Cargando…

Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review

BACKGROUND: Atypical meningiomas (AM) are WHO grade II tumors with high heterogeneity and invasiveness, which are unique in their clinical presentation, imaging, pathology, treatment, and prognosis. In 2016, the diagnosis of AM remodified by the classification of central nervous system tumors of Wor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Yiming, Ning, Bo, Hua, Xing, Liang, Zhiping, Ye, Jingchao, Yu, Fangyi, Xu, Zhilei, Chen, Jiaxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116476
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-375
_version_ 1784641543695499264
author Liang, Yiming
Ning, Bo
Hua, Xing
Liang, Zhiping
Ye, Jingchao
Yu, Fangyi
Xu, Zhilei
Chen, Jiaxiang
author_facet Liang, Yiming
Ning, Bo
Hua, Xing
Liang, Zhiping
Ye, Jingchao
Yu, Fangyi
Xu, Zhilei
Chen, Jiaxiang
author_sort Liang, Yiming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atypical meningiomas (AM) are WHO grade II tumors with high heterogeneity and invasiveness, which are unique in their clinical presentation, imaging, pathology, treatment, and prognosis. In 2016, the diagnosis of AM remodified by the classification of central nervous system tumors of World Health Organization (WHO). In order to further analyze the diagnosis and treatment characteristics of AM, the clinical diagnosis, surgery treatment and follow-up data of 6 patients with AM in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. METHODS: The clinical diagnosis, treatment and follow-up data of six patients with AM admitted to our hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively, and related literature was reviewed. RESULTS: The main clinical symptoms of the patients were increased intracranial pressure and functional area symptoms. MRI showed obvious enhancement, an unclear boundary with adjacent brain tissue, a large edema signal shadow in the white matter of peripheral brain tissue, and rapid enlargement in some cases. Pathological manifestations showed local necrosis and increased nuclear division activity. The results of immunocytochemistry showed that vimentin and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) were positive, S-100 protein (S-100) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were negative, and the Ki-67 proliferation index was increased. Simpson’s grade I-II resection was performed in five cases and no recurrence found after 4 to 46 months of follow-up. Simpson’s grade IV resection was performed in one case and no follow-up was performed after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: AMs are highly heterogeneous and invasive. Histologic diagnosis is the gold standard for diagnosis and surgical resection is the first treatment choice. Total resection (Simpson I-II) helps to reduce recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8797400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87974002022-02-02 Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review Liang, Yiming Ning, Bo Hua, Xing Liang, Zhiping Ye, Jingchao Yu, Fangyi Xu, Zhilei Chen, Jiaxiang Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Atypical meningiomas (AM) are WHO grade II tumors with high heterogeneity and invasiveness, which are unique in their clinical presentation, imaging, pathology, treatment, and prognosis. In 2016, the diagnosis of AM remodified by the classification of central nervous system tumors of World Health Organization (WHO). In order to further analyze the diagnosis and treatment characteristics of AM, the clinical diagnosis, surgery treatment and follow-up data of 6 patients with AM in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. METHODS: The clinical diagnosis, treatment and follow-up data of six patients with AM admitted to our hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively, and related literature was reviewed. RESULTS: The main clinical symptoms of the patients were increased intracranial pressure and functional area symptoms. MRI showed obvious enhancement, an unclear boundary with adjacent brain tissue, a large edema signal shadow in the white matter of peripheral brain tissue, and rapid enlargement in some cases. Pathological manifestations showed local necrosis and increased nuclear division activity. The results of immunocytochemistry showed that vimentin and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) were positive, S-100 protein (S-100) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were negative, and the Ki-67 proliferation index was increased. Simpson’s grade I-II resection was performed in five cases and no recurrence found after 4 to 46 months of follow-up. Simpson’s grade IV resection was performed in one case and no follow-up was performed after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: AMs are highly heterogeneous and invasive. Histologic diagnosis is the gold standard for diagnosis and surgical resection is the first treatment choice. Total resection (Simpson I-II) helps to reduce recurrence. AME Publishing Company 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8797400/ /pubmed/35116476 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-375 Text en 2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Liang, Yiming
Ning, Bo
Hua, Xing
Liang, Zhiping
Ye, Jingchao
Yu, Fangyi
Xu, Zhilei
Chen, Jiaxiang
Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review
title Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review
title_full Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review
title_fullStr Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review
title_short Atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review
title_sort atypical meningioma: a retrospective analysis of six cases and literature review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116476
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-375
work_keys_str_mv AT liangyiming atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview
AT ningbo atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview
AT huaxing atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview
AT liangzhiping atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview
AT yejingchao atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview
AT yufangyi atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview
AT xuzhilei atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview
AT chenjiaxiang atypicalmeningiomaaretrospectiveanalysisofsixcasesandliteraturereview