improved OS in patients with BMs [HR =0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.64, P<0.001 when OS was defined from the date of diagnosis of BMs; HR =0.45, 95% CI: 0.39–0.52, P<0.001 when OS was defined from the date of RT], though the risk of RN was similar to that of RT alone (HR =1.27, 95% CI: 0.58–2.79, P=0.55). However, significant improvement in LBF and DBF was not obtained with RT combined with ICI (1-year LBF: OR =1.71, 95% CI: 0.38–7.67, P=0.48; LBF: HR =0.49, 95% CI: 0.28–0.87, P=0.01; 1-year DBF: OR =1.05, 95% CI: 0.47–2.33, P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: ICI combined with intracranial RT confers a significant OS benefit for patients with BMs without significantly increasing treatment-related toxicity, but further research regarding the specific details of combined treatment application is needed to improve the survival and quality of life of patients with BMs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8797322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87973222022-02-02 Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis He, Qian Zhang, Chi Tang, Sheng Li, Jiayi Ren, Qinglan Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: With the development of immunotherapy in recent years, the prognosis of patients is expected to improve due to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT). However, studies on combination therapy (ICI + intracranial RT) have reported inconsistent results, and it is unclear whether the combination has increased toxicity. By analyzing the latest relevant literature, we performed a meta-analysis to further clarify the effectiveness and safety of intracranial RT combined with ICI in patients with brain metastases (BMs). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for published studies that compared the efficacy and safety of intracranial RT combined with ICI versus intracranial RT alone in the treatment of BMs. Overall survival (OS), local brain failure (LBF), distant brain failure (DBF), and radiation necrosis (RN) were pooled with the use of the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: A total of 26 retrospective observation cohort studies were included, and over 1,500 patients who received ICI and intracranial RT were evaluated. Compared with intracranial RT alone, RT combined with ICI significantly improved OS in patients with BMs [HR =0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.64, P<0.001 when OS was defined from the date of diagnosis of BMs; HR =0.45, 95% CI: 0.39–0.52, P<0.001 when OS was defined from the date of RT], though the risk of RN was similar to that of RT alone (HR =1.27, 95% CI: 0.58–2.79, P=0.55). However, significant improvement in LBF and DBF was not obtained with RT combined with ICI (1-year LBF: OR =1.71, 95% CI: 0.38–7.67, P=0.48; LBF: HR =0.49, 95% CI: 0.28–0.87, P=0.01; 1-year DBF: OR =1.05, 95% CI: 0.47–2.33, P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: ICI combined with intracranial RT confers a significant OS benefit for patients with BMs without significantly increasing treatment-related toxicity, but further research regarding the specific details of combined treatment application is needed to improve the survival and quality of life of patients with BMs. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8797322/ /pubmed/35117204 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-902 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
He, Qian
Zhang, Chi
Tang, Sheng
Li, Jiayi
Ren, Qinglan
Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117204
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-902
work_keys_str_mv AT heqian intracranialradiotherapywithorwithoutimmunecheckpointinhibitionforbrainmetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangchi intracranialradiotherapywithorwithoutimmunecheckpointinhibitionforbrainmetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangsheng intracranialradiotherapywithorwithoutimmunecheckpointinhibitionforbrainmetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijiayi intracranialradiotherapywithorwithoutimmunecheckpointinhibitionforbrainmetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renqinglan intracranialradiotherapywithorwithoutimmunecheckpointinhibitionforbrainmetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis