Cargando…

Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis

BACKGROUND: Although the upper limb is the second most common site of osteosarcoma, investigations into clinical manifestation differences between upper and lower limb patients are still sporadic. We retrospectively investigated the characteristics of these patients to gain a better understanding of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Xianbiao, Zeng, Ziliang, Tu, Jian, Yao, Hao, Bian, Yiying, Jin, Qinglin, Lv, Dongming, Wang, Bo, Shen, Jingnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117308
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2187
_version_ 1784641552012804096
author Xie, Xianbiao
Zeng, Ziliang
Tu, Jian
Yao, Hao
Bian, Yiying
Jin, Qinglin
Lv, Dongming
Wang, Bo
Shen, Jingnan
author_facet Xie, Xianbiao
Zeng, Ziliang
Tu, Jian
Yao, Hao
Bian, Yiying
Jin, Qinglin
Lv, Dongming
Wang, Bo
Shen, Jingnan
author_sort Xie, Xianbiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the upper limb is the second most common site of osteosarcoma, investigations into clinical manifestation differences between upper and lower limb patients are still sporadic. We retrospectively investigated the characteristics of these patients to gain a better understanding of the differences between upper and lower limb osteosarcoma patients. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients diagnosed with extremity osteosarcoma between 1997 and 2016 collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patient characteristics were analyzed with t-tests, rank sum tests and chi-square tests. Log-rank tests were applied to evaluate univariate significance, and Cox hazards models were performed in multivariate analysis. A binary logistics regression model was used to screen the risk factors related to lymph node involvement. RESULTS: In total, 1,882 patients, 1,588 (84.4%) with lower limb lesions and 294 (15.6%) with upper limb lesions were enrolled in our study. The patients with upper limb osteosarcoma exhibited poorer 5-year overall survival (OS) than patients with lower limb osteosarcoma (54.8% vs. 63.2%, P=0.02). The upper limb patients had more lymph node involvement (5.6% vs. 2.7%, P=0.03), which was found to be an independent prognostic factor (P=0.000). Tumors located in the upper limbs and the presence of distal metastasis were risk factors related to lymph node involvement in the extremity (P<0.05). The upper limb patients were tended to suffer greater risk of being affected by both metastasis and lymph node involvement (15.7% vs. 9.4%, P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Upper limb osteosarcoma patients are characterized by more lymph node involvement than lower limb patients, leading to poorer OS. In addition, upper limb patients are at greater risk for both lymph node involvement and distal metastasis. Our results suggest that upper limb patients should be screened more thoroughly for regional lymph node involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8797434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87974342022-02-02 Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis Xie, Xianbiao Zeng, Ziliang Tu, Jian Yao, Hao Bian, Yiying Jin, Qinglin Lv, Dongming Wang, Bo Shen, Jingnan Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Although the upper limb is the second most common site of osteosarcoma, investigations into clinical manifestation differences between upper and lower limb patients are still sporadic. We retrospectively investigated the characteristics of these patients to gain a better understanding of the differences between upper and lower limb osteosarcoma patients. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients diagnosed with extremity osteosarcoma between 1997 and 2016 collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patient characteristics were analyzed with t-tests, rank sum tests and chi-square tests. Log-rank tests were applied to evaluate univariate significance, and Cox hazards models were performed in multivariate analysis. A binary logistics regression model was used to screen the risk factors related to lymph node involvement. RESULTS: In total, 1,882 patients, 1,588 (84.4%) with lower limb lesions and 294 (15.6%) with upper limb lesions were enrolled in our study. The patients with upper limb osteosarcoma exhibited poorer 5-year overall survival (OS) than patients with lower limb osteosarcoma (54.8% vs. 63.2%, P=0.02). The upper limb patients had more lymph node involvement (5.6% vs. 2.7%, P=0.03), which was found to be an independent prognostic factor (P=0.000). Tumors located in the upper limbs and the presence of distal metastasis were risk factors related to lymph node involvement in the extremity (P<0.05). The upper limb patients were tended to suffer greater risk of being affected by both metastasis and lymph node involvement (15.7% vs. 9.4%, P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Upper limb osteosarcoma patients are characterized by more lymph node involvement than lower limb patients, leading to poorer OS. In addition, upper limb patients are at greater risk for both lymph node involvement and distal metastasis. Our results suggest that upper limb patients should be screened more thoroughly for regional lymph node involvement. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8797434/ /pubmed/35117308 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2187 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Xie, Xianbiao
Zeng, Ziliang
Tu, Jian
Yao, Hao
Bian, Yiying
Jin, Qinglin
Lv, Dongming
Wang, Bo
Shen, Jingnan
Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis
title Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis
title_full Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis
title_fullStr Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis
title_full_unstemmed Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis
title_short Regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a SEER analysis
title_sort regional lymph node involvement is associated with poorer survivorship in patients with upper extremity osteosarcoma than with lower extremity osteosarcoma: a seer analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117308
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2187
work_keys_str_mv AT xiexianbiao regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT zengziliang regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT tujian regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT yaohao regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT bianyiying regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT jinqinglin regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT lvdongming regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT wangbo regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis
AT shenjingnan regionallymphnodeinvolvementisassociatedwithpoorersurvivorshipinpatientswithupperextremityosteosarcomathanwithlowerextremityosteosarcomaaseeranalysis